Cargando…
The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia
BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy"...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009 |
_version_ | 1783271360447905792 |
---|---|
author | Beber, Bárbara Costa Kochhann, Renata Matias, Bruna Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes |
author_facet | Beber, Bárbara Costa Kochhann, Renata Matias, Bruna Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes |
author_sort | Beber, Bárbara Costa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. METHODS: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. RESULTS: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. CONCLUSION: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5642419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56424192017-12-06 The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia Beber, Bárbara Costa Kochhann, Renata Matias, Bruna Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes Dement Neuropsychol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. METHODS: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. RESULTS: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. CONCLUSION: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed. Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5642419/ /pubmed/29213459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Beber, Bárbara Costa Kochhann, Renata Matias, Bruna Chaves, Márcia Lorena Fagundes The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title | The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title_full | The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title_fullStr | The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title_short | The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia |
title_sort | clock drawing test: performance differences between the free-drawn
and incomplete-copy versions in patients with mci and dementia |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1003009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beberbarbaracosta theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT kochhannrenata theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT matiasbruna theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT chavesmarcialorenafagundes theclockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT beberbarbaracosta clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT kochhannrenata clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT matiasbruna clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia AT chavesmarcialorenafagundes clockdrawingtestperformancedifferencesbetweenthefreedrawnandincompletecopyversionsinpatientswithmcianddementia |