Cargando…

Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes

BACKGROUND: Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis, allows investigation of potential targets at the functional protein level,. We identified TNBC subtypes at the protein level using RPPA and compared them with mRNA molecular subtypes (TNBCtype, TNBCtype-4, and PAM50) that is unique in its avai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masuda, Hiroko, Qi, Yuan, Liu, Shuying, Hayashi, Naoki, Kogawa, Takahiro, Hortobagyi, Gabriel N., Tripathy, Debu, Ueno, Naoto T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29050296
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19719
_version_ 1783271393446592512
author Masuda, Hiroko
Qi, Yuan
Liu, Shuying
Hayashi, Naoki
Kogawa, Takahiro
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Tripathy, Debu
Ueno, Naoto T.
author_facet Masuda, Hiroko
Qi, Yuan
Liu, Shuying
Hayashi, Naoki
Kogawa, Takahiro
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Tripathy, Debu
Ueno, Naoto T.
author_sort Masuda, Hiroko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis, allows investigation of potential targets at the functional protein level,. We identified TNBC subtypes at the protein level using RPPA and compared them with mRNA molecular subtypes (TNBCtype, TNBCtype-4, and PAM50) that is unique in its availability of both RPPA and mRNA analyses. METHODS: We classified the samples from 80 TNBC patients using both k-means and hierarchical consensus clustering analysis and performed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. We also investigated whether we could reproduce the mRNA molecular subtypes using the RPPA dataset. RESULTS: Both clustering methods divided all samples into 2 clusters that were biologically the same. The top canonical pathways included inflammation, hormonal receptors, and MAPK signaling pathways for the first cluster [“inflammation and hormonal-related (I/H) subtype”] and the GADD45, DNA damage, and p53 signaling pathways for the second cluster [“DNA damage (DD)-related subtype”]. Further k-means cluster analysis identified 5 TNBC clusters. Comparison between sample classification using the 5 RPPA-based k-means cluster subtypes and 6 gene-expression-based TNBCtype molecular subtypes showed significant association between the 2 classifications (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The I/H and DD subtypes identified by RPPA advance our understanding of TNBC’s heterogeneity from the functional proteomic perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56425712017-10-18 Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes Masuda, Hiroko Qi, Yuan Liu, Shuying Hayashi, Naoki Kogawa, Takahiro Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. Tripathy, Debu Ueno, Naoto T. Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis, allows investigation of potential targets at the functional protein level,. We identified TNBC subtypes at the protein level using RPPA and compared them with mRNA molecular subtypes (TNBCtype, TNBCtype-4, and PAM50) that is unique in its availability of both RPPA and mRNA analyses. METHODS: We classified the samples from 80 TNBC patients using both k-means and hierarchical consensus clustering analysis and performed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. We also investigated whether we could reproduce the mRNA molecular subtypes using the RPPA dataset. RESULTS: Both clustering methods divided all samples into 2 clusters that were biologically the same. The top canonical pathways included inflammation, hormonal receptors, and MAPK signaling pathways for the first cluster [“inflammation and hormonal-related (I/H) subtype”] and the GADD45, DNA damage, and p53 signaling pathways for the second cluster [“DNA damage (DD)-related subtype”]. Further k-means cluster analysis identified 5 TNBC clusters. Comparison between sample classification using the 5 RPPA-based k-means cluster subtypes and 6 gene-expression-based TNBCtype molecular subtypes showed significant association between the 2 classifications (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The I/H and DD subtypes identified by RPPA advance our understanding of TNBC’s heterogeneity from the functional proteomic perspective. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5642571/ /pubmed/29050296 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19719 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Masuda et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Masuda, Hiroko
Qi, Yuan
Liu, Shuying
Hayashi, Naoki
Kogawa, Takahiro
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Tripathy, Debu
Ueno, Naoto T.
Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title_full Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title_fullStr Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title_short Reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mRNA molecular subtypes
title_sort reverse phase protein array identification of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and comparison with mrna molecular subtypes
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29050296
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19719
work_keys_str_mv AT masudahiroko reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT qiyuan reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT liushuying reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT hayashinaoki reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT kogawatakahiro reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT hortobagyigabrieln reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT tripathydebu reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes
AT uenonaotot reversephaseproteinarrayidentificationoftriplenegativebreastcancersubtypesandcomparisonwithmrnamolecularsubtypes