Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block

BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized the surgical outcomes following epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the long-term outcomes of a minimally invasive epicardial approach using a subxipho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Roberto, da Silva, Katia Regina, Martinelli Filho, Martino, Carrillo, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28876373
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170126
_version_ 1783271691289362432
author Costa, Roberto
da Silva, Katia Regina
Martinelli Filho, Martino
Carrillo, Roger
author_facet Costa, Roberto
da Silva, Katia Regina
Martinelli Filho, Martino
Carrillo, Roger
author_sort Costa, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized the surgical outcomes following epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the long-term outcomes of a minimally invasive epicardial approach using a subxiphoid access for pacemaker implantation in neonates. METHODS: Between July 2002 and February 2015, 16 consecutive neonates underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation due to CCAVB. Among these, 12 (75.0%) had congenital heart defects associated with CCAVB. The patients had a mean age of 4.7 ± 5.3 days and nine (56.3%) were female. Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads were implanted in all patients through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and fixed on the diaphragmatic ventricular surface. The pulse generator was placed in an epigastric submuscular position. RESULTS: All procedures were successful, with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time was 90.2 ± 16.8 minutes. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 4.1 ± 3.9 years. Three children underwent pulse generator replacement due to normal battery depletion at 4.0, 7.2, and 9.0 years of age without the need of ventricular lead replacement. There were two deaths at 12 and 325 days after pacemaker implantation due to bleeding from thrombolytic use and progressive refractory heart failure, respectively. CONCLUSION: Epicardial pacemaker implantation through a subxiphoid approach in neonates with CCAVB is technically feasible and associated with excellent surgical outcomes and pacing lead longevity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56442132017-10-24 Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block Costa, Roberto da Silva, Katia Regina Martinelli Filho, Martino Carrillo, Roger Arq Bras Cardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized the surgical outcomes following epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the long-term outcomes of a minimally invasive epicardial approach using a subxiphoid access for pacemaker implantation in neonates. METHODS: Between July 2002 and February 2015, 16 consecutive neonates underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation due to CCAVB. Among these, 12 (75.0%) had congenital heart defects associated with CCAVB. The patients had a mean age of 4.7 ± 5.3 days and nine (56.3%) were female. Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads were implanted in all patients through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and fixed on the diaphragmatic ventricular surface. The pulse generator was placed in an epigastric submuscular position. RESULTS: All procedures were successful, with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time was 90.2 ± 16.8 minutes. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 4.1 ± 3.9 years. Three children underwent pulse generator replacement due to normal battery depletion at 4.0, 7.2, and 9.0 years of age without the need of ventricular lead replacement. There were two deaths at 12 and 325 days after pacemaker implantation due to bleeding from thrombolytic use and progressive refractory heart failure, respectively. CONCLUSION: Epicardial pacemaker implantation through a subxiphoid approach in neonates with CCAVB is technically feasible and associated with excellent surgical outcomes and pacing lead longevity. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5644213/ /pubmed/28876373 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170126 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Costa, Roberto
da Silva, Katia Regina
Martinelli Filho, Martino
Carrillo, Roger
Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title_full Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title_short Minimally Invasive Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates with Congenital Heart Block
title_sort minimally invasive epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates with congenital heart block
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28876373
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170126
work_keys_str_mv AT costaroberto minimallyinvasiveepicardialpacemakerimplantationinneonateswithcongenitalheartblock
AT dasilvakatiaregina minimallyinvasiveepicardialpacemakerimplantationinneonateswithcongenitalheartblock
AT martinellifilhomartino minimallyinvasiveepicardialpacemakerimplantationinneonateswithcongenitalheartblock
AT carrilloroger minimallyinvasiveepicardialpacemakerimplantationinneonateswithcongenitalheartblock