Cargando…

Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There have, yet, been only few attempts to phonetically characterize the vocalizations of pain, although there is wide agreement that moaning, groaning, or other nonverbal utterance can be indicative of pain. We studied the production of vowels “u,” “a,” “i”, and “schwa”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lautenbacher, Stefan, Salinas-Ranneberg, Melissa, Niebuhr, Oliver, Kunz, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000597
_version_ 1783272110306623488
author Lautenbacher, Stefan
Salinas-Ranneberg, Melissa
Niebuhr, Oliver
Kunz, Miriam
author_facet Lautenbacher, Stefan
Salinas-Ranneberg, Melissa
Niebuhr, Oliver
Kunz, Miriam
author_sort Lautenbacher, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There have, yet, been only few attempts to phonetically characterize the vocalizations of pain, although there is wide agreement that moaning, groaning, or other nonverbal utterance can be indicative of pain. We studied the production of vowels “u,” “a,” “i”, and “schwa” (central vowel, sounding like a darker “e” as in hesitations like “ehm”)—as experimental approximations to natural vocalizations. METHODS: In 50 students vowel production and self-report ratings were assessed during painful and nonpainful heat stimulation (hot water immersion) as well as during baseline (no-stimulation). The phonetic parameters extracted were pitch (mean F(0)), phonatory fluctuations (range F(0)) and loudness (acoustic energy level). RESULTS: Only for the vowels “u” and “schwa,” which might be considered best approximations to moaning and groaning, did pitch and loudness increase during pain. Furthermore, changes from nonpainful to painful stimulations in these parameters also significantly predicted concurrent changes in pain ratings. CONCLUSION: Vocalization characteristics of pain seem to be best described by an increase in pitch and in loudness. Future studies using more specific and comprehensive phonetic analyses will surely help to provide an even more precise characterization of vocalizations because of pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5646576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56465762017-10-24 Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain Lautenbacher, Stefan Salinas-Ranneberg, Melissa Niebuhr, Oliver Kunz, Miriam Pain Rep General Section INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There have, yet, been only few attempts to phonetically characterize the vocalizations of pain, although there is wide agreement that moaning, groaning, or other nonverbal utterance can be indicative of pain. We studied the production of vowels “u,” “a,” “i”, and “schwa” (central vowel, sounding like a darker “e” as in hesitations like “ehm”)—as experimental approximations to natural vocalizations. METHODS: In 50 students vowel production and self-report ratings were assessed during painful and nonpainful heat stimulation (hot water immersion) as well as during baseline (no-stimulation). The phonetic parameters extracted were pitch (mean F(0)), phonatory fluctuations (range F(0)) and loudness (acoustic energy level). RESULTS: Only for the vowels “u” and “schwa,” which might be considered best approximations to moaning and groaning, did pitch and loudness increase during pain. Furthermore, changes from nonpainful to painful stimulations in these parameters also significantly predicted concurrent changes in pain ratings. CONCLUSION: Vocalization characteristics of pain seem to be best described by an increase in pitch and in loudness. Future studies using more specific and comprehensive phonetic analyses will surely help to provide an even more precise characterization of vocalizations because of pain. Wolters Kluwer 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5646576/ /pubmed/29075677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000597 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle General Section
Lautenbacher, Stefan
Salinas-Ranneberg, Melissa
Niebuhr, Oliver
Kunz, Miriam
Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title_full Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title_fullStr Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title_full_unstemmed Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title_short Phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
title_sort phonetic characteristics of vocalizations during pain
topic General Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000597
work_keys_str_mv AT lautenbacherstefan phoneticcharacteristicsofvocalizationsduringpain
AT salinasrannebergmelissa phoneticcharacteristicsofvocalizationsduringpain
AT niebuhroliver phoneticcharacteristicsofvocalizationsduringpain
AT kunzmiriam phoneticcharacteristicsofvocalizationsduringpain