Cargando…

Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran

BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies occur more frequently in assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to normal conception (NC). It is known that the risk of congenital malformations in a multiple pregnancy are higher than single pregnancy. The aim of this study is to compare congenital malforma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mozafari Kermani, Ramin, Farhangniya, Mansoureh, Shahzadeh Fazeli, Seyed Abolhassan, Bagheri, Pezhman, Ashrafi, Mahnaz, Taqi Dizaj, Ahmad Vosough
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043707
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5415
_version_ 1783271230462230528
author Mozafari Kermani, Ramin
Farhangniya, Mansoureh
Shahzadeh Fazeli, Seyed Abolhassan
Bagheri, Pezhman
Ashrafi, Mahnaz
Taqi Dizaj, Ahmad Vosough
author_facet Mozafari Kermani, Ramin
Farhangniya, Mansoureh
Shahzadeh Fazeli, Seyed Abolhassan
Bagheri, Pezhman
Ashrafi, Mahnaz
Taqi Dizaj, Ahmad Vosough
author_sort Mozafari Kermani, Ramin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies occur more frequently in assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to normal conception (NC). It is known that the risk of congenital malformations in a multiple pregnancy are higher than single pregnancy. The aim of this study is to compare congenital malformations in singleton infants conceived by ART to singleton infants conceived naturally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this historical cohort study, we performed a historical cohort study of major congenital malformations (MCM) in 820 singleton births from January 2012 to December 2014. The data for this analysis were derived from Tehran’s ART linked data file. The risk of congenital malformations was compared in 164 ART infants and 656 NC infants. We performed multiple logistic regression analyses for the independent association of ART on each outcome. RESULTS: We found 40 infants with MCM 29 (4.4%) NC infants and 14 (8.3%) ART infants. In comparison with NC infants, ART infants had a significant 2-fold increased risk of MCM (P=0.046). After adjusting individually for maternal age, infant gender, prior stillbirth, mother’s history of spontaneous abortion, and type of delivery, we did not find any difference in risk. In this study the majority (95.1%) of all infants were normal but 4.9% of infants had at least one MCM. We found a difference in risk of MCMs between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We excluded the possible role of genotype and other unknown factors in causing more malformations in ART infants. CONCLUSION: This study reported a higher risk of MCMs in ART singleton infants than in NC singleton infants. Congenital heart disease, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and urogenital malformations were the most reported major malformations in singleton ART infants according to organ and system classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5641463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56414632018-01-01 Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran Mozafari Kermani, Ramin Farhangniya, Mansoureh Shahzadeh Fazeli, Seyed Abolhassan Bagheri, Pezhman Ashrafi, Mahnaz Taqi Dizaj, Ahmad Vosough Int J Fertil Steril Original Article BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies occur more frequently in assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to normal conception (NC). It is known that the risk of congenital malformations in a multiple pregnancy are higher than single pregnancy. The aim of this study is to compare congenital malformations in singleton infants conceived by ART to singleton infants conceived naturally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this historical cohort study, we performed a historical cohort study of major congenital malformations (MCM) in 820 singleton births from January 2012 to December 2014. The data for this analysis were derived from Tehran’s ART linked data file. The risk of congenital malformations was compared in 164 ART infants and 656 NC infants. We performed multiple logistic regression analyses for the independent association of ART on each outcome. RESULTS: We found 40 infants with MCM 29 (4.4%) NC infants and 14 (8.3%) ART infants. In comparison with NC infants, ART infants had a significant 2-fold increased risk of MCM (P=0.046). After adjusting individually for maternal age, infant gender, prior stillbirth, mother’s history of spontaneous abortion, and type of delivery, we did not find any difference in risk. In this study the majority (95.1%) of all infants were normal but 4.9% of infants had at least one MCM. We found a difference in risk of MCMs between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We excluded the possible role of genotype and other unknown factors in causing more malformations in ART infants. CONCLUSION: This study reported a higher risk of MCMs in ART singleton infants than in NC singleton infants. Congenital heart disease, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and urogenital malformations were the most reported major malformations in singleton ART infants according to organ and system classification. Royan Institute 2018 2017-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5641463/ /pubmed/29043707 http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5415 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mozafari Kermani, Ramin
Farhangniya, Mansoureh
Shahzadeh Fazeli, Seyed Abolhassan
Bagheri, Pezhman
Ashrafi, Mahnaz
Taqi Dizaj, Ahmad Vosough
Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title_full Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title_fullStr Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title_full_unstemmed Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title_short Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran
title_sort congenital malformations in singleton infants conceived by assisted reproductive technologies and singleton infants by natural conception in tehran, iran
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043707
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5415
work_keys_str_mv AT mozafarikermaniramin congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran
AT farhangniyamansoureh congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran
AT shahzadehfazeliseyedabolhassan congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran
AT bagheripezhman congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran
AT ashrafimahnaz congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran
AT taqidizajahmadvosough congenitalmalformationsinsingletoninfantsconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnologiesandsingletoninfantsbynaturalconceptionintehraniran