Cargando…

Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials

Several properties of bio-inspired surfaces like chemical composition, surface topography, surface hydrophilicity and even surface charge could influence bacterial adhesion to implant materials. Therefore, a nanostructured surface is being investigated to avoid bacterial colonization by their physic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika, Mukaddam, Khaled, Hauser-Gerspach, Irmgard, Köser, Joachim, Glatzel, Thilo, Kisiel, Marcin, Marot, Laurent, Kühl, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1325241
_version_ 1783272121241174016
author Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika
Mukaddam, Khaled
Hauser-Gerspach, Irmgard
Köser, Joachim
Glatzel, Thilo
Kisiel, Marcin
Marot, Laurent
Kühl, Sebastian
author_facet Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika
Mukaddam, Khaled
Hauser-Gerspach, Irmgard
Köser, Joachim
Glatzel, Thilo
Kisiel, Marcin
Marot, Laurent
Kühl, Sebastian
author_sort Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika
collection PubMed
description Several properties of bio-inspired surfaces like chemical composition, surface topography, surface hydrophilicity and even surface charge could influence bacterial adhesion to implant materials. Therefore, a nanostructured surface is being investigated to avoid bacterial colonization by their physico-mechanical and chemical aspects. Both smooth and rough-surfaced titanium (PT, SLA) and zirconia (M and ZLA) surfaces were used as controls. Titanium SLA was modified by two-step-etching to create nanostructured surface. Antibacterial properties of the materials were tested by adhesion of Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277). The vitality of bacteria was assessed by Live/Dead BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit or by conventional culturing on Columbia blood agar. Conventional culturing revealed reduction of bacteria on nanostructured titanium (5.27±0.8 x 10(4) CFU/mm(2)) in comparison to rough-surfaced control materials (ZLA 6.16±4.86 x 10(4) and SLA 1.53±0.75 x 10(5) CFU/mm(2)). However, smooth-surfaced control materials (M 2.25±0.84 x 10(4) and PT 6.63±5.77 x 10(3) CFU/mm(2)) showed similar results to the nanostructured material. Live/dead staining demonstrated the antimicrobial efficacy of the nanostructured material revealing reduction of vital bacteria population up to 70%. This effect was not observed on the control materials (bacterial vitality ≥95%). In conclusion, nanostructured titanium surface shows a reduction of vital bacteria. Therefore, bio-inspired nanostructures can modify the bacteria–titanium interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5646622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56466222017-10-27 Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika Mukaddam, Khaled Hauser-Gerspach, Irmgard Köser, Joachim Glatzel, Thilo Kisiel, Marcin Marot, Laurent Kühl, Sebastian J Oral Microbiol Session-4: Antimicrobial approaches Several properties of bio-inspired surfaces like chemical composition, surface topography, surface hydrophilicity and even surface charge could influence bacterial adhesion to implant materials. Therefore, a nanostructured surface is being investigated to avoid bacterial colonization by their physico-mechanical and chemical aspects. Both smooth and rough-surfaced titanium (PT, SLA) and zirconia (M and ZLA) surfaces were used as controls. Titanium SLA was modified by two-step-etching to create nanostructured surface. Antibacterial properties of the materials were tested by adhesion of Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277). The vitality of bacteria was assessed by Live/Dead BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit or by conventional culturing on Columbia blood agar. Conventional culturing revealed reduction of bacteria on nanostructured titanium (5.27±0.8 x 10(4) CFU/mm(2)) in comparison to rough-surfaced control materials (ZLA 6.16±4.86 x 10(4) and SLA 1.53±0.75 x 10(5) CFU/mm(2)). However, smooth-surfaced control materials (M 2.25±0.84 x 10(4) and PT 6.63±5.77 x 10(3) CFU/mm(2)) showed similar results to the nanostructured material. Live/dead staining demonstrated the antimicrobial efficacy of the nanostructured material revealing reduction of vital bacteria population up to 70%. This effect was not observed on the control materials (bacterial vitality ≥95%). In conclusion, nanostructured titanium surface shows a reduction of vital bacteria. Therefore, bio-inspired nanostructures can modify the bacteria–titanium interaction. Taylor & Francis 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5646622/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1325241 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Session-4: Antimicrobial approaches
Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Monika
Mukaddam, Khaled
Hauser-Gerspach, Irmgard
Köser, Joachim
Glatzel, Thilo
Kisiel, Marcin
Marot, Laurent
Kühl, Sebastian
Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title_full Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title_fullStr Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title_short Antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
title_sort antibacterial effects of bio-inspired nanostructured materials
topic Session-4: Antimicrobial approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5646622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1325241
work_keys_str_mv AT astasovfrauenhoffermonika antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT mukaddamkhaled antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT hausergerspachirmgard antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT koserjoachim antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT glatzelthilo antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT kisielmarcin antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT marotlaurent antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials
AT kuhlsebastian antibacterialeffectsofbioinspirednanostructuredmaterials