Cargando…

Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sporns, Peter B., Schwake, Michael, Kemmling, André, Minnerup, Jens, Schwindt, Wolfram, Niederstadt, Thomas, Schmidt, Rene, Hanning, Uta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Stroke Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2016.02061
_version_ 1783272278370287616
author Sporns, Peter B.
Schwake, Michael
Kemmling, André
Minnerup, Jens
Schwindt, Wolfram
Niederstadt, Thomas
Schmidt, Rene
Hanning, Uta
author_facet Sporns, Peter B.
Schwake, Michael
Kemmling, André
Minnerup, Jens
Schwindt, Wolfram
Niederstadt, Thomas
Schmidt, Rene
Hanning, Uta
author_sort Sporns, Peter B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have not been well explored. METHODS: In this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were: 1) spontaneous ICH and 2) NCCT and CTA performed on admission within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. Discharge outcome was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and poor (mRS 4-6) outcomes. The impacts of BHS, BS and SS on outcome were assessed in univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 182 patients with spontaneous ICH, 26 (14.3%) presented with BHS, 37 (20.3%) with BS and 39 (21.4%) with SS. There was a substantial correlation between SS and BS (κ=0.701) and a moderate correlation between SS and BHS (κ=0.424). In univariable logistic regression, higher baseline hematoma volume (P<0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.002) and the presence of BHS/BS/SS (all P<0.001) on admission CT scan were associated with poor outcome. Multivariable analysis identified intraventricular haemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 2.22 per mL, P=0.022), baseline hematoma volume (OR 1.03 per mL, P<0.001) and SS on CTA (OR 11.43, P<0.001) as independent predictors of poor outcome, showing that SS compared to BS and BHS was more powerful to predict poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The NCCT BHS and BS are correlated with the CTA SS and are reliable predictors of poor outcome in patients with ICH. Of the CT variables indicating early hematoma expansion, SS on CTA was the most reliable outcome predictor. However, given their correlation with SS on CTA, BS and BHS on NCCT can be useful for predicting outcome if CTA is not obtainable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5647634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Stroke Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56476342017-10-23 Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Sporns, Peter B. Schwake, Michael Kemmling, André Minnerup, Jens Schwindt, Wolfram Niederstadt, Thomas Schmidt, Rene Hanning, Uta J Stroke Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have not been well explored. METHODS: In this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were: 1) spontaneous ICH and 2) NCCT and CTA performed on admission within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. Discharge outcome was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and poor (mRS 4-6) outcomes. The impacts of BHS, BS and SS on outcome were assessed in univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 182 patients with spontaneous ICH, 26 (14.3%) presented with BHS, 37 (20.3%) with BS and 39 (21.4%) with SS. There was a substantial correlation between SS and BS (κ=0.701) and a moderate correlation between SS and BHS (κ=0.424). In univariable logistic regression, higher baseline hematoma volume (P<0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.002) and the presence of BHS/BS/SS (all P<0.001) on admission CT scan were associated with poor outcome. Multivariable analysis identified intraventricular haemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 2.22 per mL, P=0.022), baseline hematoma volume (OR 1.03 per mL, P<0.001) and SS on CTA (OR 11.43, P<0.001) as independent predictors of poor outcome, showing that SS compared to BS and BHS was more powerful to predict poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The NCCT BHS and BS are correlated with the CTA SS and are reliable predictors of poor outcome in patients with ICH. Of the CT variables indicating early hematoma expansion, SS on CTA was the most reliable outcome predictor. However, given their correlation with SS on CTA, BS and BHS on NCCT can be useful for predicting outcome if CTA is not obtainable. Korean Stroke Society 2017-09 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5647634/ /pubmed/29037015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2016.02061 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Stroke Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sporns, Peter B.
Schwake, Michael
Kemmling, André
Minnerup, Jens
Schwindt, Wolfram
Niederstadt, Thomas
Schmidt, Rene
Hanning, Uta
Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_full Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_fullStr Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_short Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_sort comparison of spot sign, blend sign and black hole sign for outcome prediction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5853/jos.2016.02061
work_keys_str_mv AT spornspeterb comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT schwakemichael comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT kemmlingandre comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT minnerupjens comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT schwindtwolfram comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT niederstadtthomas comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT schmidtrene comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT hanninguta comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage