Cargando…

Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a significant public health issue that considerably deters the ongoing TB control efforts in India. The purpose of this review was to investigate the prevalence of DR-TB and understand the regional variation in resistance pattern across In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Vishal, Kadam, Vijay, Narang, Prashant, Singh, Vikram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4779-5
_version_ 1783271976439119872
author Goyal, Vishal
Kadam, Vijay
Narang, Prashant
Singh, Vikram
author_facet Goyal, Vishal
Kadam, Vijay
Narang, Prashant
Singh, Vikram
author_sort Goyal, Vishal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a significant public health issue that considerably deters the ongoing TB control efforts in India. The purpose of this review was to investigate the prevalence of DR-TB and understand the regional variation in resistance pattern across India from 1995 to 2015, based on a large body of published epidemiological studies. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies reporting prevalence of DR-TB from biomedical databases (PubMed and IndMed) was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model and the pooled prevalence estimate (95% confidence interval [CI]) of DR-TB, multidrug resistant (MDR-) TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) TB and XDR-TB were calculated across two study periods (decade 1: 1995 to 2005; decade 2: 2006 to 2015), countrywide and in different regions. Heterogeneity in this meta-analysis was assessed using I(2) statistic. RESULTS: A total of 75 of 635 screened studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. Over 40% of 45,076 isolates suspected for resistance to any first-line anti-TB drugs tested positive. Comparative analysis revealed a worsening trend in DR-TB between the two study decades (decade 1: 37.7% [95% CI = 29.0; 46.4], n = 25 vs decade 2: 46.1% [95% CI = 39.0; 53.2], n = 36). The pooled estimate of MDR-TB resistance was higher in previously treated patients (decade 1: 29.8% [95% CI = 20.7; 39.0], n = 13; decade 2: 35.8% [95% CI = 29.2; 42.4], n = 24) as compared with the newly diagnosed cases (decade 1: 4.1% [95% CI = 2.7; 5.6], n = 13; decade 2: 5.6% [95% CI = 3.8; 7.4], n = 17). Overall, studies from Western states of India reported highest prevalence of DR-TB (57.8% [95% CI = 37.4; 78.2], n = 6) and MDR-TB (39.9% [95% CI = 21.7; 58.0], n = 6) during decade 2. Prevalence of pre-XDR TB was 7.9% (95% CI = 4.4; 11.4, n = 5) with resistance to fluoroquinolone (66.3% [95% CI = 58.2; 74.4], n = 5) being the highest. The prevalence of XDR-TB was 1.9% (95% CI = 1.2; 2.6, n = 14) over the 20-year period. CONCLUSION: The alarming increase in the trend of anti-TB drug resistance in India warrants the need for a structured nationwide surveillance to assist the National TB Control Program in strengthening treatment strategies for improved outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5645895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56458952017-10-26 Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis Goyal, Vishal Kadam, Vijay Narang, Prashant Singh, Vikram BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a significant public health issue that considerably deters the ongoing TB control efforts in India. The purpose of this review was to investigate the prevalence of DR-TB and understand the regional variation in resistance pattern across India from 1995 to 2015, based on a large body of published epidemiological studies. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies reporting prevalence of DR-TB from biomedical databases (PubMed and IndMed) was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model and the pooled prevalence estimate (95% confidence interval [CI]) of DR-TB, multidrug resistant (MDR-) TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) TB and XDR-TB were calculated across two study periods (decade 1: 1995 to 2005; decade 2: 2006 to 2015), countrywide and in different regions. Heterogeneity in this meta-analysis was assessed using I(2) statistic. RESULTS: A total of 75 of 635 screened studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. Over 40% of 45,076 isolates suspected for resistance to any first-line anti-TB drugs tested positive. Comparative analysis revealed a worsening trend in DR-TB between the two study decades (decade 1: 37.7% [95% CI = 29.0; 46.4], n = 25 vs decade 2: 46.1% [95% CI = 39.0; 53.2], n = 36). The pooled estimate of MDR-TB resistance was higher in previously treated patients (decade 1: 29.8% [95% CI = 20.7; 39.0], n = 13; decade 2: 35.8% [95% CI = 29.2; 42.4], n = 24) as compared with the newly diagnosed cases (decade 1: 4.1% [95% CI = 2.7; 5.6], n = 13; decade 2: 5.6% [95% CI = 3.8; 7.4], n = 17). Overall, studies from Western states of India reported highest prevalence of DR-TB (57.8% [95% CI = 37.4; 78.2], n = 6) and MDR-TB (39.9% [95% CI = 21.7; 58.0], n = 6) during decade 2. Prevalence of pre-XDR TB was 7.9% (95% CI = 4.4; 11.4, n = 5) with resistance to fluoroquinolone (66.3% [95% CI = 58.2; 74.4], n = 5) being the highest. The prevalence of XDR-TB was 1.9% (95% CI = 1.2; 2.6, n = 14) over the 20-year period. CONCLUSION: The alarming increase in the trend of anti-TB drug resistance in India warrants the need for a structured nationwide surveillance to assist the National TB Control Program in strengthening treatment strategies for improved outcomes. BioMed Central 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5645895/ /pubmed/29041901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4779-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goyal, Vishal
Kadam, Vijay
Narang, Prashant
Singh, Vikram
Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in India: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in india: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4779-5
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalvishal prevalenceofdrugresistantpulmonarytuberculosisinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kadamvijay prevalenceofdrugresistantpulmonarytuberculosisinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT narangprashant prevalenceofdrugresistantpulmonarytuberculosisinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singhvikram prevalenceofdrugresistantpulmonarytuberculosisinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis