Cargando…

Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis and treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is required. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing time to treatment for RR-TB and variability using diagnostic testing methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, R., Ford, N., Padgen, P., Cox, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037299
http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0230
_version_ 1783271784652472320
author Boyd, R.
Ford, N.
Padgen, P.
Cox, H.
author_facet Boyd, R.
Ford, N.
Padgen, P.
Cox, H.
author_sort Boyd, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis and treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is required. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing time to treatment for RR-TB and variability using diagnostic testing methods and treatment delivery approach. DESIGN: Studies from 2000 to 2015 reporting time to second-line treatment initiation were selected from PubMed and published conference abstracts. RESULTS: From 53 studies, 83 cohorts (13 034 patients) were included. Overall weighted mean time to treatment from specimen collection was 81 days (95%CI 70–91), and was shorter with ambulatory (57 days, 95%CI 40–74) than hospital-based treatment (86 days, 95%CI 71–102). Time to treatment was shorter with genotypic susceptibility testing (38 days, 95%CI 27–49) than phenotypic testing (108 days, 95%CI 98–117). The mean percentage of diagnosed patients initiating treatment was 76% (95%CI 70–83, range 25–100). CONCLUSION: Time to second-line anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation is extremely variable across studies, and often unnecessarily long. Reduced delays are associated with genotypic testing and ambulatory treatment settings. Routine monitoring of the proportion of diagnosed patients initiating treatment and time to treatment are necessary to identify areas for intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56447402017-11-01 Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis Boyd, R. Ford, N. Padgen, P. Cox, H. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: To reduce transmission and improve patient outcomes, rapid diagnosis and treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is required. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing time to treatment for RR-TB and variability using diagnostic testing methods and treatment delivery approach. DESIGN: Studies from 2000 to 2015 reporting time to second-line treatment initiation were selected from PubMed and published conference abstracts. RESULTS: From 53 studies, 83 cohorts (13 034 patients) were included. Overall weighted mean time to treatment from specimen collection was 81 days (95%CI 70–91), and was shorter with ambulatory (57 days, 95%CI 40–74) than hospital-based treatment (86 days, 95%CI 71–102). Time to treatment was shorter with genotypic susceptibility testing (38 days, 95%CI 27–49) than phenotypic testing (108 days, 95%CI 98–117). The mean percentage of diagnosed patients initiating treatment was 76% (95%CI 70–83, range 25–100). CONCLUSION: Time to second-line anti-tuberculosis treatment initiation is extremely variable across studies, and often unnecessarily long. Reduced delays are associated with genotypic testing and ambulatory treatment settings. Routine monitoring of the proportion of diagnosed patients initiating treatment and time to treatment are necessary to identify areas for intervention. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2017-11 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5644740/ /pubmed/29037299 http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0230 Text en © 2017 Boyd et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Boyd, R.
Ford, N.
Padgen, P.
Cox, H.
Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037299
http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0230
work_keys_str_mv AT boydr timetotreatmentforrifampicinresistanttuberculosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fordn timetotreatmentforrifampicinresistanttuberculosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT padgenp timetotreatmentforrifampicinresistanttuberculosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coxh timetotreatmentforrifampicinresistanttuberculosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis