Cargando…
Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons
BACKGROUND: A standardized evaluation tool is needed for the assessment of surgical outcomes in cleft lip surgery. Current scales for evaluating unilateral cleft lip/nose (UCL/N) aesthetic outcomes are limited in their reliability, ease of use, and application. The Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472 |
_version_ | 1783271025357619200 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Alex Restrepo, Carolina Deshpande, Gaurav Tredway, Caroline Bernstein, Sarah M. Patzer, Rachel Wendby, Lisa Schonmeyr, Bjorn |
author_facet | Campbell, Alex Restrepo, Carolina Deshpande, Gaurav Tredway, Caroline Bernstein, Sarah M. Patzer, Rachel Wendby, Lisa Schonmeyr, Bjorn |
author_sort | Campbell, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A standardized evaluation tool is needed for the assessment of surgical outcomes in cleft lip surgery. Current scales for evaluating unilateral cleft lip/nose (UCL/N) aesthetic outcomes are limited in their reliability, ease of use, and application. The Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE) scale measures symmetry of 4 components and sums these for a total score. The purpose of this study was to validate the SOE as a reliable tool for use by both surgeons and laypersons. METHODS: Twenty participants (9 surgeons and 12 laypeople) used the SOE to evaluate 25 sets of randomly selected presurgical and postsurgical standardized photographs of UCL/N patients. Interrater reliability for surgeon and laypeople was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Individual surgeons and laypeople both reached an ICC in the "fair to good" range (ICC = 0.42 and 0.59, respectively). Averaging 2 evaluators in the surgeon group improved the ICC to 0.58 and in the laypeople group to 0.74, respectively. Averaging 3 evaluators increased the ICC for surgeons to the "good" range (ICC = 0.71) and the ICC for laypeople to the "very good" range (ICC = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon and layperson raters can reliably use the SOE to assess the aesthetics results after surgical repair of UCL/N, and improved reliability and reproducibility is achieved by averaging the scores of multiple reviewers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5640349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56403492017-10-23 Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons Campbell, Alex Restrepo, Carolina Deshpande, Gaurav Tredway, Caroline Bernstein, Sarah M. Patzer, Rachel Wendby, Lisa Schonmeyr, Bjorn Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: A standardized evaluation tool is needed for the assessment of surgical outcomes in cleft lip surgery. Current scales for evaluating unilateral cleft lip/nose (UCL/N) aesthetic outcomes are limited in their reliability, ease of use, and application. The Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE) scale measures symmetry of 4 components and sums these for a total score. The purpose of this study was to validate the SOE as a reliable tool for use by both surgeons and laypersons. METHODS: Twenty participants (9 surgeons and 12 laypeople) used the SOE to evaluate 25 sets of randomly selected presurgical and postsurgical standardized photographs of UCL/N patients. Interrater reliability for surgeon and laypeople was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Individual surgeons and laypeople both reached an ICC in the "fair to good" range (ICC = 0.42 and 0.59, respectively). Averaging 2 evaluators in the surgeon group improved the ICC to 0.58 and in the laypeople group to 0.74, respectively. Averaging 3 evaluators increased the ICC for surgeons to the "good" range (ICC = 0.71) and the ICC for laypeople to the "very good" range (ICC = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon and layperson raters can reliably use the SOE to assess the aesthetics results after surgical repair of UCL/N, and improved reliability and reproducibility is achieved by averaging the scores of multiple reviewers. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5640349/ /pubmed/29062644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Campbell, Alex Restrepo, Carolina Deshpande, Gaurav Tredway, Caroline Bernstein, Sarah M. Patzer, Rachel Wendby, Lisa Schonmeyr, Bjorn Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title | Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title_full | Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title_short | Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons |
title_sort | validation of a unilateral cleft lip surgical outcomes evaluation scale for surgeons and laypersons |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellalex validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT restrepocarolina validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT deshpandegaurav validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT tredwaycaroline validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT bernsteinsarahm validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT patzerrachel validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT wendbylisa validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons AT schonmeyrbjorn validationofaunilateralcleftlipsurgicaloutcomesevaluationscaleforsurgeonsandlaypersons |