Cargando…

Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach

Leishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania infantum, is a vector‐borne zoonotic disease that is endemic to the Mediterranean basin. The potential of rabbits and hares to serve as competent reservoirs for the disease has recently been demonstrated, although assessment of the importance of their role on dise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de la Cruz, María Luisa, Pérez, Andres, Domínguez, Mercedes, Moreno, Inmaculada, García, Nerea, Martínez, Irene, Navarro, Alejandro, Domínguez, Lucas, Álvarez, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29067196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.37
_version_ 1783271972203921408
author de la Cruz, María Luisa
Pérez, Andres
Domínguez, Mercedes
Moreno, Inmaculada
García, Nerea
Martínez, Irene
Navarro, Alejandro
Domínguez, Lucas
Álvarez, Julio
author_facet de la Cruz, María Luisa
Pérez, Andres
Domínguez, Mercedes
Moreno, Inmaculada
García, Nerea
Martínez, Irene
Navarro, Alejandro
Domínguez, Lucas
Álvarez, Julio
author_sort de la Cruz, María Luisa
collection PubMed
description Leishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania infantum, is a vector‐borne zoonotic disease that is endemic to the Mediterranean basin. The potential of rabbits and hares to serve as competent reservoirs for the disease has recently been demonstrated, although assessment of the importance of their role on disease dynamics is hampered by the absence of quantitative knowledge on the accuracy of diagnostic techniques in these species. A Bayesian latent‐class model was used here to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the Immuno‐fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in serum and a Leishmania‐nested PCR (Ln‐PCR) in skin for samples collected from 217 rabbits and 70 hares from two different populations in the region of Madrid, Spain. A two‐population model, assuming conditional independence between test results and incorporating prior information on the performance of the tests in other animal species obtained from the literature, was used. Two alternative cut‐off values were assumed for the interpretation of the IFAT results: 1/50 for conservative and 1/25 for sensitive interpretation. Results suggest that sensitivity and specificity of the IFAT were around 70–80%, whereas the Ln‐PCR was highly specific (96%) but had a limited sensitivity (28.9% applying the conservative interpretation and 21.3% with the sensitive one). Prevalence was higher in the rabbit population (50.5% and 72.6%, for the conservative and sensitive interpretation, respectively) than in hares (6.7% and 13.2%). Our results demonstrate that the IFAT may be a useful screening tool for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in rabbits and hares. These results will help to design and implement surveillance programmes in wild species, with the ultimate objective of early detecting and preventing incursions of the disease into domestic and human populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5645865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56458652017-10-24 Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach de la Cruz, María Luisa Pérez, Andres Domínguez, Mercedes Moreno, Inmaculada García, Nerea Martínez, Irene Navarro, Alejandro Domínguez, Lucas Álvarez, Julio Vet Med Sci Original Articles Leishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania infantum, is a vector‐borne zoonotic disease that is endemic to the Mediterranean basin. The potential of rabbits and hares to serve as competent reservoirs for the disease has recently been demonstrated, although assessment of the importance of their role on disease dynamics is hampered by the absence of quantitative knowledge on the accuracy of diagnostic techniques in these species. A Bayesian latent‐class model was used here to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the Immuno‐fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in serum and a Leishmania‐nested PCR (Ln‐PCR) in skin for samples collected from 217 rabbits and 70 hares from two different populations in the region of Madrid, Spain. A two‐population model, assuming conditional independence between test results and incorporating prior information on the performance of the tests in other animal species obtained from the literature, was used. Two alternative cut‐off values were assumed for the interpretation of the IFAT results: 1/50 for conservative and 1/25 for sensitive interpretation. Results suggest that sensitivity and specificity of the IFAT were around 70–80%, whereas the Ln‐PCR was highly specific (96%) but had a limited sensitivity (28.9% applying the conservative interpretation and 21.3% with the sensitive one). Prevalence was higher in the rabbit population (50.5% and 72.6%, for the conservative and sensitive interpretation, respectively) than in hares (6.7% and 13.2%). Our results demonstrate that the IFAT may be a useful screening tool for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in rabbits and hares. These results will help to design and implement surveillance programmes in wild species, with the ultimate objective of early detecting and preventing incursions of the disease into domestic and human populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5645865/ /pubmed/29067196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.37 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
de la Cruz, María Luisa
Pérez, Andres
Domínguez, Mercedes
Moreno, Inmaculada
García, Nerea
Martínez, Irene
Navarro, Alejandro
Domínguez, Lucas
Álvarez, Julio
Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title_full Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title_fullStr Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title_short Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (IFAT) and molecular (direct‐PCR) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a Bayesian approach
title_sort assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of serological (ifat) and molecular (direct‐pcr) techniques for diagnosis of leishmaniasis in lagomorphs using a bayesian approach
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29067196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.37
work_keys_str_mv AT delacruzmarialuisa assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT perezandres assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT dominguezmercedes assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT morenoinmaculada assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT garcianerea assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT martinezirene assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT navarroalejandro assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT dominguezlucas assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach
AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthesensitivityandspecificityofserologicalifatandmoleculardirectpcrtechniquesfordiagnosisofleishmaniasisinlagomorphsusingabayesianapproach