Cargando…

Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the proportions of dependency states have changed between generational cohorts of older people. We aimed to estimate years lived in different dependency states at age 65 years in 1991 and 2011, and new projections of future demand for care. METHODS: In this popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kingston, Andrew, Wohland, Pia, Wittenberg, Raphael, Robinson, Louise, Brayne, Carol, Matthews, Fiona E, Jagger, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31575-1
_version_ 1783271044089380864
author Kingston, Andrew
Wohland, Pia
Wittenberg, Raphael
Robinson, Louise
Brayne, Carol
Matthews, Fiona E
Jagger, Carol
author_facet Kingston, Andrew
Wohland, Pia
Wittenberg, Raphael
Robinson, Louise
Brayne, Carol
Matthews, Fiona E
Jagger, Carol
author_sort Kingston, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the proportions of dependency states have changed between generational cohorts of older people. We aimed to estimate years lived in different dependency states at age 65 years in 1991 and 2011, and new projections of future demand for care. METHODS: In this population-based study, we compared two Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and CFAS II) of older people (aged ≥65 years) who were permanently registered with a general practice in three defined geographical areas (Cambridgeshire, Newcastle, and Nottingham; UK). These studies were done two decades apart (1991 and 2011). General practices provided lists of individuals to be contacted and were asked to exclude those who had died or might die over the next month. Baseline interviews were done in the community and care homes. Participants were stratified by age, and interviews occurred only after written informed consent was obtained. Information collected included basic sociodemographics, cognitive status, urinary incontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities of daily living. CFAS I was assigned as the 1991 cohort and CFAS II as the 2011 cohort, and both studies provided prevalence estimates of dependency in four states: high dependency (24-h care), medium dependency (daily care), low dependency (less than daily), and independent. Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method. To project future demands for social care, the proportions in each dependency state (by age group and sex) were applied to the 2014 England population projections. FINDINGS: Between 1991 and 2011, there were significant increases in years lived from age 65 years with low dependency (1·7 years [95% CI 1·0–2·4] for men and 2·4 years [1·8–3·1] for women) and increases with high dependency (0·9 years [0·2–1·7] for men and 1·3 years [0·5–2·1] for women). The majority of men's extra years of life were spent independent (36·3%) or with low dependency (36·3%) whereas for women the majority were spent with low dependency (58·0%), and only 4·8% were independent. There were substantial reductions in the proportions with medium and high dependency who lived in care homes, although, if these dependency and care home proportions remain constant in the future, further population ageing will require an extra 71 215 care home places by 2025. INTERPRETATION: On average older men now spend 2·4 years and women 3·0 years with substantial care needs, and most will live in the community. These findings have considerable implications for families of older people who provide the majority of unpaid care, but the findings also provide valuable new information for governments and care providers planning the resources and funding required for the care of their future ageing populations. FUNDING: Medical Research Council (G9901400) and (G06010220), with support from the National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Local research networks in West Anglia and Trent, UK, and Neurodegenerative Disease Research Network in Newcastle, UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5640505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56405052017-10-20 Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS) Kingston, Andrew Wohland, Pia Wittenberg, Raphael Robinson, Louise Brayne, Carol Matthews, Fiona E Jagger, Carol Lancet Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the proportions of dependency states have changed between generational cohorts of older people. We aimed to estimate years lived in different dependency states at age 65 years in 1991 and 2011, and new projections of future demand for care. METHODS: In this population-based study, we compared two Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and CFAS II) of older people (aged ≥65 years) who were permanently registered with a general practice in three defined geographical areas (Cambridgeshire, Newcastle, and Nottingham; UK). These studies were done two decades apart (1991 and 2011). General practices provided lists of individuals to be contacted and were asked to exclude those who had died or might die over the next month. Baseline interviews were done in the community and care homes. Participants were stratified by age, and interviews occurred only after written informed consent was obtained. Information collected included basic sociodemographics, cognitive status, urinary incontinence, and self-reported ability to do activities of daily living. CFAS I was assigned as the 1991 cohort and CFAS II as the 2011 cohort, and both studies provided prevalence estimates of dependency in four states: high dependency (24-h care), medium dependency (daily care), low dependency (less than daily), and independent. Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method. To project future demands for social care, the proportions in each dependency state (by age group and sex) were applied to the 2014 England population projections. FINDINGS: Between 1991 and 2011, there were significant increases in years lived from age 65 years with low dependency (1·7 years [95% CI 1·0–2·4] for men and 2·4 years [1·8–3·1] for women) and increases with high dependency (0·9 years [0·2–1·7] for men and 1·3 years [0·5–2·1] for women). The majority of men's extra years of life were spent independent (36·3%) or with low dependency (36·3%) whereas for women the majority were spent with low dependency (58·0%), and only 4·8% were independent. There were substantial reductions in the proportions with medium and high dependency who lived in care homes, although, if these dependency and care home proportions remain constant in the future, further population ageing will require an extra 71 215 care home places by 2025. INTERPRETATION: On average older men now spend 2·4 years and women 3·0 years with substantial care needs, and most will live in the community. These findings have considerable implications for families of older people who provide the majority of unpaid care, but the findings also provide valuable new information for governments and care providers planning the resources and funding required for the care of their future ageing populations. FUNDING: Medical Research Council (G9901400) and (G06010220), with support from the National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Local research networks in West Anglia and Trent, UK, and Neurodegenerative Disease Research Network in Newcastle, UK. Elsevier 2017-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5640505/ /pubmed/28821408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31575-1 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kingston, Andrew
Wohland, Pia
Wittenberg, Raphael
Robinson, Louise
Brayne, Carol
Matthews, Fiona E
Jagger, Carol
Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title_full Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title_fullStr Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title_full_unstemmed Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title_short Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS)
title_sort is late-life dependency increasing or not? a comparison of the cognitive function and ageing studies (cfas)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31575-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kingstonandrew islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT wohlandpia islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT wittenbergraphael islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT robinsonlouise islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT braynecarol islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT matthewsfionae islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT jaggercarol islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas
AT islatelifedependencyincreasingornotacomparisonofthecognitivefunctionandageingstudiescfas