Cargando…

The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope

INTRODUCTION: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a complex design, for which many decisions about key design parameters must be made during the planning. These include the number of steps and the duration of time needed to embed the intervention. Feasibility studies are likely to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristunas, Caroline A, Hemming, Karla, Eborall, Helen C, Gray, Laura J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017290
_version_ 1783271415541137408
author Kristunas, Caroline A
Hemming, Karla
Eborall, Helen C
Gray, Laura J
author_facet Kristunas, Caroline A
Hemming, Karla
Eborall, Helen C
Gray, Laura J
author_sort Kristunas, Caroline A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a complex design, for which many decisions about key design parameters must be made during the planning. These include the number of steps and the duration of time needed to embed the intervention. Feasibility studies are likely to be useful for informing these decisions and increasing the likelihood of the main trial's success. However, the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs is currently unknown. This review aims to establish the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs and determine which feasibility issues are commonly investigated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fully published feasibility studies for SW-CRTs will be identified, according to predefined inclusion criteria, from searches conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and PsycINFO. To also identify and gain information on unpublished feasibility studies the following will be contacted: authors of published SW-CRTs (identified from the most recent systematic reviews); contacts for registered SW-CRTs (identified from clinical trials registries); lead statisticians of UK registered clinical trials units and researchers known to work in the area of SW-CRTs. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For the fully published feasibility studies, data will be extracted on the study characteristics, the rationale for the study, the process for determining progression to a main trial, how the study informed the main trial and whether the main trial went ahead. The researchers involved in the unpublished feasibility studies will be contacted to elicit the same information. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and provided alongside a descriptive analysis of the study characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethical approval, as no individual patient data will be used. The results of this review will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56426612017-10-25 The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope Kristunas, Caroline A Hemming, Karla Eborall, Helen C Gray, Laura J BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) is a complex design, for which many decisions about key design parameters must be made during the planning. These include the number of steps and the duration of time needed to embed the intervention. Feasibility studies are likely to be useful for informing these decisions and increasing the likelihood of the main trial's success. However, the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs is currently unknown. This review aims to establish the number of feasibility studies being conducted for SW-CRTs and determine which feasibility issues are commonly investigated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fully published feasibility studies for SW-CRTs will be identified, according to predefined inclusion criteria, from searches conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and PsycINFO. To also identify and gain information on unpublished feasibility studies the following will be contacted: authors of published SW-CRTs (identified from the most recent systematic reviews); contacts for registered SW-CRTs (identified from clinical trials registries); lead statisticians of UK registered clinical trials units and researchers known to work in the area of SW-CRTs. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For the fully published feasibility studies, data will be extracted on the study characteristics, the rationale for the study, the process for determining progression to a main trial, how the study informed the main trial and whether the main trial went ahead. The researchers involved in the unpublished feasibility studies will be contacted to elicit the same information. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and provided alongside a descriptive analysis of the study characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethical approval, as no individual patient data will be used. The results of this review will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5642661/ /pubmed/28765139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017290 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Kristunas, Caroline A
Hemming, Karla
Eborall, Helen C
Gray, Laura J
The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title_full The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title_fullStr The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title_full_unstemmed The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title_short The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
title_sort use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: protocol for a review of impact and scope
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017290
work_keys_str_mv AT kristunascarolinea theuseoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT hemmingkarla theuseoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT eborallhelenc theuseoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT graylauraj theuseoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT kristunascarolinea useoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT hemmingkarla useoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT eborallhelenc useoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope
AT graylauraj useoffeasibilitystudiesforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrialsprotocolforareviewofimpactandscope