Cargando…
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 |
_version_ | 1783272036320149504 |
---|---|
author | Whiting, Penny Wolff, Robert Mallett, Susan Simera, Iveta Savović, Jelena |
author_facet | Whiting, Penny Wolff, Robert Mallett, Susan Simera, Iveta Savović, Jelena |
author_sort | Whiting, Penny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS: This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines. RESULTS: We do not recommend a single ‘best’ approach. Instead, we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around three key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5646161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56461612017-10-26 A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools Whiting, Penny Wolff, Robert Mallett, Susan Simera, Iveta Savović, Jelena Syst Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS: This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines. RESULTS: We do not recommend a single ‘best’ approach. Instead, we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around three key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods. BioMed Central 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5646161/ /pubmed/29041953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Whiting, Penny Wolff, Robert Mallett, Susan Simera, Iveta Savović, Jelena A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title | A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title_full | A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title_fullStr | A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title_full_unstemmed | A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title_short | A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
title_sort | proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitingpenny aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT wolffrobert aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT mallettsusan aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT simeraiveta aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT savovicjelena aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT whitingpenny proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT wolffrobert proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT mallettsusan proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT simeraiveta proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools AT savovicjelena proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools |