Cargando…

Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells

Besides its role in homologous recombination, the tumor suppressor BRCA2 protects stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. Defective fork stability contributes to chemotherapeutic sensitivity of BRCA2-defective tumors by yet-elusive mechanisms. Using DNA fiber spreading and direct vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mijic, Sofija, Zellweger, Ralph, Chappidi, Nagaraja, Berti, Matteo, Jacobs, Kurt, Mutreja, Karun, Ursich, Sebastian, Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab, Nussenzweig, Andre, Janscak, Pavel, Lopes, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29038466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01164-5
_version_ 1783271552764084224
author Mijic, Sofija
Zellweger, Ralph
Chappidi, Nagaraja
Berti, Matteo
Jacobs, Kurt
Mutreja, Karun
Ursich, Sebastian
Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab
Nussenzweig, Andre
Janscak, Pavel
Lopes, Massimo
author_facet Mijic, Sofija
Zellweger, Ralph
Chappidi, Nagaraja
Berti, Matteo
Jacobs, Kurt
Mutreja, Karun
Ursich, Sebastian
Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab
Nussenzweig, Andre
Janscak, Pavel
Lopes, Massimo
author_sort Mijic, Sofija
collection PubMed
description Besides its role in homologous recombination, the tumor suppressor BRCA2 protects stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. Defective fork stability contributes to chemotherapeutic sensitivity of BRCA2-defective tumors by yet-elusive mechanisms. Using DNA fiber spreading and direct visualization of replication intermediates, we report that reversed replication forks are entry points for fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells. Besides MRE11 and PTIP, we show that RAD52 promotes stalled fork degradation and chromosomal breakage in BRCA2-defective cells. Inactivation of these factors restores reversed fork frequency and chromosome integrity in BRCA2-defective cells. Conversely, impairing fork reversal prevents fork degradation, but increases chromosomal breakage, uncoupling fork protection, and chromosome stability. We propose that BRCA2 is dispensable for RAD51-mediated fork reversal, but assembles stable RAD51 nucleofilaments on regressed arms, to protect them from degradation. Our data uncover the physiopathological relevance of fork reversal and illuminate a complex interplay of homologous recombination factors in fork remodeling and stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56435412017-10-18 Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells Mijic, Sofija Zellweger, Ralph Chappidi, Nagaraja Berti, Matteo Jacobs, Kurt Mutreja, Karun Ursich, Sebastian Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab Nussenzweig, Andre Janscak, Pavel Lopes, Massimo Nat Commun Article Besides its role in homologous recombination, the tumor suppressor BRCA2 protects stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. Defective fork stability contributes to chemotherapeutic sensitivity of BRCA2-defective tumors by yet-elusive mechanisms. Using DNA fiber spreading and direct visualization of replication intermediates, we report that reversed replication forks are entry points for fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells. Besides MRE11 and PTIP, we show that RAD52 promotes stalled fork degradation and chromosomal breakage in BRCA2-defective cells. Inactivation of these factors restores reversed fork frequency and chromosome integrity in BRCA2-defective cells. Conversely, impairing fork reversal prevents fork degradation, but increases chromosomal breakage, uncoupling fork protection, and chromosome stability. We propose that BRCA2 is dispensable for RAD51-mediated fork reversal, but assembles stable RAD51 nucleofilaments on regressed arms, to protect them from degradation. Our data uncover the physiopathological relevance of fork reversal and illuminate a complex interplay of homologous recombination factors in fork remodeling and stability. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5643541/ /pubmed/29038466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01164-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mijic, Sofija
Zellweger, Ralph
Chappidi, Nagaraja
Berti, Matteo
Jacobs, Kurt
Mutreja, Karun
Ursich, Sebastian
Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab
Nussenzweig, Andre
Janscak, Pavel
Lopes, Massimo
Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title_full Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title_fullStr Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title_full_unstemmed Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title_short Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells
title_sort replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in brca2-defective cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29038466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01164-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mijicsofija replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT zellwegerralph replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT chappidinagaraja replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT bertimatteo replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT jacobskurt replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT mutrejakarun replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT ursichsebastian replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT raychaudhuriarnab replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT nussenzweigandre replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT janscakpavel replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells
AT lopesmassimo replicationforkreversaltriggersforkdegradationinbrca2defectivecells