Cargando…
Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort()
OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of primary drug prevention of fractures due to osteoporosis in patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital, in a medium-sized city, admitted with osteoporotic fractures. Moreover, to identify the incidence of prescribing secondary prophylaxis after the firs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.010 |
_version_ | 1783271624360853504 |
---|---|
author | Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Carvalho, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Oliveira, Luiz Felippe Mokdeci Martins de Ferreira, Anmy Gil Amaral, Rita de Cássia Santana do Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de |
author_facet | Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Carvalho, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Oliveira, Luiz Felippe Mokdeci Martins de Ferreira, Anmy Gil Amaral, Rita de Cássia Santana do Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de |
author_sort | Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of primary drug prevention of fractures due to osteoporosis in patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital, in a medium-sized city, admitted with osteoporotic fractures. Moreover, to identify the incidence of prescribing secondary prophylaxis after the first fracture event. At the same time, the prevalence of risk factors for such fractures as described in the literature was measured. METHODS: This longitudinal prospective study was based on a cohort of patients admitted in a tertiary teaching hospital from October 2015 to January 2016. Patients with low energy or fragility fractures were included in the study regardless of gender or race, over the age of 50 years. All patients who did not have these characteristics were excluded. The follow-up lasted four months. Serial questionnaires were applied at admission and in the follow-up consultations at four to eight weeks and at 16 weeks. RESULTS: Only one patient reported receiving treatment with specific drugs for the disease before hospital admission, resulting in a prevalence of primary chemoprophylaxis of only 2.27%. No patient was prescribed medication for the treatment of osteoporosis after the fracture. The prevalence of risk factors was similar to those found in the literature review. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the frequency of primary and secondary osteoporosis chemoprophylaxis in patients who were admitted with fragility fractures was low, as well as the early indication of drug treatment after the first fracture. The prevalence of fragility fracture risk factors is similar to those reported in the literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5643888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56438882017-10-23 Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Carvalho, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Oliveira, Luiz Felippe Mokdeci Martins de Ferreira, Anmy Gil Amaral, Rita de Cássia Santana do Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of primary drug prevention of fractures due to osteoporosis in patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital, in a medium-sized city, admitted with osteoporotic fractures. Moreover, to identify the incidence of prescribing secondary prophylaxis after the first fracture event. At the same time, the prevalence of risk factors for such fractures as described in the literature was measured. METHODS: This longitudinal prospective study was based on a cohort of patients admitted in a tertiary teaching hospital from October 2015 to January 2016. Patients with low energy or fragility fractures were included in the study regardless of gender or race, over the age of 50 years. All patients who did not have these characteristics were excluded. The follow-up lasted four months. Serial questionnaires were applied at admission and in the follow-up consultations at four to eight weeks and at 16 weeks. RESULTS: Only one patient reported receiving treatment with specific drugs for the disease before hospital admission, resulting in a prevalence of primary chemoprophylaxis of only 2.27%. No patient was prescribed medication for the treatment of osteoporosis after the fracture. The prevalence of risk factors was similar to those found in the literature review. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the frequency of primary and secondary osteoporosis chemoprophylaxis in patients who were admitted with fragility fractures was low, as well as the early indication of drug treatment after the first fracture. The prevalence of fragility fracture risk factors is similar to those reported in the literature. Elsevier 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5643888/ /pubmed/29062817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.010 Text en © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Souza, Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Carvalho, Luiz Guilherme Vidal Assad de Oliveira, Luiz Felippe Mokdeci Martins de Ferreira, Anmy Gil Amaral, Rita de Cássia Santana do Oliveira, Valdeci Manoel de Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title | Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title_full | Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title_fullStr | Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title_short | Primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
title_sort | primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures prophylaxis: evaluation of a prospective cohort() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5643888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT souzabrunogoncalvesschrodere primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort AT carvalholuizguilhermevidalassadde primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort AT oliveiraluizfelippemokdecimartinsde primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort AT ferreiraanmygil primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort AT amaralritadecassiasantanado primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort AT oliveiravaldecimanoelde primaryandsecondaryosteoporoticfracturesprophylaxisevaluationofaprospectivecohort |