Cargando…
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study
PURPOSE: To achieve successful medical rehabilitation and timely return to work, general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians need to cooperate effectively. This cooperation, however, can be hampered by organizational, interpersonal, and structural barriers. In this artic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28681175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6 |
_version_ | 1783271086809415680 |
---|---|
author | Stratil, Jan Rieger, Monika A. Voelter-Mahlknecht, Susanne |
author_facet | Stratil, Jan Rieger, Monika A. Voelter-Mahlknecht, Susanne |
author_sort | Stratil, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To achieve successful medical rehabilitation and timely return to work, general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians need to cooperate effectively. This cooperation, however, can be hampered by organizational, interpersonal, and structural barriers. In this article, we present and discuss suggestions proposed by physicians and patients on how these barriers can be overcome. METHODS: We conducted eight qualitative focus group discussions with general practitioners (GPs), occupational health physicians (OPs), rehabilitation physicians (RPs) and rehabilitation patients, which we analyzed with qualitative content analysis methods. RESULTS: Room for improvement exists with regard to (1) regulation (e.g. formalized role and obligatory input of occupational physicians), (2) finance (e.g. financial incentives for physicians based on the quality of the application), (3) technology (e.g. communication by email), (4) organizational procedures (e.g. provision of workplace descriptions to RPs on a routine basis), (5) education and information (e.g. joint educational programs, measures to improve the image of OPs), and (6) promotion of cooperation (e.g. between OPs and GPs in regards to the application process). CONCLUSIONS: Many suggestions are practical and could be implemented into the daily routine of physicians, while others demand multi-level, multi-stakeholder approaches. Our findings are supported by numerous international studies (especially from Western Europe). Future quantitative research could assess the relative weight of these findings. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed suggestions should be tested in controlled interventional studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5640724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56407242017-10-26 Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study Stratil, Jan Rieger, Monika A. Voelter-Mahlknecht, Susanne Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: To achieve successful medical rehabilitation and timely return to work, general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians need to cooperate effectively. This cooperation, however, can be hampered by organizational, interpersonal, and structural barriers. In this article, we present and discuss suggestions proposed by physicians and patients on how these barriers can be overcome. METHODS: We conducted eight qualitative focus group discussions with general practitioners (GPs), occupational health physicians (OPs), rehabilitation physicians (RPs) and rehabilitation patients, which we analyzed with qualitative content analysis methods. RESULTS: Room for improvement exists with regard to (1) regulation (e.g. formalized role and obligatory input of occupational physicians), (2) finance (e.g. financial incentives for physicians based on the quality of the application), (3) technology (e.g. communication by email), (4) organizational procedures (e.g. provision of workplace descriptions to RPs on a routine basis), (5) education and information (e.g. joint educational programs, measures to improve the image of OPs), and (6) promotion of cooperation (e.g. between OPs and GPs in regards to the application process). CONCLUSIONS: Many suggestions are practical and could be implemented into the daily routine of physicians, while others demand multi-level, multi-stakeholder approaches. Our findings are supported by numerous international studies (especially from Western Europe). Future quantitative research could assess the relative weight of these findings. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed suggestions should be tested in controlled interventional studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-05 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5640724/ /pubmed/28681175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stratil, Jan Rieger, Monika A. Voelter-Mahlknecht, Susanne Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title | Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title_full | Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title_short | Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study |
title_sort | optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in germany: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28681175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stratiljan optimizingcooperationbetweengeneralpractitionersoccupationalhealthandrehabilitationphysiciansingermanyaqualitativestudy AT riegermonikaa optimizingcooperationbetweengeneralpractitionersoccupationalhealthandrehabilitationphysiciansingermanyaqualitativestudy AT voeltermahlknechtsusanne optimizingcooperationbetweengeneralpractitionersoccupationalhealthandrehabilitationphysiciansingermanyaqualitativestudy |