Cargando…

Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories

BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the charact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Datema, Tjeerd A.M., Oskam, Linda, Klatser, Paul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS OpenJournals 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3
_version_ 1783271740071215104
author Datema, Tjeerd A.M.
Oskam, Linda
Klatser, Paul R.
author_facet Datema, Tjeerd A.M.
Oskam, Linda
Klatser, Paul R.
author_sort Datema, Tjeerd A.M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the characteristics, suitability and applicability of quality documents in view of the increasing efforts to introduce quality management in laboratories, especially in clinical diagnostic laboratories in low income and middle income countries. This may provide valuable insights for policy makers developing national laboratory policies, and for laboratory managers and quality officers in choosing the most appropriate quality document for upgrading their laboratories. METHOD: We reviewed the history of quality document development and then selected a subset based on their current use. We analysed these documents following a framework for comparison of quality documents that was adapted from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guideline GP26 Quality management system model for clinical laboratory services. RESULTS: Differences were identified between national and international, and non-clinical and clinical quality documents. The most salient findings were the absence of provisions on occurrence management and customer service in almost all non-clinical quality documents, a low number of safety requirements aimed at protecting laboratory personnel in international quality documents and no requirements regarding ethical behaviour in almost all quality documents. CONCLUSION: Each laboratory needs to investigate whether national regulatory standards are present. These are preferred as they most closely suit the needs of laboratories in the country. A laboratory should always use both a standard and a guideline: a standard sums up the requirements to a quality management system, a guideline describes how quality management can be integrated in the laboratory processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56445252017-10-23 Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories Datema, Tjeerd A.M. Oskam, Linda Klatser, Paul R. Afr J Lab Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the characteristics, suitability and applicability of quality documents in view of the increasing efforts to introduce quality management in laboratories, especially in clinical diagnostic laboratories in low income and middle income countries. This may provide valuable insights for policy makers developing national laboratory policies, and for laboratory managers and quality officers in choosing the most appropriate quality document for upgrading their laboratories. METHOD: We reviewed the history of quality document development and then selected a subset based on their current use. We analysed these documents following a framework for comparison of quality documents that was adapted from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guideline GP26 Quality management system model for clinical laboratory services. RESULTS: Differences were identified between national and international, and non-clinical and clinical quality documents. The most salient findings were the absence of provisions on occurrence management and customer service in almost all non-clinical quality documents, a low number of safety requirements aimed at protecting laboratory personnel in international quality documents and no requirements regarding ethical behaviour in almost all quality documents. CONCLUSION: Each laboratory needs to investigate whether national regulatory standards are present. These are preferred as they most closely suit the needs of laboratories in the country. A laboratory should always use both a standard and a guideline: a standard sums up the requirements to a quality management system, a guideline describes how quality management can be integrated in the laboratory processes. AOSIS OpenJournals 2011-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5644525/ /pubmed/29062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3 Text en © 2011. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Datema, Tjeerd A.M.
Oskam, Linda
Klatser, Paul R.
Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title_full Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title_fullStr Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title_full_unstemmed Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title_short Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
title_sort review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3
work_keys_str_mv AT datematjeerdam reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories
AT oskamlinda reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories
AT klatserpaulr reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories