Cargando…

MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persson, Karin, Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug, Barca, Maria Lage, Cavallin, Lena, Ferreira, Daniel, Knapskog, Anne-Brita, Selbæk, Geir, Brækhus, Anne, Saltvedt, Ingvild, Westman, Eric, Engedal, Knut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595
_version_ 1783271468638928896
author Persson, Karin
Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug
Barca, Maria Lage
Cavallin, Lena
Ferreira, Daniel
Knapskog, Anne-Brita
Selbæk, Geir
Brækhus, Anne
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Westman, Eric
Engedal, Knut
author_facet Persson, Karin
Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug
Barca, Maria Lage
Cavallin, Lena
Ferreira, Daniel
Knapskog, Anne-Brita
Selbæk, Geir
Brækhus, Anne
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Westman, Eric
Engedal, Knut
author_sort Persson, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe the differences between these four AD subtypes in a longitudinal memory-clinic study. METHODS: The medial temporal lobes, the frontal regions, and the posterior regions were assessed with MRI visual rating scales to categorize 123 patients with mild AD according to ICD-10 and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) into atrophy subtypes. Demographic data, neuropsychological measures, cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers, and progression rate of dementia at two-year follow-up were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Typical AD was found in 59 patients (48%); 29 (24%) patients had limbic-predominant AD; 19 (15%) had hippocampal-sparing AD; and 16 (13%) belonged to the group with minimal atrophy. No differences were found regarding cognitive test results or progression rates between the different subtypes. Using adjusted logistic regression analysis, we found that the patients in the minimal-atrophy group were less educated, had a lower baseline CDR sum of boxes score, and had higher levels of amyloid β in the cerebrospinal fluid. CONCLUSION: Previous results concerning the prevalence and the similar phenotypic expressions of the four AD subtypes were confirmed. The main finding was that patients with minimal atrophy as assessed by MRI had less education than the other AD subtypes and that this could support the cognitive reserve hypothesis and, at least in part, explain the lower degree of atrophy in this group. Patients with less formal education might present with clinically typical AD symptoms before they have positive biomarkers of AD and this finding might challenge suggested biomarker-based criteria for AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56431022017-10-30 MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis Persson, Karin Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug Barca, Maria Lage Cavallin, Lena Ferreira, Daniel Knapskog, Anne-Brita Selbæk, Geir Brækhus, Anne Saltvedt, Ingvild Westman, Eric Engedal, Knut PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: MRI assessment of the brain has demonstrated four different patterns of atrophy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD): typical AD, limbic-predominant AD, hippocampal-sparing AD, and a subtype with minimal atrophy, previously referred to as no-atrophy AD. The aim of the present study was to identify and describe the differences between these four AD subtypes in a longitudinal memory-clinic study. METHODS: The medial temporal lobes, the frontal regions, and the posterior regions were assessed with MRI visual rating scales to categorize 123 patients with mild AD according to ICD-10 and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) into atrophy subtypes. Demographic data, neuropsychological measures, cerebrospinal-fluid biomarkers, and progression rate of dementia at two-year follow-up were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Typical AD was found in 59 patients (48%); 29 (24%) patients had limbic-predominant AD; 19 (15%) had hippocampal-sparing AD; and 16 (13%) belonged to the group with minimal atrophy. No differences were found regarding cognitive test results or progression rates between the different subtypes. Using adjusted logistic regression analysis, we found that the patients in the minimal-atrophy group were less educated, had a lower baseline CDR sum of boxes score, and had higher levels of amyloid β in the cerebrospinal fluid. CONCLUSION: Previous results concerning the prevalence and the similar phenotypic expressions of the four AD subtypes were confirmed. The main finding was that patients with minimal atrophy as assessed by MRI had less education than the other AD subtypes and that this could support the cognitive reserve hypothesis and, at least in part, explain the lower degree of atrophy in this group. Patients with less formal education might present with clinically typical AD symptoms before they have positive biomarkers of AD and this finding might challenge suggested biomarker-based criteria for AD. Public Library of Science 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643102/ /pubmed/29036183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595 Text en © 2017 Persson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Persson, Karin
Eldholm, Rannveig Sakshaug
Barca, Maria Lage
Cavallin, Lena
Ferreira, Daniel
Knapskog, Anne-Brita
Selbæk, Geir
Brækhus, Anne
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Westman, Eric
Engedal, Knut
MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title_full MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title_fullStr MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title_short MRI-assessed atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
title_sort mri-assessed atrophy subtypes in alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive reserve hypothesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186595
work_keys_str_mv AT perssonkarin mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT eldholmrannveigsakshaug mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT barcamarialage mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT cavallinlena mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT ferreiradaniel mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT knapskogannebrita mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT selbækgeir mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT brækhusanne mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT saltvedtingvild mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT westmaneric mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis
AT engedalknut mriassessedatrophysubtypesinalzheimersdiseaseandthecognitivereservehypothesis