Cargando…

Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is a crucial endpoint for patients with prostate cancer (PCa), but currently lacks a validated claims-based algorithm for detection. OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm using ICD-9 codes to facilitate accurate reporting of PCa metastases. METHODS: Medical records from 300 men h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolan, Matthew T., Kim, Sung, Shao, Yu-Hsuan, Lu-Yao, Grace L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29046824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970406
_version_ 1783271449940721664
author Dolan, Matthew T.
Kim, Sung
Shao, Yu-Hsuan
Lu-Yao, Grace L.
author_facet Dolan, Matthew T.
Kim, Sung
Shao, Yu-Hsuan
Lu-Yao, Grace L.
author_sort Dolan, Matthew T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metastasis is a crucial endpoint for patients with prostate cancer (PCa), but currently lacks a validated claims-based algorithm for detection. OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm using ICD-9 codes to facilitate accurate reporting of PCa metastases. METHODS: Medical records from 300 men hospitalized at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital for PCa were reviewed. Using the presence of metastatic PCa on chart review as the gold standard, two algorithms to detect metastases were compared. Algorithm A used ICD-9 codes 198.5 (bone metastases), 197.0 (lung metastases), 197.7 (liver metastases), or 198.3 (brain and spinal cord metastases) to detect metastases, while algorithm B used only 198.5. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the two algorithms were determined. Kappa statistics were used to measure agreement rates between claim data and chart review. RESULTS: Algorithm A demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 95%, 100%, 100%, and 98.7%, respectively. Corresponding numbers for algorithm B were 90%, 100%, 100%, and 97.5%, respectively. The agreement rate is 96.8% for algorithm A and 93.5% for algorithm B. CONCLUSIONS: Using ICD-9 codes 198.5, 197.0, 197.7, or 198.3 in detecting the presence of PCa metastases offers a high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5642978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56429782017-10-16 Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes Dolan, Matthew T. Kim, Sung Shao, Yu-Hsuan Lu-Yao, Grace L. Epidemiol Res Int Article BACKGROUND: Metastasis is a crucial endpoint for patients with prostate cancer (PCa), but currently lacks a validated claims-based algorithm for detection. OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm using ICD-9 codes to facilitate accurate reporting of PCa metastases. METHODS: Medical records from 300 men hospitalized at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital for PCa were reviewed. Using the presence of metastatic PCa on chart review as the gold standard, two algorithms to detect metastases were compared. Algorithm A used ICD-9 codes 198.5 (bone metastases), 197.0 (lung metastases), 197.7 (liver metastases), or 198.3 (brain and spinal cord metastases) to detect metastases, while algorithm B used only 198.5. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the two algorithms were determined. Kappa statistics were used to measure agreement rates between claim data and chart review. RESULTS: Algorithm A demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 95%, 100%, 100%, and 98.7%, respectively. Corresponding numbers for algorithm B were 90%, 100%, 100%, and 97.5%, respectively. The agreement rate is 96.8% for algorithm A and 93.5% for algorithm B. CONCLUSIONS: Using ICD-9 codes 198.5, 197.0, 197.7, or 198.3 in detecting the presence of PCa metastases offers a high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV value. 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC5642978/ /pubmed/29046824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970406 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Dolan, Matthew T.
Kim, Sung
Shao, Yu-Hsuan
Lu-Yao, Grace L.
Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title_full Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title_fullStr Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title_full_unstemmed Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title_short Authentication of Algorithm to Detect Metastases in Men with Prostate Cancer Using ICD-9 Codes
title_sort authentication of algorithm to detect metastases in men with prostate cancer using icd-9 codes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29046824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970406
work_keys_str_mv AT dolanmatthewt authenticationofalgorithmtodetectmetastasesinmenwithprostatecancerusingicd9codes
AT kimsung authenticationofalgorithmtodetectmetastasesinmenwithprostatecancerusingicd9codes
AT shaoyuhsuan authenticationofalgorithmtodetectmetastasesinmenwithprostatecancerusingicd9codes
AT luyaogracel authenticationofalgorithmtodetectmetastasesinmenwithprostatecancerusingicd9codes