Cargando…
An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent
BACKGROUND: The development of understandable informed consent (IC) documents has proven to be one of the most important challenges in research with humans as well as in healthcare settings. Therefore, evaluating and improving understanding has been of increasing interest for empirical research on I...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2204-0 |
_version_ | 1783271980733038592 |
---|---|
author | Bossert, Sabine Strech, Daniel |
author_facet | Bossert, Sabine Strech, Daniel |
author_sort | Bossert, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of understandable informed consent (IC) documents has proven to be one of the most important challenges in research with humans as well as in healthcare settings. Therefore, evaluating and improving understanding has been of increasing interest for empirical research on IC. However, several conceptual and practical challenges for the development of understandable IC documents remain unresolved. METHODS: In this paper, we will outline and systematize some of these challenges. On the basis of our own experiences in empirical user testing of IC documents as well as the relevant literature on understanding in IC, we propose an integrated conceptual model for the development of understandable IC documents. RESULTS: The proposed conceptual model integrates different methods for the participatory improvement of written information, including IC, as well as quantitative methods for measuring understanding in IC. CONCLUSIONS: In most IC processes, understandable written information is an important prerequisite for valid IC. To improve the quality of IC documents, a conceptual model for participatory procedures of testing, revising, and retesting can be applied. However, the model presented in this paper needs further theoretical and empirical elaboration and clarification of several conceptual and practical challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5645914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56459142017-10-26 An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent Bossert, Sabine Strech, Daniel Trials Research BACKGROUND: The development of understandable informed consent (IC) documents has proven to be one of the most important challenges in research with humans as well as in healthcare settings. Therefore, evaluating and improving understanding has been of increasing interest for empirical research on IC. However, several conceptual and practical challenges for the development of understandable IC documents remain unresolved. METHODS: In this paper, we will outline and systematize some of these challenges. On the basis of our own experiences in empirical user testing of IC documents as well as the relevant literature on understanding in IC, we propose an integrated conceptual model for the development of understandable IC documents. RESULTS: The proposed conceptual model integrates different methods for the participatory improvement of written information, including IC, as well as quantitative methods for measuring understanding in IC. CONCLUSIONS: In most IC processes, understandable written information is an important prerequisite for valid IC. To improve the quality of IC documents, a conceptual model for participatory procedures of testing, revising, and retesting can be applied. However, the model presented in this paper needs further theoretical and empirical elaboration and clarification of several conceptual and practical challenges. BioMed Central 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5645914/ /pubmed/29041981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2204-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bossert, Sabine Strech, Daniel An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title | An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title_full | An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title_fullStr | An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title_full_unstemmed | An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title_short | An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
title_sort | integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2204-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bossertsabine anintegratedconceptualframeworkforevaluatingandimprovingunderstandingininformedconsent AT strechdaniel anintegratedconceptualframeworkforevaluatingandimprovingunderstandingininformedconsent AT bossertsabine integratedconceptualframeworkforevaluatingandimprovingunderstandingininformedconsent AT strechdaniel integratedconceptualframeworkforevaluatingandimprovingunderstandingininformedconsent |