Cargando…
Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage
OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412 |
_version_ | 1783271470257930240 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Rachel H. Bajos, Nathalie Slaymaker, Emma Wellings, Kaye Mercer, Catherine H. |
author_facet | Scott, Rachel H. Bajos, Nathalie Slaymaker, Emma Wellings, Kaye Mercer, Catherine H. |
author_sort | Scott, Rachel H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France. METHODS: Data were analysed for 17–29 year-olds in Britain’s third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010–2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status–educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group–and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome. RESULTS: For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people’s sexual and reproductive behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5643109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56431092017-10-30 Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage Scott, Rachel H. Bajos, Nathalie Slaymaker, Emma Wellings, Kaye Mercer, Catherine H. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with sexual activity, contraceptive-use, pregnancy and abortion among young people. Less is known about whether the strength of the association differs for each outcome, between men and women, or cross-nationally. We investigate this using contemporaneous national probability survey data from Britain and France. METHODS: Data were analysed for 17–29 year-olds in Britain’s third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, n = 5959) undertaken 2010–2012, and the 2010 French Fertility, Contraception and Sexual Dysfunction survey (FECOND, n = 3027). For each country, we estimated the gender-specific prevalence of sex before-16, contraceptive-use, conception before-20, and abortion in the event of conception, and used logistic regression to examine associations between two measures of socioeconomic status–educational-level and parental socioeconomic-group–and each outcome. We tested for interactions between socioeconomic characteristics and country, and socioeconomic characteristics and gender, for each outcome. RESULTS: For each outcome, Britain and France differed with regard to prevalence but associations with socioeconomic characteristics were similar. Respondents of higher educational level, and, less consistently, with parents from higher socioeconomic-groups, were less likely to report sex before-16 (Britain, men: adjusted OR (aOR) 0.5, women: aOR 0.5; France, men: aOR 0.5, women: aOR 0.5), no contraception at first sex (Britain, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.6; France, men: aOR 0.4, women: aOR 0.4), pregnancy before-20 (Britain: aOR 0.3; France: aOR 0.1), and in Britain, a birth rather than an abortion in the event of conception (Britain: aOR 3.1). We found no strong evidence of variation in the magnitude of the associations with socioeconomic characteristics by country or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Population level differences in conception and abortion rates between the two countries may partly be driven by the larger proportion of the population that is disadvantaged in Britain. This research highlights the role intra-country comparisons can play in understanding young people’s sexual and reproductive behaviours. Public Library of Science 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643109/ /pubmed/29036209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412 Text en © 2017 Scott et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scott, Rachel H. Bajos, Nathalie Slaymaker, Emma Wellings, Kaye Mercer, Catherine H. Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title | Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title_full | Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title_fullStr | Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title_short | Understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in Britain and France: Examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
title_sort | understanding differences in conception and abortion rates among under-20 year olds in britain and france: examining the contribution of social disadvantage |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottrachelh understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage AT bajosnathalie understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage AT slaymakeremma understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage AT wellingskaye understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage AT mercercatherineh understandingdifferencesinconceptionandabortionratesamongunder20yearoldsinbritainandfranceexaminingthecontributionofsocialdisadvantage |