Cargando…

Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Highton, Lyndsey, Johnson, Richard, Kirwan, Cliona, Murphy, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488
_version_ 1783271027955990528
author Highton, Lyndsey
Johnson, Richard
Kirwan, Cliona
Murphy, John
author_facet Highton, Lyndsey
Johnson, Richard
Kirwan, Cliona
Murphy, John
author_sort Highton, Lyndsey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole projection and control, while minimizing issues of implant visibility, palpability, and rippling. This is balanced with potential disadvantages including pain, disruption of pectoral muscle function, and animation. We report the results of a prospective study of prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage. METHODS: Prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage was performed in 106 patients (166 breasts) in our institution from 2013 to 2017. The cohort included patients undergoing immediate IBR (113 breasts) and revision of existing submuscular IBR (53 breasts). Patient demographics, surgical complications, and outcomes from a prospective database were analyzed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 485 days, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes have been good, with no significant capsular contractures or animation deformity. Minor complications including delayed healing, red breast, or seroma occurred in 14 breasts (8.4%). Major complications including necrosis and implant loss occurred in 5 breasts (3 patients), with a total explantation rate of 3%. No patients required more than an overnight stay in hospital, and there were no delays to adjuvant treatment in therapeutic cases. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral implant placement with ADM cover is emerging as an alternative approach for IBR. This method facilitates breast reconstruction with a good cosmetic outcome for patients who want a quick recovery without potential compromise of pectoral muscle function and associated problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5640360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56403602017-10-23 Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Highton, Lyndsey Johnson, Richard Kirwan, Cliona Murphy, John Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The development of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) has facilitated single-stage implant breast reconstruction (IBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy. The conventional approach of postpectoral implant placement with lower pole ADM confers a good cosmetic result by improving lower pole projection and control, while minimizing issues of implant visibility, palpability, and rippling. This is balanced with potential disadvantages including pain, disruption of pectoral muscle function, and animation. We report the results of a prospective study of prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage. METHODS: Prepectoral IBR with total ADM coverage was performed in 106 patients (166 breasts) in our institution from 2013 to 2017. The cohort included patients undergoing immediate IBR (113 breasts) and revision of existing submuscular IBR (53 breasts). Patient demographics, surgical complications, and outcomes from a prospective database were analyzed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 485 days, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes have been good, with no significant capsular contractures or animation deformity. Minor complications including delayed healing, red breast, or seroma occurred in 14 breasts (8.4%). Major complications including necrosis and implant loss occurred in 5 breasts (3 patients), with a total explantation rate of 3%. No patients required more than an overnight stay in hospital, and there were no delays to adjuvant treatment in therapeutic cases. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral implant placement with ADM cover is emerging as an alternative approach for IBR. This method facilitates breast reconstruction with a good cosmetic outcome for patients who want a quick recovery without potential compromise of pectoral muscle function and associated problems. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5640360/ /pubmed/29062655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Highton, Lyndsey
Johnson, Richard
Kirwan, Cliona
Murphy, John
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_full Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_short Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_sort prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001488
work_keys_str_mv AT hightonlyndsey prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT johnsonrichard prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT kirwancliona prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT murphyjohn prepectoralimplantbasedbreastreconstruction