Cargando…

Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregor, Aleš, Filová, Eva, Novák, Martin, Kronek, Jakub, Chlup, Hynek, Buzgo, Matěj, Blahnová, Veronika, Lukášová, Věra, Bartoš, Martin, Nečas, Alois, Hošek, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29046717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3
_version_ 1783271294566924288
author Gregor, Aleš
Filová, Eva
Novák, Martin
Kronek, Jakub
Chlup, Hynek
Buzgo, Matěj
Blahnová, Veronika
Lukášová, Věra
Bartoš, Martin
Nečas, Alois
Hošek, Jan
author_facet Gregor, Aleš
Filová, Eva
Novák, Martin
Kronek, Jakub
Chlup, Hynek
Buzgo, Matěj
Blahnová, Veronika
Lukášová, Věra
Bartoš, Martin
Nečas, Alois
Hošek, Jan
author_sort Gregor, Aleš
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on “scaffolding” on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2–0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5641988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56419882017-10-18 Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer Gregor, Aleš Filová, Eva Novák, Martin Kronek, Jakub Chlup, Hynek Buzgo, Matěj Blahnová, Veronika Lukášová, Věra Bartoš, Martin Nečas, Alois Hošek, Jan J Biol Eng Research BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on “scaffolding” on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2–0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research. BioMed Central 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5641988/ /pubmed/29046717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gregor, Aleš
Filová, Eva
Novák, Martin
Kronek, Jakub
Chlup, Hynek
Buzgo, Matěj
Blahnová, Veronika
Lukášová, Věra
Bartoš, Martin
Nečas, Alois
Hošek, Jan
Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title_full Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title_fullStr Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title_full_unstemmed Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title_short Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer
title_sort designing of pla scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3d printer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29046717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorales designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT filovaeva designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT novakmartin designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT kronekjakub designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT chluphynek designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT buzgomatej designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT blahnovaveronika designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT lukasovavera designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT bartosmartin designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT necasalois designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter
AT hosekjan designingofplascaffoldsforbonetissuereplacementfabricatedbyordinarycommercial3dprinter