Cargando…
MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595 |
_version_ | 1783271468638928896 |
---|---|
author | Persson, Karin Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug Barca, Maria Lage Cavallin, Lena Ferreira, Daniel Knapskog, Anne-Brita Selbæk, Geir Brækhus, Anne Saltvedt, Ingvild Westman, Eric Engedal, Knut |
author_facet | Persson, Karin Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug Barca, Maria Lage Cavallin, Lena Ferreira, Daniel Knapskog, Anne-Brita Selbæk, Geir Brækhus, Anne Saltvedt, Ingvild Westman, Eric Engedal, Knut |
author_sort | Persson, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe the differences between these four AD subtypes in a longitudinal memory-clinic study. METHODS: The medial temporal lobes, the frontal regions, and the posterior regions were assessed with MRI visual rating scales to categorize 123 patients with mild AD according to ICD-10 and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) into atrophy subtypes. Demographic data, neuropsychological measures, cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers, and progression rate of dementia at two-year follow-up were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Typical AD was found in 59 patients (48%); 29 (24%) patients had limbic-predominant AD; 19 (15%) had hippocampal-sparing AD; and 16 (13%) belonged to the group with minimal atrophy. No differences were found regarding cognitive test results or progression rates between the different subtypes. Using adjusted logistic regression analysis, we found that the patients in the minimal-atrophy group were less educated, had a lower baseline CDR sum of boxes score, and had higher levels of amyloid β in the cerebrospinal fluid. CONCLUSION: Previous results concerning the prevalence and the similar phenotypic expressions of the four AD subtypes were confirmed. The main finding was that patients with minimal atrophy as assessed by MRI had less education than the other AD subtypes and that this could support the cognitive reserve hypothesis and, at least in part, explain the lower degree of atrophy in this group. Patients with less formal education might present with clinically typical AD symptoms before they have positive biomarkers of AD and this finding might challenge suggested biomarker-based criteria for AD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5643102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56431022017-10-30 MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis Persson, Karin Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug Barca, Maria Lage Cavallin, Lena Ferreira, Daniel Knapskog, Anne-Brita Selbæk, Geir Brækhus, Anne Saltvedt, Ingvild Westman, Eric Engedal, Knut PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe the differences between these four AD subtypes in a longitudinal memory-clinic study. METHODS: The medial temporal lobes, the frontal regions, and the posterior regions were assessed with MRI visual rating scales to categorize 123 patients with mild AD according to ICD-10 and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) into atrophy subtypes. Demographic data, neuropsychological measures, cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers, and progression rate of dementia at two-year follow-up were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Typical AD was found in 59 patients (48%); 29 (24%) patients had limbic-predominant AD; 19 (15%) had hippocampal-sparing AD; and 16 (13%) belonged to the group with minimal atrophy. No differences were found regarding cognitive test results or progression rates between the different subtypes. Using adjusted logistic regression analysis, we found that the patients in the minimal-atrophy group were less educated, had a lower baseline CDR sum of boxes score, and had higher levels of amyloid β in the cerebrospinal fluid. CONCLUSION: Previous results concerning the prevalence and the similar phenotypic expressions of the four AD subtypes were confirmed. The main finding was that patients with minimal atrophy as assessed by MRI had less education than the other AD subtypes and that this could support the cognitive reserve hypothesis and, at least in part, explain the lower degree of atrophy in this group. Patients with less formal education might present with clinically typical AD symptoms before they have positive biomarkers of AD and this finding might challenge suggested biomarker-based criteria for AD. Public Library of Science 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643102/ /pubmed/29036183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595 Text en © 2017 Persson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Persson, Karin Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug Barca, Maria Lage Cavallin, Lena Ferreira, Daniel Knapskog, Anne-Brita Selbæk, Geir Brækhus, Anne Saltvedt, Ingvild Westman, Eric Engedal, Knut MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title | MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title_full | MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title_fullStr | MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title_short | MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
title_sort | mri-assessed atrophy subtypes in alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perssonkarin mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT eldholmrannveigsakshaug mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT barcamarialage mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT cavallinlena mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT ferreiradaniel mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT knapskogannebrita mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT selbækgeir mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT brækhusanne mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT saltvedtingvild mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT westmaneric mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis AT engedalknut mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis |