Cargando…

Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups

Opportunistic citizen science databases are becoming an important way of gathering information on species distributions. These data are temporally and spatially dispersed and could have limitations regarding biases in the distribution of the observations in space and/or time. In this work, we test t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiago, Patrícia, Ceia-Hasse, Ana, Marques, Tiago A., Capinha, César, Pereira, Henrique M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29038469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13130-8
_version_ 1783271505761665024
author Tiago, Patrícia
Ceia-Hasse, Ana
Marques, Tiago A.
Capinha, César
Pereira, Henrique M.
author_facet Tiago, Patrícia
Ceia-Hasse, Ana
Marques, Tiago A.
Capinha, César
Pereira, Henrique M.
author_sort Tiago, Patrícia
collection PubMed
description Opportunistic citizen science databases are becoming an important way of gathering information on species distributions. These data are temporally and spatially dispersed and could have limitations regarding biases in the distribution of the observations in space and/or time. In this work, we test the influence of landscape variables in the distribution of citizen science observations for eight taxonomic groups. We use data collected through a Portuguese citizen science database (biodiversity4all.org). We use a zero-inflated negative binomial regression to model the distribution of observations as a function of a set of variables representing the landscape features plausibly influencing the spatial distribution of the records. Results suggest that the density of paths is the most important variable, having a statistically significant positive relationship with number of observations for seven of the eight taxa considered. Wetland coverage was also identified as having a significant, positive relationship, for birds, amphibians and reptiles, and mammals. Our results highlight that the distribution of species observations, in citizen science projects, is spatially biased. Higher frequency of observations is driven largely by accessibility and by the presence of water bodies. We conclude that efforts are required to increase the spatial evenness of sampling effort from volunteers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56433222017-10-19 Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups Tiago, Patrícia Ceia-Hasse, Ana Marques, Tiago A. Capinha, César Pereira, Henrique M. Sci Rep Article Opportunistic citizen science databases are becoming an important way of gathering information on species distributions. These data are temporally and spatially dispersed and could have limitations regarding biases in the distribution of the observations in space and/or time. In this work, we test the influence of landscape variables in the distribution of citizen science observations for eight taxonomic groups. We use data collected through a Portuguese citizen science database (biodiversity4all.org). We use a zero-inflated negative binomial regression to model the distribution of observations as a function of a set of variables representing the landscape features plausibly influencing the spatial distribution of the records. Results suggest that the density of paths is the most important variable, having a statistically significant positive relationship with number of observations for seven of the eight taxa considered. Wetland coverage was also identified as having a significant, positive relationship, for birds, amphibians and reptiles, and mammals. Our results highlight that the distribution of species observations, in citizen science projects, is spatially biased. Higher frequency of observations is driven largely by accessibility and by the presence of water bodies. We conclude that efforts are required to increase the spatial evenness of sampling effort from volunteers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643322/ /pubmed/29038469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13130-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tiago, Patrícia
Ceia-Hasse, Ana
Marques, Tiago A.
Capinha, César
Pereira, Henrique M.
Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title_full Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title_fullStr Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title_full_unstemmed Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title_short Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
title_sort spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29038469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13130-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tiagopatricia spatialdistributionofcitizensciencecasuisticobservationsfordifferenttaxonomicgroups
AT ceiahasseana spatialdistributionofcitizensciencecasuisticobservationsfordifferenttaxonomicgroups
AT marquestiagoa spatialdistributionofcitizensciencecasuisticobservationsfordifferenttaxonomicgroups
AT capinhacesar spatialdistributionofcitizensciencecasuisticobservationsfordifferenttaxonomicgroups
AT pereirahenriquem spatialdistributionofcitizensciencecasuisticobservationsfordifferenttaxonomicgroups