Cargando…

Portable biosensor for monitoring cortisol in low-volume perspired human sweat

A non-faradaic label-free cortisol biosensor was demonstrated using MoS(2) nanosheets integrated into a nanoporous flexible electrode system. Low volume (1–5 μL) sensing was achieved through use of a novel sensor stack design comprised of vertically aligned metal electrodes confining semi-conductive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinnamon, David, Ghanta, Ramesh, Lin, Kai-Chun, Muthukumar, Sriram, Prasad, Shalini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13684-7
Descripción
Sumario:A non-faradaic label-free cortisol biosensor was demonstrated using MoS(2) nanosheets integrated into a nanoporous flexible electrode system. Low volume (1–5 μL) sensing was achieved through use of a novel sensor stack design comprised of vertically aligned metal electrodes confining semi-conductive MoS(2) nanosheets. The MoS(2) nanosheets were surface functionalized with cortisol antibodies towards developing an affinity biosensor specific to the physiological relevant range of cortisol (8.16 to 141.7 ng/mL) in perspired human sweat. Sensing was achieved by measuring impedance changes associated with cortisol binding along the MoS(2) nanosheet interface using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The sensor demonstrated a dynamic range from 1–500 ng/mL with a limit of detection of 1 ng/mL. A specificity study was conducted using a metabolite expressed in human sweat, Ethyl Glucuronide. Continuous dosing studies were performed during which the sensor was able to discriminate between four cortisol concentration ranges (0.5, 5, 50, 500 ng/mL) for a 3+ hour duration. Translatability of the sensor was shown with a portable form factor device, demonstrating a comparable dynamic range and limit of detection for the sensor. The device demonstrated a R(2) correlation value of 0.998 when comparing measurements to the reported impedance values of the benchtop instrumentation.