Cargando…

A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whiting, Penny, Wolff, Robert, Mallett, Susan, Simera, Iveta, Savović, Jelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6
_version_ 1783272036320149504
author Whiting, Penny
Wolff, Robert
Mallett, Susan
Simera, Iveta
Savović, Jelena
author_facet Whiting, Penny
Wolff, Robert
Mallett, Susan
Simera, Iveta
Savović, Jelena
author_sort Whiting, Penny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS: This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines. RESULTS: We do not recommend a single ‘best’ approach. Instead, we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around three key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5646161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56461612017-10-26 A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools Whiting, Penny Wolff, Robert Mallett, Susan Simera, Iveta Savović, Jelena Syst Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool. METHODS: This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines. RESULTS: We do not recommend a single ‘best’ approach. Instead, we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around three key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods. BioMed Central 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5646161/ /pubmed/29041953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Whiting, Penny
Wolff, Robert
Mallett, Susan
Simera, Iveta
Savović, Jelena
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title_full A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title_fullStr A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title_full_unstemmed A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title_short A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
title_sort proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6
work_keys_str_mv AT whitingpenny aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT wolffrobert aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT mallettsusan aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT simeraiveta aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT savovicjelena aproposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT whitingpenny proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT wolffrobert proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT mallettsusan proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT simeraiveta proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools
AT savovicjelena proposedframeworkfordevelopingqualityassessmenttools