Cargando…

PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients

OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desnoyer, Aude, Blanc, Anne-Laure, Pourcher, Valérie, Besson, Marie, Fonzo-Christe, Caroline, Desmeules, Jules, Perrier, Arnaud, Bonnabry, Pascal, Samer, Caroline, Guignard, Bertrand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070
_version_ 1783271414330032128
author Desnoyer, Aude
Blanc, Anne-Laure
Pourcher, Valérie
Besson, Marie
Fonzo-Christe, Caroline
Desmeules, Jules
Perrier, Arnaud
Bonnabry, Pascal
Samer, Caroline
Guignard, Bertrand
author_facet Desnoyer, Aude
Blanc, Anne-Laure
Pourcher, Valérie
Besson, Marie
Fonzo-Christe, Caroline
Desmeules, Jules
Perrier, Arnaud
Bonnabry, Pascal
Samer, Caroline
Guignard, Bertrand
author_sort Desnoyer, Aude
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents and young healthcare professionals in PIM detection. DESIGN: Five-step study involving selection of medical domains, literature review and 17 semistructured interviews, a two-round Delphi survey, a forward/back-translation process and an electronic tool development. SETTING: 22 University and general hospitals from Canada, Belgium, France and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 40 physicians and 25 clinical pharmacists were involved in the study. Agreement with the checklist statements and their usefulness for healthcare professional training were evaluated using two 6-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 5). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement and usefulness ratings were defined as: >65% of the experts giving the statement a rating of 4 or 5, during the first Delphi-round and >75% during the second. RESULTS: 166 statements were generated during the first two steps. Mean agreement and usefulness ratings were 4.32/5 (95% CI 4.28 to 4.36) and 4.11/5 (4.07 to 4.15), respectively, during the first Delphi-round and 4.53/5 (4.51 to 4.56) and 4.36/5 (4.33 to 4.39) during the second (p<0.001). The final checklist includes 160 statements in 17 medical domains and 56 pathologies. An algorithm of approximately 31 000 lines was developed including comorbidities and medications variables to create the electronic tool. CONCLUSION: PIM-Check is the first electronic prescription-screening checklist designed to detect PIM in internal medicine. It is intended to help young healthcare professionals in their clinical practice to detect PIM, to reduce medication errors and to improve patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56426562017-10-25 PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients Desnoyer, Aude Blanc, Anne-Laure Pourcher, Valérie Besson, Marie Fonzo-Christe, Caroline Desmeules, Jules Perrier, Arnaud Bonnabry, Pascal Samer, Caroline Guignard, Bertrand BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents and young healthcare professionals in PIM detection. DESIGN: Five-step study involving selection of medical domains, literature review and 17 semistructured interviews, a two-round Delphi survey, a forward/back-translation process and an electronic tool development. SETTING: 22 University and general hospitals from Canada, Belgium, France and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 40 physicians and 25 clinical pharmacists were involved in the study. Agreement with the checklist statements and their usefulness for healthcare professional training were evaluated using two 6-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 5). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement and usefulness ratings were defined as: >65% of the experts giving the statement a rating of 4 or 5, during the first Delphi-round and >75% during the second. RESULTS: 166 statements were generated during the first two steps. Mean agreement and usefulness ratings were 4.32/5 (95% CI 4.28 to 4.36) and 4.11/5 (4.07 to 4.15), respectively, during the first Delphi-round and 4.53/5 (4.51 to 4.56) and 4.36/5 (4.33 to 4.39) during the second (p<0.001). The final checklist includes 160 statements in 17 medical domains and 56 pathologies. An algorithm of approximately 31 000 lines was developed including comorbidities and medications variables to create the electronic tool. CONCLUSION: PIM-Check is the first electronic prescription-screening checklist designed to detect PIM in internal medicine. It is intended to help young healthcare professionals in their clinical practice to detect PIM, to reduce medication errors and to improve patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5642656/ /pubmed/28760793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Desnoyer, Aude
Blanc, Anne-Laure
Pourcher, Valérie
Besson, Marie
Fonzo-Christe, Caroline
Desmeules, Jules
Perrier, Arnaud
Bonnabry, Pascal
Samer, Caroline
Guignard, Bertrand
PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title_full PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title_fullStr PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title_full_unstemmed PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title_short PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients
title_sort pim-check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a delphi method for internal medicine patients
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016070
work_keys_str_mv AT desnoyeraude pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT blancannelaure pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT pourchervalerie pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT bessonmarie pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT fonzochristecaroline pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT desmeulesjules pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT perrierarnaud pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT bonnabrypascal pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT samercaroline pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients
AT guignardbertrand pimcheckdevelopmentofaninternationalprescriptionscreeningchecklistdesignedbyadelphimethodforinternalmedicinepatients