Cargando…
3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with dif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16 |
_version_ | 1783271481624494080 |
---|---|
author | Araie, Hiroaki Sakamaki, Ippei Matsuda, Yasufumi Tai, Katsunori Ikegaya, Satoshi Itoh, Kazuhiro Kishi, Shinji Oiwa, Kana Okura, Miyuki Tasaki, Toshiki Hosono, Naoko Ueda, Takanori Yamauchi, Takahiro |
author_facet | Araie, Hiroaki Sakamaki, Ippei Matsuda, Yasufumi Tai, Katsunori Ikegaya, Satoshi Itoh, Kazuhiro Kishi, Shinji Oiwa, Kana Okura, Miyuki Tasaki, Toshiki Hosono, Naoko Ueda, Takanori Yamauchi, Takahiro |
author_sort | Araie, Hiroaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to our institution between 2004 and 2013 were examined. The patients received either R(375 mg/m(2), day 1)-THP-COP (pirarubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5) or R-CHOP (adriamicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5). The doses of chemotherapeutic agents were adjusted depending on the patient's age and associated complications. The treatment was performed for 6 to 8 cycles. RESULTS: Among 74 patients with DLBCL (median 76, range 65-90 years; male 39, female 35), 29 received R-THP-COP, while 45 received R-CHOP. The overall response rates were 94.6% (complete response 86.4%, partial response 8.1%). The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 77.6% and 68.5% for the R-THP-COP regimen and 79.2% and 78.9% for R-CHOP, respectively. No significant differences were found between these two regimens regarding the clinical efficacies. The most frequent adverse event was neutropenia (72.4% for the R-THP-COP regimen, 88.9% for the R-CHOP regimen). The cardiac function as evaluated by ejection fraction values was not impaired in either regimen. CONCLUSION: R-THP-COP was effective and safe as an alternative to R-CHOP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5643166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56431662017-10-18 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis Araie, Hiroaki Sakamaki, Ippei Matsuda, Yasufumi Tai, Katsunori Ikegaya, Satoshi Itoh, Kazuhiro Kishi, Shinji Oiwa, Kana Okura, Miyuki Tasaki, Toshiki Hosono, Naoko Ueda, Takanori Yamauchi, Takahiro Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the clinical efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R)-THP-COP (pirarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) with that of R-CHOP (rituximab, adriamicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) in previously untreated old patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to our institution between 2004 and 2013 were examined. The patients received either R(375 mg/m(2), day 1)-THP-COP (pirarubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5) or R-CHOP (adriamicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1, and prednisolone 100 mg day 1-5). The doses of chemotherapeutic agents were adjusted depending on the patient's age and associated complications. The treatment was performed for 6 to 8 cycles. RESULTS: Among 74 patients with DLBCL (median 76, range 65-90 years; male 39, female 35), 29 received R-THP-COP, while 45 received R-CHOP. The overall response rates were 94.6% (complete response 86.4%, partial response 8.1%). The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 77.6% and 68.5% for the R-THP-COP regimen and 79.2% and 78.9% for R-CHOP, respectively. No significant differences were found between these two regimens regarding the clinical efficacies. The most frequent adverse event was neutropenia (72.4% for the R-THP-COP regimen, 88.9% for the R-CHOP regimen). The cardiac function as evaluated by ejection fraction values was not impaired in either regimen. CONCLUSION: R-THP-COP was effective and safe as an alternative to R-CHOP. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2017-08-21 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5643166/ /pubmed/28824057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The Internal Medicine is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Araie, Hiroaki Sakamaki, Ippei Matsuda, Yasufumi Tai, Katsunori Ikegaya, Satoshi Itoh, Kazuhiro Kishi, Shinji Oiwa, Kana Okura, Miyuki Tasaki, Toshiki Hosono, Naoko Ueda, Takanori Yamauchi, Takahiro 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title | 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title_full | 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title_fullStr | 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title_short | 3A Comparison between R-THP-COP and R-CHOP Regimens for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Old Patients: A Single-institution Analysis |
title_sort | 3a comparison between r-thp-cop and r-chop regimens for the treatment of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma in old patients: a single-institution analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8291-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT araiehiroaki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT sakamakiippei 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT matsudayasufumi 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT taikatsunori 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT ikegayasatoshi 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT itohkazuhiro 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT kishishinji 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT oiwakana 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT okuramiyuki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT tasakitoshiki 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT hosononaoko 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT uedatakanori 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis AT yamauchitakahiro 3acomparisonbetweenrthpcopandrchopregimensforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomainoldpatientsasingleinstitutionanalysis |