Cargando…
Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17 |
_version_ | 1783271725543194624 |
---|---|
author | Faramarzi, Amir Aghajani, Ali Ghiasian, Leila |
author_facet | Faramarzi, Amir Aghajani, Ali Ghiasian, Leila |
author_sort | Faramarzi, Amir |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than 46 D were included. Calculation of the IOL power was performed by the Lenstar. The implanted IOL in all cases was Acrysof SA60AT. The average absolute value of the differences between the actual and predicted spherical equivalent (SE) of the postoperative refractive error (mean absolute error: MAE) was calculated using 4 formulas (Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T) with optical IOL constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants. RESULTS: The MAE was smallest in the SRK/T formula (0.39 D ± 0.35) followed by those of the Holladay 1 (0.44 D ± 0.32), Haigis (0.45 D ± 0.35) and Hoffer Q (0.5 D ± 0.38) formulas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the MAE among different formulas. The SRK/T formula predicted more eyes within ± 0.5 D of the SE (77.8%) compared to other formulas. CONCLUSION: In eyes with steep corneas, there were no statistically significant differences among the accuracies of the four common IOL power calculation formulas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5644404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56444042017-10-31 Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas Faramarzi, Amir Aghajani, Ali Ghiasian, Leila J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than 46 D were included. Calculation of the IOL power was performed by the Lenstar. The implanted IOL in all cases was Acrysof SA60AT. The average absolute value of the differences between the actual and predicted spherical equivalent (SE) of the postoperative refractive error (mean absolute error: MAE) was calculated using 4 formulas (Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T) with optical IOL constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants. RESULTS: The MAE was smallest in the SRK/T formula (0.39 D ± 0.35) followed by those of the Holladay 1 (0.44 D ± 0.32), Haigis (0.45 D ± 0.35) and Hoffer Q (0.5 D ± 0.38) formulas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the MAE among different formulas. The SRK/T formula predicted more eyes within ± 0.5 D of the SE (77.8%) compared to other formulas. CONCLUSION: In eyes with steep corneas, there were no statistically significant differences among the accuracies of the four common IOL power calculation formulas. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5644404/ /pubmed/29090047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Faramarzi, Amir Aghajani, Ali Ghiasian, Leila Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title | Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title_full | Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title_short | Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas |
title_sort | accuracy of various intraocular lens power calculation formulas in steep corneas |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faramarziamir accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas AT aghajaniali accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas AT ghiasianleila accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas |