Cargando…
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488 |
_version_ | 1783271027955990528 |
---|---|
author | Highton, Lyndsey Johnson, Richard Kirwan, Cliona Murphy, John |
author_facet | Highton, Lyndsey Johnson, Richard Kirwan, Cliona Murphy, John |
author_sort | Highton, Lyndsey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole projection and control, while minimizing issues of implant visibility, palpability, and rippling. This is balanced with potential disadvantages including pain, disruption of pectoral muscle function, and animation. We report the results of a prospective study of prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage. METHODS: Prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage was performed in 106 patients (166 breasts) in our institution from 2013 to 2017. The cohort included patients undergoing immediate IBR (113 breasts) and revision of existing submuscular IBR (53 breasts). Patient demographics, surgical complications, and outcomes from a prospective database were analyzed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 485 days, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes have been good, with no significant capsular contractures or animation deformity. Minor complications including delayed healing, red breast, or seroma occurred in 14 breasts (8.4%). Major complications including necrosis and implant loss occurred in 5 breasts (3 patients), with a total explantation rate of 3%. No patients required more than an overnight stay in hospital, and there were no delays to adjuvant treatment in therapeutic cases. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral implant placement with ADM cover is emerging as an alternative approach for IBR. This method facilitates breast reconstruction with a good cosmetic outcome for patients who want a quick recovery without potential compromise of pectoral muscle function and associated problems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5640360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56403602017-10-23 Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Highton, Lyndsey Johnson, Richard Kirwan, Cliona Murphy, John Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole projection and control, while minimizing issues of implant visibility, palpability, and rippling. This is balanced with potential disadvantages including pain, disruption of pectoral muscle function, and animation. We report the results of a prospective study of prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage. METHODS: Prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage was performed in 106 patients (166 breasts) in our institution from 2013 to 2017. The cohort included patients undergoing immediate IBR (113 breasts) and revision of existing submuscular IBR (53 breasts). Patient demographics, surgical complications, and outcomes from a prospective database were analyzed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 485 days, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes have been good, with no significant capsular contractures or animation deformity. Minor complications including delayed healing, red breast, or seroma occurred in 14 breasts (8.4%). Major complications including necrosis and implant loss occurred in 5 breasts (3 patients), with a total explantation rate of 3%. No patients required more than an overnight stay in hospital, and there were no delays to adjuvant treatment in therapeutic cases. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral implant placement with ADM cover is emerging as an alternative approach for IBR. This method facilitates breast reconstruction with a good cosmetic outcome for patients who want a quick recovery without potential compromise of pectoral muscle function and associated problems. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5640360/ /pubmed/29062655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Highton, Lyndsey Johnson, Richard Kirwan, Cliona Murphy, John Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title | Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hightonlyndsey prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT johnsonrichard prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT kirwancliona prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction AT murphyjohn prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction |