Cargando…

Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?

We draw on outstanding research (Sanfey et al., 2006; McCabe, 2008; Bernheim, 2009; Camerer, 2013; Radu and McClure, 2013; Declerck and Boone, 2016) to substantiate that neuroeconomics covers the investigation of the biological microfoundations of economic cognition and economic conduct, attempts to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lăzăroiu, George, Pera, Aurel, Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Ramona O., Mircică, Nela, Negurită, Octav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188
_version_ 1783271196303818752
author Lăzăroiu, George
Pera, Aurel
Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Ramona O.
Mircică, Nela
Negurită, Octav
author_facet Lăzăroiu, George
Pera, Aurel
Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Ramona O.
Mircică, Nela
Negurită, Octav
author_sort Lăzăroiu, George
collection PubMed
description We draw on outstanding research (Sanfey et al., 2006; McCabe, 2008; Bernheim, 2009; Camerer, 2013; Radu and McClure, 2013; Declerck and Boone, 2016) to substantiate that neuroeconomics covers the investigation of the biological microfoundations of economic cognition and economic conduct, attempts to prove that a superior grasp of how choices are made brings about superior expectations regarding which options are selected, preserves the strictness of economic analysis in defining value-based decision, and associates imaging techniques with economic pattern to explain how individuals decide on a strategy taking into account various possible choices. Neuroeconomics is adequately prepared to regulate the notion of how choices are determined by mental states. The position that will be elaborated in this article is that neuroeconomic patterns are enabled and enhanced in descriptive capacity by psychological outcomes and substantiated in biological processes. Advancement in neuroeconomics takes place when outcomes from distinct procedures are coherent with an ordinary mechanistic clarification of what generates choice, construed by a computational pattern. We will develop this point further by proving that economics improves the concerted effort of neuroeconomics by using its observations in the various results that may stem from the planned and market interplays of diverse participants, and via a series of accurate, explicit, mathematical patterns to construe such interplays and results. Neuroeconomics experiments employ a mixture of brain imaging/stimulation tests advanced in the cognitive neurosciences and microeconomic systems/game theory tests advanced in the economic sciences. Our analyses indicate that neuroeconomics aims to employ the supplementary input gained from brain investigations, associated with the decision maker’s selection, with the purpose of better grasping the cogitation process and to utilize the outcomes to enhance economic patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5641305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56413052017-10-24 Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making? Lăzăroiu, George Pera, Aurel Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Ramona O. Mircică, Nela Negurită, Octav Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience We draw on outstanding research (Sanfey et al., 2006; McCabe, 2008; Bernheim, 2009; Camerer, 2013; Radu and McClure, 2013; Declerck and Boone, 2016) to substantiate that neuroeconomics covers the investigation of the biological microfoundations of economic cognition and economic conduct, attempts to prove that a superior grasp of how choices are made brings about superior expectations regarding which options are selected, preserves the strictness of economic analysis in defining value-based decision, and associates imaging techniques with economic pattern to explain how individuals decide on a strategy taking into account various possible choices. Neuroeconomics is adequately prepared to regulate the notion of how choices are determined by mental states. The position that will be elaborated in this article is that neuroeconomic patterns are enabled and enhanced in descriptive capacity by psychological outcomes and substantiated in biological processes. Advancement in neuroeconomics takes place when outcomes from distinct procedures are coherent with an ordinary mechanistic clarification of what generates choice, construed by a computational pattern. We will develop this point further by proving that economics improves the concerted effort of neuroeconomics by using its observations in the various results that may stem from the planned and market interplays of diverse participants, and via a series of accurate, explicit, mathematical patterns to construe such interplays and results. Neuroeconomics experiments employ a mixture of brain imaging/stimulation tests advanced in the cognitive neurosciences and microeconomic systems/game theory tests advanced in the economic sciences. Our analyses indicate that neuroeconomics aims to employ the supplementary input gained from brain investigations, associated with the decision maker’s selection, with the purpose of better grasping the cogitation process and to utilize the outcomes to enhance economic patterns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5641305/ /pubmed/29066963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lăzăroiu, Pera, Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Mircică and Negurită. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lăzăroiu, George
Pera, Aurel
Ștefănescu-Mihăilă, Ramona O.
Mircică, Nela
Negurită, Octav
Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title_full Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title_fullStr Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title_full_unstemmed Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title_short Can Neuroscience Assist Us in Constructing Better Patterns of Economic Decision-Making?
title_sort can neuroscience assist us in constructing better patterns of economic decision-making?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00188
work_keys_str_mv AT lazaroiugeorge canneuroscienceassistusinconstructingbetterpatternsofeconomicdecisionmaking
AT peraaurel canneuroscienceassistusinconstructingbetterpatternsofeconomicdecisionmaking
AT stefanescumihailaramonao canneuroscienceassistusinconstructingbetterpatternsofeconomicdecisionmaking
AT mircicanela canneuroscienceassistusinconstructingbetterpatternsofeconomicdecisionmaking
AT neguritaoctav canneuroscienceassistusinconstructingbetterpatternsofeconomicdecisionmaking