Cargando…

Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Amir, Aghajani, Ali, Ghiasian, Leila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090047
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17
_version_ 1783271725543194624
author Faramarzi, Amir
Aghajani, Ali
Ghiasian, Leila
author_facet Faramarzi, Amir
Aghajani, Ali
Ghiasian, Leila
author_sort Faramarzi, Amir
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than 46 D were included. Calculation of the IOL power was performed by the Lenstar. The implanted IOL in all cases was Acrysof SA60AT. The average absolute value of the differences between the actual and predicted spherical equivalent (SE) of the postoperative refractive error (mean absolute error: MAE) was calculated using 4 formulas (Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T) with optical IOL constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants. RESULTS: The MAE was smallest in the SRK/T formula (0.39 D ± 0.35) followed by those of the Holladay 1 (0.44 D ± 0.32), Haigis (0.45 D ± 0.35) and Hoffer Q (0.5 D ± 0.38) formulas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the MAE among different formulas. The SRK/T formula predicted more eyes within ± 0.5 D of the SE (77.8%) compared to other formulas. CONCLUSION: In eyes with steep corneas, there were no statistically significant differences among the accuracies of the four common IOL power calculation formulas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56444042017-10-31 Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas Faramarzi, Amir Aghajani, Ali Ghiasian, Leila J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of four different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for eyes with mean keratometry values greater than 46 diopters (D). METHODS: Forty five eyes from 45 patients who were candidates for senile cataract surgery with mean keratometry values greater than 46 D were included. Calculation of the IOL power was performed by the Lenstar. The implanted IOL in all cases was Acrysof SA60AT. The average absolute value of the differences between the actual and predicted spherical equivalent (SE) of the postoperative refractive error (mean absolute error: MAE) was calculated using 4 formulas (Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T) with optical IOL constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants. RESULTS: The MAE was smallest in the SRK/T formula (0.39 D ± 0.35) followed by those of the Holladay 1 (0.44 D ± 0.32), Haigis (0.45 D ± 0.35) and Hoffer Q (0.5 D ± 0.38) formulas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the MAE among different formulas. The SRK/T formula predicted more eyes within ± 0.5 D of the SE (77.8%) compared to other formulas. CONCLUSION: In eyes with steep corneas, there were no statistically significant differences among the accuracies of the four common IOL power calculation formulas. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5644404/ /pubmed/29090047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Faramarzi, Amir
Aghajani, Ali
Ghiasian, Leila
Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title_full Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title_fullStr Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title_short Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas
title_sort accuracy of various intraocular lens power calculation formulas in steep corneas
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090047
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarziamir accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas
AT aghajaniali accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas
AT ghiasianleila accuracyofvariousintraocularlenspowercalculationformulasinsteepcorneas