Cargando…

A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease

Few studies have focussed on the health and immunity of triploid Atlantic salmon and therefore much is still unknown about their response to commercially significant pathogens. This is important if triploid stocks are to be considered for full-scale commercial production. This study aimed to investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CHALMERS, LYNN, TAYLOR, JOHN F., ROY, WILLIAM, PRESTON, ANDREW C., MIGAUD, HERVE, ADAMS, ALEXANDRA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28492111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000622
_version_ 1783272283259797504
author CHALMERS, LYNN
TAYLOR, JOHN F.
ROY, WILLIAM
PRESTON, ANDREW C.
MIGAUD, HERVE
ADAMS, ALEXANDRA
author_facet CHALMERS, LYNN
TAYLOR, JOHN F.
ROY, WILLIAM
PRESTON, ANDREW C.
MIGAUD, HERVE
ADAMS, ALEXANDRA
author_sort CHALMERS, LYNN
collection PubMed
description Few studies have focussed on the health and immunity of triploid Atlantic salmon and therefore much is still unknown about their response to commercially significant pathogens. This is important if triploid stocks are to be considered for full-scale commercial production. This study aimed to investigate and compare the response of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon to an experimental challenge with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD). This disease is economically significant for the aquaculture industry. The results indicated that ploidy had no significant effect on gross gill score or gill filaments affected, while infection and time had significant effects. Ploidy, infection and time did not affect complement or anti-protease activities. Ploidy had a significant effect on lysozyme activity at 21 days post-infection (while infection and time did not), although activity was within the ranges previously recorded for salmonids. Stock did not significantly affect any of the parameters measured. Based on the study results, it can be suggested that ploidy does not affect the manifestation or severity of AGD pathology or the serum innate immune response. Additionally, the serum immune response of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon may not be significantly affected by amoebic gill disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5647666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56476662017-10-27 A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease CHALMERS, LYNN TAYLOR, JOHN F. ROY, WILLIAM PRESTON, ANDREW C. MIGAUD, HERVE ADAMS, ALEXANDRA Parasitology Research Article Few studies have focussed on the health and immunity of triploid Atlantic salmon and therefore much is still unknown about their response to commercially significant pathogens. This is important if triploid stocks are to be considered for full-scale commercial production. This study aimed to investigate and compare the response of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon to an experimental challenge with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease (AGD). This disease is economically significant for the aquaculture industry. The results indicated that ploidy had no significant effect on gross gill score or gill filaments affected, while infection and time had significant effects. Ploidy, infection and time did not affect complement or anti-protease activities. Ploidy had a significant effect on lysozyme activity at 21 days post-infection (while infection and time did not), although activity was within the ranges previously recorded for salmonids. Stock did not significantly affect any of the parameters measured. Based on the study results, it can be suggested that ploidy does not affect the manifestation or severity of AGD pathology or the serum innate immune response. Additionally, the serum immune response of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon may not be significantly affected by amoebic gill disease. Cambridge University Press 2017-08 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5647666/ /pubmed/28492111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000622 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
CHALMERS, LYNN
TAYLOR, JOHN F.
ROY, WILLIAM
PRESTON, ANDREW C.
MIGAUD, HERVE
ADAMS, ALEXANDRA
A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title_full A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title_fullStr A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title_short A comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with Neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
title_sort comparison of disease susceptibility and innate immune response between diploid and triploid atlantic salmon (salmo salar) siblings following experimental infection with neoparamoeba perurans, causative agent of amoebic gill disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28492111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000622
work_keys_str_mv AT chalmerslynn acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT taylorjohnf acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT roywilliam acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT prestonandrewc acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT migaudherve acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT adamsalexandra acomparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT chalmerslynn comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT taylorjohnf comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT roywilliam comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT prestonandrewc comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT migaudherve comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease
AT adamsalexandra comparisonofdiseasesusceptibilityandinnateimmuneresponsebetweendiploidandtriploidatlanticsalmonsalmosalarsiblingsfollowingexperimentalinfectionwithneoparamoebaperuranscausativeagentofamoebicgilldisease