Cargando…

Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Stem cell regeneration is the holy grail of meniscal tissue repair. Currently, the best treatment is to preserve the original meniscus but if it fails, a partial meniscectomy is indicated to delay the onset of osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors present a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chew, Ernest, Prakash, Rohan, Khan, Wasim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.09.018
_version_ 1783271825409572864
author Chew, Ernest
Prakash, Rohan
Khan, Wasim
author_facet Chew, Ernest
Prakash, Rohan
Khan, Wasim
author_sort Chew, Ernest
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stem cell regeneration is the holy grail of meniscal tissue repair. Currently, the best treatment is to preserve the original meniscus but if it fails, a partial meniscectomy is indicated to delay the onset of osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors present a systematic review to determine the up-to-date evidence underlying the use of mesenchymal stem cells for meniscal regeneration in humans. A search was conducted using the electronic databases of MEDLINE/Pubmed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Search keywords included human, meniscus, stem cells and regeneration. RESULTS: After screening 10 non-duplicate studies, 5 were identified based on title and abstract. 4 were included in the analysis. There were marked differences in the method of stem cell harvest techniques. 3 studies administered stem cells through percutaneous injection into the knee and 1 study used a collagen scaffold. MRI analysis, functional scores and safety were assessed and the longest follow-up period was 2 years. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was most commonly used to assess function and patients generally showed an improvement. There were no reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Despite positive results from animal models, there is currently a lack of evidence in humans to conclude that stem cells can form durable neotissue similar to original human meniscus. There is a need for standardisation of protocol before further trials are considered. Initial outcomes from human studies are promising and mesenchymal stem cells may play an important role in meniscal repair in years to come.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5644998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56449982017-10-23 Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review Chew, Ernest Prakash, Rohan Khan, Wasim Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review Article BACKGROUND: Stem cell regeneration is the holy grail of meniscal tissue repair. Currently, the best treatment is to preserve the original meniscus but if it fails, a partial meniscectomy is indicated to delay the onset of osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors present a systematic review to determine the up-to-date evidence underlying the use of mesenchymal stem cells for meniscal regeneration in humans. A search was conducted using the electronic databases of MEDLINE/Pubmed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Search keywords included human, meniscus, stem cells and regeneration. RESULTS: After screening 10 non-duplicate studies, 5 were identified based on title and abstract. 4 were included in the analysis. There were marked differences in the method of stem cell harvest techniques. 3 studies administered stem cells through percutaneous injection into the knee and 1 study used a collagen scaffold. MRI analysis, functional scores and safety were assessed and the longest follow-up period was 2 years. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was most commonly used to assess function and patients generally showed an improvement. There were no reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Despite positive results from animal models, there is currently a lack of evidence in humans to conclude that stem cells can form durable neotissue similar to original human meniscus. There is a need for standardisation of protocol before further trials are considered. Initial outcomes from human studies are promising and mesenchymal stem cells may play an important role in meniscal repair in years to come. Elsevier 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5644998/ /pubmed/29062478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.09.018 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Chew, Ernest
Prakash, Rohan
Khan, Wasim
Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title_full Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title_fullStr Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title_short Mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: A systematic review
title_sort mesenchymal stem cells in human meniscal regeneration: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5644998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29062478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.09.018
work_keys_str_mv AT chewernest mesenchymalstemcellsinhumanmeniscalregenerationasystematicreview
AT prakashrohan mesenchymalstemcellsinhumanmeniscalregenerationasystematicreview
AT khanwasim mesenchymalstemcellsinhumanmeniscalregenerationasystematicreview