Cargando…
PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070 |
_version_ | 1783271414330032128 |
---|---|
author | Desnoyer, Aude Blanc, Anne-Laure Pourcher, Valérie Besson, Marie Fonzo-Christe, Caroline Desmeules, Jules Perrier, Arnaud Bonnabry, Pascal Samer, Caroline Guignard, Bertrand |
author_facet | Desnoyer, Aude Blanc, Anne-Laure Pourcher, Valérie Besson, Marie Fonzo-Christe, Caroline Desmeules, Jules Perrier, Arnaud Bonnabry, Pascal Samer, Caroline Guignard, Bertrand |
author_sort | Desnoyer, Aude |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents and young healthcare professionals in PIM detection. DESIGN: Five-step study involving selection of medical domains, literature review and 17 semistructured interviews, a two-round Delphi survey, a forward/back-translation process and an electronic tool development. SETTING: 22 University and general hospitals from Canada, Belgium, France and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 40 physicians and 25 clinical pharmacists were involved in the study. Agreement with the checklist statements and their usefulness for healthcare professional training were evaluated using two 6-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 5). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement and usefulness ratings were defined as: >65% of the experts giving the statement a rating of 4 or 5, during the first Delphi-round and >75% during the second. RESULTS: 166 statements were generated during the first two steps. Mean agreement and usefulness ratings were 4.32/5 (95% CI 4.28 to 4.36) and 4.11/5 (4.07 to 4.15), respectively, during the first Delphi-round and 4.53/5 (4.51 to 4.56) and 4.36/5 (4.33 to 4.39) during the second (p<0.001). The final checklist includes 160 statements in 17 medical domains and 56 pathologies. An algorithm of approximately 31 000 lines was developed including comorbidities and medications variables to create the electronic tool. CONCLUSION: PIM-Check is the first electronic prescription-screening checklist designed to detect PIM in internal medicine. It is intended to help young healthcare professionals in their clinical practice to detect PIM, to reduce medication errors and to improve patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5642656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56426562017-10-25 PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients Desnoyer, Aude Blanc, Anne-Laure Pourcher, Valérie Besson, Marie Fonzo-Christe, Caroline Desmeules, Jules Perrier, Arnaud Bonnabry, Pascal Samer, Caroline Guignard, Bertrand BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents and young healthcare professionals in PIM detection. DESIGN: Five-step study involving selection of medical domains, literature review and 17 semistructured interviews, a two-round Delphi survey, a forward/back-translation process and an electronic tool development. SETTING: 22 University and general hospitals from Canada, Belgium, France and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 40 physicians and 25 clinical pharmacists were involved in the study. Agreement with the checklist statements and their usefulness for healthcare professional training were evaluated using two 6-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 5). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement and usefulness ratings were defined as: >65% of the experts giving the statement a rating of 4 or 5, during the first Delphi-round and >75% during the second. RESULTS: 166 statements were generated during the first two steps. Mean agreement and usefulness ratings were 4.32/5 (95% CI 4.28 to 4.36) and 4.11/5 (4.07 to 4.15), respectively, during the first Delphi-round and 4.53/5 (4.51 to 4.56) and 4.36/5 (4.33 to 4.39) during the second (p<0.001). The final checklist includes 160 statements in 17 medical domains and 56 pathologies. An algorithm of approximately 31 000 lines was developed including comorbidities and medications variables to create the electronic tool. CONCLUSION: PIM-Check is the first electronic prescription-screening checklist designed to detect PIM in internal medicine. It is intended to help young healthcare professionals in their clinical practice to detect PIM, to reduce medication errors and to improve patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5642656/ /pubmed/28760793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology and Therapeutics Desnoyer, Aude Blanc, Anne-Laure Pourcher, Valérie Besson, Marie Fonzo-Christe, Caroline Desmeules, Jules Perrier, Arnaud Bonnabry, Pascal Samer, Caroline Guignard, Bertrand PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title | PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title_full | PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title_fullStr | PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title_full_unstemmed | PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title_short | PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients |
title_sort | pim-check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a delphi method for internal medicine patients |
topic | Pharmacology and Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desnoyeraude pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT blancannelaure pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT pourchervalerie pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT bessonmarie pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT fonzochristecaroline pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT desmeulesjules pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT perrierarnaud pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT bonnabrypascal pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT samercaroline pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients AT guignardbertrand pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients |