Cargando…

Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity

Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) have consistently been used in the investigation of auditory and cognitive processing in the research and clinical laboratories. There is currently no consensus on the choice of appropriate reference for auditory ERPs. The most commonly used references in aud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahajan, Yatin, Peter, Varghese, Sharma, Mridula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00560
_version_ 1783271203133194240
author Mahajan, Yatin
Peter, Varghese
Sharma, Mridula
author_facet Mahajan, Yatin
Peter, Varghese
Sharma, Mridula
author_sort Mahajan, Yatin
collection PubMed
description Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) have consistently been used in the investigation of auditory and cognitive processing in the research and clinical laboratories. There is currently no consensus on the choice of appropriate reference for auditory ERPs. The most commonly used references in auditory ERP research are the mathematically linked-mastoids (LM) and average referencing (AVG). Since LM and AVG referencing procedures do not solve the issue of electrically-neutral reference, Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) was developed to create a neutral reference for EEG recordings. The aim of the current research is to compare the influence of the reference on amplitude and latency of auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) as a function of magnitude of frequency deviance across three commonly used electrode montages (16, 32, and 64-channel) using REST, LM, and AVG reference procedures. The current study was designed to determine if the three reference methods capture the variation in amplitude and latency of MMN with the deviance magnitude. We recorded MMN from 12 normal hearing young adults in an auditory oddball paradigm with 1,000 Hz pure tone as standard and 1,030, 1,100, and 1,200 Hz as small, medium and large frequency deviants, respectively. The EEG data recorded to these sounds was re-referenced using REST, LM, and AVG methods across 16-, 32-, and 64-channel EEG electrode montages. Results revealed that while the latency of MMN decreased with increment in frequency of deviant sounds, no effect of frequency deviance was present for amplitude of MMN. There was no effect of referencing procedure on the experimental effect tested. The amplitude of MMN was largest when the ERP was computed using LM referencing and the REST referencing produced the largest amplitude of MMN for 64-channel montage. There was no effect of electrode-montage on AVG referencing induced ERPs. Contrary to our predictions, the results suggest that the auditory MMN elicited as a function of increments in frequency deviance does not depend on the choice of referencing procedure. The results also suggest that auditory ERPs generated using REST referencing is contingent on the electrode arrays more than the AVG referencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5641332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56413322017-10-24 Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity Mahajan, Yatin Peter, Varghese Sharma, Mridula Front Neurosci Neuroscience Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) have consistently been used in the investigation of auditory and cognitive processing in the research and clinical laboratories. There is currently no consensus on the choice of appropriate reference for auditory ERPs. The most commonly used references in auditory ERP research are the mathematically linked-mastoids (LM) and average referencing (AVG). Since LM and AVG referencing procedures do not solve the issue of electrically-neutral reference, Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) was developed to create a neutral reference for EEG recordings. The aim of the current research is to compare the influence of the reference on amplitude and latency of auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) as a function of magnitude of frequency deviance across three commonly used electrode montages (16, 32, and 64-channel) using REST, LM, and AVG reference procedures. The current study was designed to determine if the three reference methods capture the variation in amplitude and latency of MMN with the deviance magnitude. We recorded MMN from 12 normal hearing young adults in an auditory oddball paradigm with 1,000 Hz pure tone as standard and 1,030, 1,100, and 1,200 Hz as small, medium and large frequency deviants, respectively. The EEG data recorded to these sounds was re-referenced using REST, LM, and AVG methods across 16-, 32-, and 64-channel EEG electrode montages. Results revealed that while the latency of MMN decreased with increment in frequency of deviant sounds, no effect of frequency deviance was present for amplitude of MMN. There was no effect of referencing procedure on the experimental effect tested. The amplitude of MMN was largest when the ERP was computed using LM referencing and the REST referencing produced the largest amplitude of MMN for 64-channel montage. There was no effect of electrode-montage on AVG referencing induced ERPs. Contrary to our predictions, the results suggest that the auditory MMN elicited as a function of increments in frequency deviance does not depend on the choice of referencing procedure. The results also suggest that auditory ERPs generated using REST referencing is contingent on the electrode arrays more than the AVG referencing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5641332/ /pubmed/29066945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00560 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mahajan, Peter and Sharma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mahajan, Yatin
Peter, Varghese
Sharma, Mridula
Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title_full Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title_fullStr Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title_full_unstemmed Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title_short Effect of EEG Referencing Methods on Auditory Mismatch Negativity
title_sort effect of eeg referencing methods on auditory mismatch negativity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00560
work_keys_str_mv AT mahajanyatin effectofeegreferencingmethodsonauditorymismatchnegativity
AT petervarghese effectofeegreferencingmethodsonauditorymismatchnegativity
AT sharmamridula effectofeegreferencingmethodsonauditorymismatchnegativity