Cargando…

3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araie, Hiroaki, Sakamaki, Ippei, Matsuda, Yasufumi, Tai, Katsunori, Ikegaya, Satoshi, Itoh, Kazuhiro, Kishi, Shinji, Oiwa, Kana, Okura, Miyuki, Tasaki, Toshiki, Hosono, Naoko, Ueda, Takanori, Yamauchi, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16
_version_ 1783271481624494080
author Araie, Hiroaki
Sakamaki, Ippei
Matsuda, Yasufumi
Tai, Katsunori
Ikegaya, Satoshi
Itoh, Kazuhiro
Kishi, Shinji
Oiwa, Kana
Okura, Miyuki
Tasaki, Toshiki
Hosono, Naoko
Ueda, Takanori
Yamauchi, Takahiro
author_facet Araie, Hiroaki
Sakamaki, Ippei
Matsuda, Yasufumi
Tai, Katsunori
Ikegaya, Satoshi
Itoh, Kazuhiro
Kishi, Shinji
Oiwa, Kana
Okura, Miyuki
Tasaki, Toshiki
Hosono, Naoko
Ueda, Takanori
Yamauchi, Takahiro
author_sort Araie, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to our institution between 2004 and 2013 were examined. The patients received either R(375 mg/m(2), day 1)-THP-COP (pirarubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5) or R-CHOP (adriamicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5). The doses of chemotherapeutic agents were adjusted depending on the patient's age and associated complications. The treatment was performed for 6 to 8 cycles. RESULTS: Among 74 patients with DLBCL (median 76, range 65-90 years; male 39, female 35), 29 received R-THP-COP, while 45 received R-CHOP. The overall response rates were 94.6% (complete response 86.4%, partial response 8.1%). The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 77.6% and 68.5% for the R-THP-COP regimen and 79.2% and 78.9% for R-CHOP, respectively. No significant differences were found between these two regimens regarding the clinical efficacies. The most frequent adverse event was neutropenia (72.4% for the R-THP-COP regimen, 88.9% for the R-CHOP regimen). The cardiac function as evaluated by ejection fraction values was not impaired in either regimen. CONCLUSION: R-THP-COP was effective and safe as an alternative to R-CHOP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56431662017-10-18 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis Araie, Hiroaki Sakamaki, Ippei Matsuda, Yasufumi Tai, Katsunori Ikegaya, Satoshi Itoh, Kazuhiro Kishi, Shinji Oiwa, Kana Okura, Miyuki Tasaki, Toshiki Hosono, Naoko Ueda, Takanori Yamauchi, Takahiro Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to our institution between 2004 and 2013 were examined. The patients received either R(375 mg/m(2), day 1)-THP-COP (pirarubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5) or R-CHOP (adriamicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5). The doses of chemotherapeutic agents were adjusted depending on the patient's age and associated complications. The treatment was performed for 6 to 8 cycles. RESULTS: Among 74 patients with DLBCL (median 76, range 65-90 years; male 39, female 35), 29 received R-THP-COP, while 45 received R-CHOP. The overall response rates were 94.6% (complete response 86.4%, partial response 8.1%). The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 77.6% and 68.5% for the R-THP-COP regimen and 79.2% and 78.9% for R-CHOP, respectively. No significant differences were found between these two regimens regarding the clinical efficacies. The most frequent adverse event was neutropenia (72.4% for the R-THP-COP regimen, 88.9% for the R-CHOP regimen). The cardiac function as evaluated by ejection fraction values was not impaired in either regimen. CONCLUSION: R-THP-COP was effective and safe as an alternative to R-CHOP. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017-08-21 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5643166/ /pubmed/28824057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The Internal Medicine is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Araie, Hiroaki
Sakamaki, Ippei
Matsuda, Yasufumi
Tai, Katsunori
Ikegaya, Satoshi
Itoh, Kazuhiro
Kishi, Shinji
Oiwa, Kana
Okura, Miyuki
Tasaki, Toshiki
Hosono, Naoko
Ueda, Takanori
Yamauchi, Takahiro
3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title_full 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title_fullStr 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title_short 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
title_sort 3a comparison between r-thp-cop and r-chop regimens for the treatment of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma in old patients: a single-institution analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16
work_keys_str_mv AT araiehiroaki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT sakamakiippei 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT matsudayasufumi 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT taikatsunori 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT ikegayasatoshi 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT itohkazuhiro 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT kishishinji 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT oiwakana 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT okuramiyuki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT tasakitoshiki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT hosononaoko 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT uedatakanori 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis
AT yamauchitakahiro 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis