Cargando…

Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive primary bone tumor in humans and is among the most common cancer afflicting dogs. Despite surgical advancements and intensification of chemo- and targeted therapies, the survival outcome for osteosarcoma patients is, as of yet, suboptimal. The presence of metastatic dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varshney, Jyotika, Scott, Milcah C., Largaespada, David A., Subramanian, Subbaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci3010003
_version_ 1783271756152176640
author Varshney, Jyotika
Scott, Milcah C.
Largaespada, David A.
Subramanian, Subbaya
author_facet Varshney, Jyotika
Scott, Milcah C.
Largaespada, David A.
Subramanian, Subbaya
author_sort Varshney, Jyotika
collection PubMed
description Osteosarcoma is an aggressive primary bone tumor in humans and is among the most common cancer afflicting dogs. Despite surgical advancements and intensification of chemo- and targeted therapies, the survival outcome for osteosarcoma patients is, as of yet, suboptimal. The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis or its recurrence after initial therapy is a major factor for the poor outcomes. It is thought that most human and canine patients have at least microscopic metastatic lesions at diagnosis. Osteosarcoma in dogs occurs naturally with greater frequency and shares many biological and clinical similarities with osteosarcoma in humans. From a genetic perspective, osteosarcoma in both humans and dogs is characterized by complex karyotypes with highly variable structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations. Similar molecular abnormalities have been observed in human and canine osteosarcoma. For instance, loss of TP53 and RB regulated pathways are common. While there are several oncogenes that are commonly amplified in both humans and dogs, such as MYC and RAS, no commonly activated proto-oncogene has been identified that could form the basis for targeted therapies. It remains possible that recurrent aberrant gene expression changes due to gene amplification or epigenetic alterations could be uncovered and these could be used for developing new, targeted therapies. However, the remarkably high genomic complexity of osteosarcoma has precluded their definitive identification. Several advantageous murine models of osteosarcoma have been generated. These include spontaneous and genetically engineered mouse models, including a model based on forward genetics and transposon mutagenesis allowing new genes and genetic pathways to be implicated in osteosarcoma development. The proposition of this review is that careful comparative genomic studies between human, canine and mouse models of osteosarcoma may help identify commonly affected and targetable pathways for alternative therapies for osteosarcoma patients. Translational research may be found through a path that begins in mouse models, and then moves through canine patients, and then human patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56446132017-10-18 Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach Varshney, Jyotika Scott, Milcah C. Largaespada, David A. Subramanian, Subbaya Vet Sci Review Osteosarcoma is an aggressive primary bone tumor in humans and is among the most common cancer afflicting dogs. Despite surgical advancements and intensification of chemo- and targeted therapies, the survival outcome for osteosarcoma patients is, as of yet, suboptimal. The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis or its recurrence after initial therapy is a major factor for the poor outcomes. It is thought that most human and canine patients have at least microscopic metastatic lesions at diagnosis. Osteosarcoma in dogs occurs naturally with greater frequency and shares many biological and clinical similarities with osteosarcoma in humans. From a genetic perspective, osteosarcoma in both humans and dogs is characterized by complex karyotypes with highly variable structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations. Similar molecular abnormalities have been observed in human and canine osteosarcoma. For instance, loss of TP53 and RB regulated pathways are common. While there are several oncogenes that are commonly amplified in both humans and dogs, such as MYC and RAS, no commonly activated proto-oncogene has been identified that could form the basis for targeted therapies. It remains possible that recurrent aberrant gene expression changes due to gene amplification or epigenetic alterations could be uncovered and these could be used for developing new, targeted therapies. However, the remarkably high genomic complexity of osteosarcoma has precluded their definitive identification. Several advantageous murine models of osteosarcoma have been generated. These include spontaneous and genetically engineered mouse models, including a model based on forward genetics and transposon mutagenesis allowing new genes and genetic pathways to be implicated in osteosarcoma development. The proposition of this review is that careful comparative genomic studies between human, canine and mouse models of osteosarcoma may help identify commonly affected and targetable pathways for alternative therapies for osteosarcoma patients. Translational research may be found through a path that begins in mouse models, and then moves through canine patients, and then human patients. MDPI 2016-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5644613/ /pubmed/29056713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci3010003 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Varshney, Jyotika
Scott, Milcah C.
Largaespada, David A.
Subramanian, Subbaya
Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title_full Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title_fullStr Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title_short Understanding the Osteosarcoma Pathobiology: A Comparative Oncology Approach
title_sort understanding the osteosarcoma pathobiology: a comparative oncology approach
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci3010003
work_keys_str_mv AT varshneyjyotika understandingtheosteosarcomapathobiologyacomparativeoncologyapproach
AT scottmilcahc understandingtheosteosarcomapathobiologyacomparativeoncologyapproach
AT largaespadadavida understandingtheosteosarcomapathobiologyacomparativeoncologyapproach
AT subramaniansubbaya understandingtheosteosarcomapathobiologyacomparativeoncologyapproach