Cargando…

Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research

INTRODUCTION: Sex differences in brain biochemistry, physiology, structure, and function have been gaining increasing attention in the scientific community. Males and females can have different responses to medications, diseases, and environmental variables. A small number of the approximately 7500...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauer, Amanda Marie, Schrode, Katrina Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937014
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_12_17
_version_ 1783271722699456512
author Lauer, Amanda Marie
Schrode, Katrina Marie
author_facet Lauer, Amanda Marie
Schrode, Katrina Marie
author_sort Lauer, Amanda Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sex differences in brain biochemistry, physiology, structure, and function have been gaining increasing attention in the scientific community. Males and females can have different responses to medications, diseases, and environmental variables. A small number of the approximately 7500 studies of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) have identified sex differences, but the mechanisms and characterization of these differences have not been thoroughly studied. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a mandate in 2015 to include sex as a biological variable in all NIH-funded research beginning in January 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, the representation of sex as a biological variable in preclinical and basic studies of NIHL was quantified for a 5-year period from January 2011 to December 2015 prior to the implementation of the NIH mandate. RESULTS: The analysis of 210 basic and preclinical studies showed that when sex is specified, experiments are predominantly performed on male animals. DISCUSSION: This bias is present in studies completed in the United States and foreign institutions, and the proportion of studies using only male participants has actually increased over the 5-year period examined. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the need to invest resources in studying NIHL in both sexes to better understand how sex shapes the outcomes and to optimize treatment and prevention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56443792017-10-31 Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research Lauer, Amanda Marie Schrode, Katrina Marie Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: Sex differences in brain biochemistry, physiology, structure, and function have been gaining increasing attention in the scientific community. Males and females can have different responses to medications, diseases, and environmental variables. A small number of the approximately 7500 studies of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) have identified sex differences, but the mechanisms and characterization of these differences have not been thoroughly studied. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a mandate in 2015 to include sex as a biological variable in all NIH-funded research beginning in January 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, the representation of sex as a biological variable in preclinical and basic studies of NIHL was quantified for a 5-year period from January 2011 to December 2015 prior to the implementation of the NIH mandate. RESULTS: The analysis of 210 basic and preclinical studies showed that when sex is specified, experiments are predominantly performed on male animals. DISCUSSION: This bias is present in studies completed in the United States and foreign institutions, and the proportion of studies using only male participants has actually increased over the 5-year period examined. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the need to invest resources in studying NIHL in both sexes to better understand how sex shapes the outcomes and to optimize treatment and prevention strategies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5644379/ /pubmed/28937014 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_12_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lauer, Amanda Marie
Schrode, Katrina Marie
Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title_full Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title_fullStr Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title_full_unstemmed Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title_short Sex Bias in Basic and Preclinical Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Research
title_sort sex bias in basic and preclinical noise-induced hearing loss research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937014
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_12_17
work_keys_str_mv AT laueramandamarie sexbiasinbasicandpreclinicalnoiseinducedhearinglossresearch
AT schrodekatrinamarie sexbiasinbasicandpreclinicalnoiseinducedhearinglossresearch