Cargando…

Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010

OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify health technologies predicted in forecasting studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: A portrait describing health technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010 that were identified in a previous systematic review. Health technologies are cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doos, Lucy, Packer, Claire, Ward, Derek, Simpson, Sue, Stevens, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016206
_version_ 1783271421349199872
author Doos, Lucy
Packer, Claire
Ward, Derek
Simpson, Sue
Stevens, Andrew
author_facet Doos, Lucy
Packer, Claire
Ward, Derek
Simpson, Sue
Stevens, Andrew
author_sort Doos, Lucy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify health technologies predicted in forecasting studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: A portrait describing health technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010 that were identified in a previous systematic review. Health technologies are classified according to their type, purpose and clinical use; relating these to the original purpose and timing of the forecasting studies. DATA SOURCES: All health-related technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies identified in a previously published systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes related to (1) each forecasting study including country, year, intention and forecasting methods used and (2) the predicted technologies including technology type, purpose, targeted clinical area and forecast timeframe. RESULTS: Of the 896 identified health-related technologies, 685 (76.5%) were health technologies with an explicit or implied health application and included in our study. Of these, 19.1% were diagnostic or imaging tests, 14.3% devices or biomaterials, 12.6% information technology systems, eHealth or mHealth and 12% drugs. The majority of the technologies were intended to treat or manage disease (38.1%) or diagnose or monitor disease (26.1%). The most frequent targeted clinical areas were infectious diseases followed by cancer, circulatory and nervous system disorders. The most frequent technology types were for: infectious diseases—prophylactic vaccines (45.8%), cancer—drugs (40%), circulatory disease—devices and biomaterials (26.3%), and diseases of the nervous system—equally devices and biomaterials (25%) and regenerative medicine (25%). The mean timeframe for forecasting was 11.6 years (range 0–33 years, median=10, SD=6.6). The forecasting timeframe significantly differed by technology type (p=0.002), the intent of the forecasting group (p<0.001) and the methods used (p<001). CONCLUSION: While description and classification of predicted health-related technologies is crucial in preparing healthcare systems for adopting new innovations, further work is needed to test the accuracy of predictions made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56427562017-10-25 Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010 Doos, Lucy Packer, Claire Ward, Derek Simpson, Sue Stevens, Andrew BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify health technologies predicted in forecasting studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: A portrait describing health technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010 that were identified in a previous systematic review. Health technologies are classified according to their type, purpose and clinical use; relating these to the original purpose and timing of the forecasting studies. DATA SOURCES: All health-related technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies identified in a previously published systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes related to (1) each forecasting study including country, year, intention and forecasting methods used and (2) the predicted technologies including technology type, purpose, targeted clinical area and forecast timeframe. RESULTS: Of the 896 identified health-related technologies, 685 (76.5%) were health technologies with an explicit or implied health application and included in our study. Of these, 19.1% were diagnostic or imaging tests, 14.3% devices or biomaterials, 12.6% information technology systems, eHealth or mHealth and 12% drugs. The majority of the technologies were intended to treat or manage disease (38.1%) or diagnose or monitor disease (26.1%). The most frequent targeted clinical areas were infectious diseases followed by cancer, circulatory and nervous system disorders. The most frequent technology types were for: infectious diseases—prophylactic vaccines (45.8%), cancer—drugs (40%), circulatory disease—devices and biomaterials (26.3%), and diseases of the nervous system—equally devices and biomaterials (25%) and regenerative medicine (25%). The mean timeframe for forecasting was 11.6 years (range 0–33 years, median=10, SD=6.6). The forecasting timeframe significantly differed by technology type (p=0.002), the intent of the forecasting group (p<0.001) and the methods used (p<001). CONCLUSION: While description and classification of predicted health-related technologies is crucial in preparing healthcare systems for adopting new innovations, further work is needed to test the accuracy of predictions made. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5642756/ /pubmed/28760796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016206 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Doos, Lucy
Packer, Claire
Ward, Derek
Simpson, Sue
Stevens, Andrew
Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title_full Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title_fullStr Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title_full_unstemmed Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title_short Past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
title_sort past speculations of future health technologies: a description of technologies predicted in 15 forecasting studies published between 1986 and 2010
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016206
work_keys_str_mv AT dooslucy pastspeculationsoffuturehealthtechnologiesadescriptionoftechnologiespredictedin15forecastingstudiespublishedbetween1986and2010
AT packerclaire pastspeculationsoffuturehealthtechnologiesadescriptionoftechnologiespredictedin15forecastingstudiespublishedbetween1986and2010
AT wardderek pastspeculationsoffuturehealthtechnologiesadescriptionoftechnologiespredictedin15forecastingstudiespublishedbetween1986and2010
AT simpsonsue pastspeculationsoffuturehealthtechnologiesadescriptionoftechnologiespredictedin15forecastingstudiespublishedbetween1986and2010
AT stevensandrew pastspeculationsoffuturehealthtechnologiesadescriptionoftechnologiespredictedin15forecastingstudiespublishedbetween1986and2010