Cargando…

The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia

BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy"...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beber, Bárbara Costa, Kochhann, Renata, Matias, Bruna, Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009
_version_ 1783271360447905792
author Beber, Bárbara Costa
Kochhann, Renata
Matias, Bruna
Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes
author_facet Beber, Bárbara Costa
Kochhann, Renata
Matias, Bruna
Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes
author_sort Beber, Bárbara Costa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. METHODS: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. RESULTS: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. CONCLUSION: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56424192017-12-06 The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia Beber, Bárbara Costa Kochhann, Renata Matias, Bruna Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes Dement Neuropsychol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. METHODS: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. RESULTS: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. CONCLUSION: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed. Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5642419/ /pubmed/29213459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Articles
Beber, Bárbara Costa
Kochhann, Renata
Matias, Bruna
Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes
The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title_full The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title_fullStr The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title_full_unstemmed The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title_short The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
title_sort clock drawing test: performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with mci and dementia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009
work_keys_str_mv AT beberbarbaracosta theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT kochhannrenata theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT matiasbruna theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT chavesmarcialorenafagundes theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT beberbarbaracosta clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT kochhannrenata clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT matiasbruna clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia
AT chavesmarcialorenafagundes clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia