Cargando…
Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories
BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the charact...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS OpenJournals
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3 |
_version_ | 1783271740071215104 |
---|---|
author | Datema, Tjeerd A.M. Oskam, Linda Klatser, Paul R. |
author_facet | Datema, Tjeerd A.M. Oskam, Linda Klatser, Paul R. |
author_sort | Datema, Tjeerd A.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the characteristics, suitability and applicability of quality documents in view of the increasing efforts to introduce quality management in laboratories, especially in clinical diagnostic laboratories in low income and middle income countries. This may provide valuable insights for policy makers developing national laboratory policies, and for laboratory managers and quality officers in choosing the most appropriate quality document for upgrading their laboratories. METHOD: We reviewed the history of quality document development and then selected a subset based on their current use. We analysed these documents following a framework for comparison of quality documents that was adapted from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guideline GP26 Quality management system model for clinical laboratory services. RESULTS: Differences were identified between national and international, and non-clinical and clinical quality documents. The most salient findings were the absence of provisions on occurrence management and customer service in almost all non-clinical quality documents, a low number of safety requirements aimed at protecting laboratory personnel in international quality documents and no requirements regarding ethical behaviour in almost all quality documents. CONCLUSION: Each laboratory needs to investigate whether national regulatory standards are present. These are preferred as they most closely suit the needs of laboratories in the country. A laboratory should always use both a standard and a guideline: a standard sums up the requirements to a quality management system, a guideline describes how quality management can be integrated in the laboratory processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5644525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | AOSIS OpenJournals |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56445252017-10-23 Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories Datema, Tjeerd A.M. Oskam, Linda Klatser, Paul R. Afr J Lab Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The variety and number of laboratory quality standards, guidelines and regulations (hereafter: quality documents) makes it difficult to choose the most suitable one for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system. OBJECTIVES: There is a need to compare the characteristics, suitability and applicability of quality documents in view of the increasing efforts to introduce quality management in laboratories, especially in clinical diagnostic laboratories in low income and middle income countries. This may provide valuable insights for policy makers developing national laboratory policies, and for laboratory managers and quality officers in choosing the most appropriate quality document for upgrading their laboratories. METHOD: We reviewed the history of quality document development and then selected a subset based on their current use. We analysed these documents following a framework for comparison of quality documents that was adapted from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guideline GP26 Quality management system model for clinical laboratory services. RESULTS: Differences were identified between national and international, and non-clinical and clinical quality documents. The most salient findings were the absence of provisions on occurrence management and customer service in almost all non-clinical quality documents, a low number of safety requirements aimed at protecting laboratory personnel in international quality documents and no requirements regarding ethical behaviour in almost all quality documents. CONCLUSION: Each laboratory needs to investigate whether national regulatory standards are present. These are preferred as they most closely suit the needs of laboratories in the country. A laboratory should always use both a standard and a guideline: a standard sums up the requirements to a quality management system, a guideline describes how quality management can be integrated in the laboratory processes. AOSIS OpenJournals 2011-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5644525/ /pubmed/29062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3 Text en © 2011. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Datema, Tjeerd A.M. Oskam, Linda Klatser, Paul R. Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title | Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title_full | Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title_fullStr | Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title_full_unstemmed | Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title_short | Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
title_sort | review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT datematjeerdam reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories AT oskamlinda reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories AT klatserpaulr reviewandcomparisonofqualitystandardsguidelinesandregulationsforlaboratories |