Cargando…

Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Rachel H., Bajos, Nathalie, Slaymaker, Emma, Wellings, Kaye, Mercer, Catherine H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412
_version_ 1783271470257930240
author Scott, Rachel H.
Bajos, Nathalie
Slaymaker, Emma
Wellings, Kaye
Mercer, Catherine H.
author_facet Scott, Rachel H.
Bajos, Nathalie
Slaymaker, Emma
Wellings, Kaye
Mercer, Catherine H.
author_sort Scott, Rachel H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France. METHODS: Data were analysed for 17–29 year-olds in Britain’s third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010–2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status–educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group–and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome. RESULTS: For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people’s sexual and reproductive behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56431092017-10-30 Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage Scott, Rachel H. Bajos, Nathalie Slaymaker, Emma Wellings, Kaye Mercer, Catherine H. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France. METHODS: Data were analysed for 17–29 year-olds in Britain’s third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010–2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status–educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group–and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome. RESULTS: For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people’s sexual and reproductive behaviours. Public Library of Science 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643109/ /pubmed/29036209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412 Text en © 2017 Scott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scott, Rachel H.
Bajos, Nathalie
Slaymaker, Emma
Wellings, Kaye
Mercer, Catherine H.
Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title_full Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title_fullStr Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title_full_unstemmed Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title_short Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
title_sort understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in britain and france: examining the contribution of social disadvantage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412
work_keys_str_mv AT scottrachelh understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage
AT bajosnathalie understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage
AT slaymakeremma understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage
AT wellingskaye understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage
AT mercercatherineh understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage