Cargando…

An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are capable of effectively terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmia and are the most effective way to prevent sudden cardiac death. However, some evidences demonstrated that both anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and ICD shock can also bring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Ye, Gu, Xiang, Xu, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0695-y
_version_ 1783271671795286016
author Zhu, Ye
Gu, Xiang
Xu, Chao
author_facet Zhu, Ye
Gu, Xiang
Xu, Chao
author_sort Zhu, Ye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are capable of effectively terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmia and are the most effective way to prevent sudden cardiac death. However, some evidences demonstrated that both anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and ICD shock can also bring adverse prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old Han Chinese man with prior ICD implantation was admitted to our hospital because of frequent ICD shocks. Although intravenous amiodarone and esmolol succinate were administered daily, the patient suffered 155 episodes of VT/VF during 8 weeks after implantation. After repeated discharge of the device, the pacing threshold of the patient increased gradually. Considering the inappropriate increase of the pacing threshold, we decided to reposition the right ventricular (RV) lead with good sensing and threshold parameters confirmed. Subsequent 22 months interrogation follow-up revealed a stable lead position and electrical specifications. Furthermore, antiarrhythmic drugs were maximally increased, while ATP burst was remarkably decreased and the inappropriate ICD shock never occurred until now. CONCLUSION: An inappropriate pacing threshold was increased secondary to repeated ICD electrical storm. A timely active lead position adjustment reduced the pacing threshold and eliminated the risk of premature battery depletion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-017-0695-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56441312017-10-26 An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator Zhu, Ye Gu, Xiang Xu, Chao BMC Cardiovasc Disord Case Report BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are capable of effectively terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmia and are the most effective way to prevent sudden cardiac death. However, some evidences demonstrated that both anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and ICD shock can also bring adverse prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old Han Chinese man with prior ICD implantation was admitted to our hospital because of frequent ICD shocks. Although intravenous amiodarone and esmolol succinate were administered daily, the patient suffered 155 episodes of VT/VF during 8 weeks after implantation. After repeated discharge of the device, the pacing threshold of the patient increased gradually. Considering the inappropriate increase of the pacing threshold, we decided to reposition the right ventricular (RV) lead with good sensing and threshold parameters confirmed. Subsequent 22 months interrogation follow-up revealed a stable lead position and electrical specifications. Furthermore, antiarrhythmic drugs were maximally increased, while ATP burst was remarkably decreased and the inappropriate ICD shock never occurred until now. CONCLUSION: An inappropriate pacing threshold was increased secondary to repeated ICD electrical storm. A timely active lead position adjustment reduced the pacing threshold and eliminated the risk of premature battery depletion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-017-0695-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5644131/ /pubmed/29037154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0695-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Zhu, Ye
Gu, Xiang
Xu, Chao
An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_full An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_fullStr An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_full_unstemmed An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_short An inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
title_sort inappropriate pacing threshold increase after repeated electrical storm in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0695-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuye aninappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT guxiang aninappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT xuchao aninappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT zhuye inappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT guxiang inappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT xuchao inappropriatepacingthresholdincreaseafterrepeatedelectricalstorminapatientwithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator