Cargando…
Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review
Nowadays, interactions with others do not only involve human peers but also automated systems. Many studies suggest that the motor predictive systems that are engaged during action execution are also involved during joint actions with peers and during other human generated action observation. Indeed...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052 |
_version_ | 1783271903576719360 |
---|---|
author | Sahaï, Aïsha Pacherie, Elisabeth Grynszpan, Ouriel Berberian, Bruno |
author_facet | Sahaï, Aïsha Pacherie, Elisabeth Grynszpan, Ouriel Berberian, Bruno |
author_sort | Sahaï, Aïsha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nowadays, interactions with others do not only involve human peers but also automated systems. Many studies suggest that the motor predictive systems that are engaged during action execution are also involved during joint actions with peers and during other human generated action observation. Indeed, the comparator model hypothesis suggests that the comparison between a predicted state and an estimated real state enables motor control, and by a similar functioning, understanding and anticipating observed actions. Such a mechanism allows making predictions about an ongoing action, and is essential to action regulation, especially during joint actions with peers. Interestingly, the same comparison process has been shown to be involved in the construction of an individual's sense of agency, both for self-generated and observed other human generated actions. However, the implication of such predictive mechanisms during interactions with machines is not consensual, probably due to the high heterogeneousness of the automata used in the experimentations, from very simplistic devices to full humanoid robots. The discrepancies that are observed during human/machine interactions could arise from the absence of action/observation matching abilities when interacting with traditional low-level automata. Consistently, the difficulties to build a joint agency with this kind of machines could stem from the same problem. In this context, we aim to review the studies investigating predictive mechanisms during social interactions with humans and with automated artificial systems. We will start by presenting human data that show the involvement of predictions in action control and in the sense of agency during social interactions. Thereafter, we will confront this literature with data from the robotic field. Finally, we will address the upcoming issues in the field of robotics related to automated systems aimed at acting as collaborative agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5645494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56454942017-10-27 Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review Sahaï, Aïsha Pacherie, Elisabeth Grynszpan, Ouriel Berberian, Bruno Front Neurorobot Neuroscience Nowadays, interactions with others do not only involve human peers but also automated systems. Many studies suggest that the motor predictive systems that are engaged during action execution are also involved during joint actions with peers and during other human generated action observation. Indeed, the comparator model hypothesis suggests that the comparison between a predicted state and an estimated real state enables motor control, and by a similar functioning, understanding and anticipating observed actions. Such a mechanism allows making predictions about an ongoing action, and is essential to action regulation, especially during joint actions with peers. Interestingly, the same comparison process has been shown to be involved in the construction of an individual's sense of agency, both for self-generated and observed other human generated actions. However, the implication of such predictive mechanisms during interactions with machines is not consensual, probably due to the high heterogeneousness of the automata used in the experimentations, from very simplistic devices to full humanoid robots. The discrepancies that are observed during human/machine interactions could arise from the absence of action/observation matching abilities when interacting with traditional low-level automata. Consistently, the difficulties to build a joint agency with this kind of machines could stem from the same problem. In this context, we aim to review the studies investigating predictive mechanisms during social interactions with humans and with automated artificial systems. We will start by presenting human data that show the involvement of predictions in action control and in the sense of agency during social interactions. Thereafter, we will confront this literature with data from the robotic field. Finally, we will address the upcoming issues in the field of robotics related to automated systems aimed at acting as collaborative agents. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5645494/ /pubmed/29081744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sahaï, Pacherie, Grynszpan and Berberian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Sahaï, Aïsha Pacherie, Elisabeth Grynszpan, Ouriel Berberian, Bruno Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title | Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title_full | Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title_fullStr | Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title_short | Predictive Mechanisms Are Not Involved the Same Way during Human-Human vs. Human-Machine Interactions: A Review |
title_sort | predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: a review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahaiaisha predictivemechanismsarenotinvolvedthesamewayduringhumanhumanvshumanmachineinteractionsareview AT pacherieelisabeth predictivemechanismsarenotinvolvedthesamewayduringhumanhumanvshumanmachineinteractionsareview AT grynszpanouriel predictivemechanismsarenotinvolvedthesamewayduringhumanhumanvshumanmachineinteractionsareview AT berberianbruno predictivemechanismsarenotinvolvedthesamewayduringhumanhumanvshumanmachineinteractionsareview |