Cargando…

Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS). METHODS: From March 2009...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Xiang, Xu, Song-Tao, Huang, Yu-Hua, Wei, Xue-Dong, Zhang, Jiang-Lei, Wang, Liang-Liang, Pu, Jin-Xian, Hou, Jian-Quan, Yan, Chun-Yin, Cui, Feng-Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.11.016
_version_ 1783271606168059904
author Ding, Xiang
Xu, Song-Tao
Huang, Yu-Hua
Wei, Xue-Dong
Zhang, Jiang-Lei
Wang, Liang-Liang
Pu, Jin-Xian
Hou, Jian-Quan
Yan, Chun-Yin
Cui, Feng-Mei
author_facet Ding, Xiang
Xu, Song-Tao
Huang, Yu-Hua
Wei, Xue-Dong
Zhang, Jiang-Lei
Wang, Liang-Liang
Pu, Jin-Xian
Hou, Jian-Quan
Yan, Chun-Yin
Cui, Feng-Mei
author_sort Ding, Xiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS). METHODS: From March 2009 to May 2014, 36 consecutive patients with caliceal diverticular calculi were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients underwent MPCNL, and 15 were treated by F-URS. All procedures were performed by one surgical group, which ensured relatively constant parameters. Patient characteristics, operative time, hospital stay after surgery, stone-free rate, symptomatic improvement rate, complications, diverticular obliteration, and stone composition were analyzed retrospectively in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patient preoperative variables were comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean operative time was 136.9 ± 22.8 min in the MPCNL group and 117.3 ± 24.3 min in the F-URS group (P = 0.019). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the MPCNL group than in the F-URS group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.010). The stone-free rates after MPCNL and F-URS were 90.5% (19/21) and 60.0% (9/15), respectively (P = 0.046). Additionally, 71.4% (15/21) of patients in the MPCNL group and 46.7% (7/15) of patients in the F-URS group had symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.175); the rates of complications in the 2 groups were 19.0% (4/21) and 13.3% (2/15), respectively (P = 0.650). Complete diverticular obliteration was achieved in 16 (76.2%) cases in the MPCNL group and 5 (33.3%) cases in the F-URS group (P = 0.017). The distributions of calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite in the stones were 66.7% (14/21) and 33.3% (7/21), respectively, in the MPCNL group; however, the distributions in the F-URS group were 46.7% (7/15) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (P = 0.310). CONCLUSION: MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi. However, F-URS is an alternative technique in selected patients with a patent infundibulum, despite lower stone-free rates than with MPCNL. Fulguration of the diverticular lining with a high-power holmium laser and permitting the cavity to collapse are useful to increase the chance of diverticular obliteration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5643770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56437702017-10-23 Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy Ding, Xiang Xu, Song-Tao Huang, Yu-Hua Wei, Xue-Dong Zhang, Jiang-Lei Wang, Liang-Liang Pu, Jin-Xian Hou, Jian-Quan Yan, Chun-Yin Cui, Feng-Mei Chronic Dis Transl Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS). METHODS: From March 2009 to May 2014, 36 consecutive patients with caliceal diverticular calculi were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients underwent MPCNL, and 15 were treated by F-URS. All procedures were performed by one surgical group, which ensured relatively constant parameters. Patient characteristics, operative time, hospital stay after surgery, stone-free rate, symptomatic improvement rate, complications, diverticular obliteration, and stone composition were analyzed retrospectively in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patient preoperative variables were comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean operative time was 136.9 ± 22.8 min in the MPCNL group and 117.3 ± 24.3 min in the F-URS group (P = 0.019). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the MPCNL group than in the F-URS group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.010). The stone-free rates after MPCNL and F-URS were 90.5% (19/21) and 60.0% (9/15), respectively (P = 0.046). Additionally, 71.4% (15/21) of patients in the MPCNL group and 46.7% (7/15) of patients in the F-URS group had symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.175); the rates of complications in the 2 groups were 19.0% (4/21) and 13.3% (2/15), respectively (P = 0.650). Complete diverticular obliteration was achieved in 16 (76.2%) cases in the MPCNL group and 5 (33.3%) cases in the F-URS group (P = 0.017). The distributions of calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite in the stones were 66.7% (14/21) and 33.3% (7/21), respectively, in the MPCNL group; however, the distributions in the F-URS group were 46.7% (7/15) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (P = 0.310). CONCLUSION: MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi. However, F-URS is an alternative technique in selected patients with a patent infundibulum, despite lower stone-free rates than with MPCNL. Fulguration of the diverticular lining with a high-power holmium laser and permitting the cavity to collapse are useful to increase the chance of diverticular obliteration. KeAi Publishing 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5643770/ /pubmed/29063050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.11.016 Text en © 2016 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ding, Xiang
Xu, Song-Tao
Huang, Yu-Hua
Wei, Xue-Dong
Zhang, Jiang-Lei
Wang, Liang-Liang
Pu, Jin-Xian
Hou, Jian-Quan
Yan, Chun-Yin
Cui, Feng-Mei
Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_full Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_fullStr Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_short Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
title_sort management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.11.016
work_keys_str_mv AT dingxiang managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT xusongtao managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT huangyuhua managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT weixuedong managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT zhangjianglei managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT wangliangliang managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT pujinxian managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT houjianquan managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT yanchunyin managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy
AT cuifengmei managementofsymptomaticcalicealdiverticularcalculiminimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusflexibleureterorenoscopy