Cargando…

Honour and subsistence: invention, credit and surgery in the nineteenth century

The origins of contemporary exclusion of surgical methods from patenting lie in the complexities of managing credit claims in operative surgery, recognized in the nineteenth century. While surgical methods were not deemed patentable, surgeons were nevertheless embedded within patent culture. In an a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: FRAMPTON, SALLY
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27884216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087416001126
Descripción
Sumario:The origins of contemporary exclusion of surgical methods from patenting lie in the complexities of managing credit claims in operative surgery, recognized in the nineteenth century. While surgical methods were not deemed patentable, surgeons were nevertheless embedded within patent culture. In an atmosphere of heightened awareness about the importance of ‘inventors’, how surgeons should be recognized and rewarded for their inventions was an important question. I examine an episode during the 1840s which seemed to concretize the inapplicability of patents to surgical practice, before looking at alternatives to patenting, used by surgeons to gain social and financial credit for inventions.