Cargando…

Hemodialysis Patients’ Information and Associated Characteristics

INTRODUCTION: of this study was to explore characteristics associated with hemodialysis patients’ degree of information. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample of the study included 650 patients undergoing hemodialysis. For data collection a questionnaire specially designed for the needs of the research w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polikandrioti, Maria, Koutelekos, Ioannis, Vasilopoulos, George, Babatsikou, Fotoula, Gerogianni, Georgia, Zyga, Sofia, Panoutsopoulos, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109663
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2017.29.182-187
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: of this study was to explore characteristics associated with hemodialysis patients’ degree of information. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample of the study included 650 patients undergoing hemodialysis. For data collection a questionnaire specially designed for the needs of the research was used. More specifically, socio-demographic, clinical and other patients’ characteristics were associated with the degree of information as it was reported by patients. RESULTS: of the 650 participants, 55.4% was men while 58.6% of the sample was aged over 60 years. Regarding information level, results showed that only 9.8% was “little” or “not all” informed about their health problem, 61,7% was “enough” informed whereas 28.5% were “very” informed. Statistically significant association was observed between degree of information and age (p=<0.001), family status (p=0.005), education (p=0.001), job (p=0.005) and number of children (p=0.019). In terms of clinical characteristics, statistically significant association was observed between the degree of information and whether patients had other disease or not (p=0.037), whether patients reported adherence to treatment guidelines (p=<0.001). Finally, statistically significant association was observed between the degree of information and relations with nursing staff (p=<0.001), doctors (p=0.007) and other patients (p=0.003), and whether patients faced difficulties in social (p=0.001) and family environment (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Health professionals when planning information interventions for orienting hemodialysis patients is increasingly important to evaluate socio-demographic, clinical and other patients ‘ characteristics and incorporate them in their project.