Cargando…
ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters
Here, we conducted the first study to explore how motivations expressed through speech are processed in real-time. Participants listened to sentences spoken in two types of well-studied motivational tones (autonomy-supportive and controlling), or a neutral tone of voice. To examine this, listeners w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx064 |
_version_ | 1783272303496265728 |
---|---|
author | Zougkou, Konstantina Weinstein, Netta Paulmann, Silke |
author_facet | Zougkou, Konstantina Weinstein, Netta Paulmann, Silke |
author_sort | Zougkou, Konstantina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we conducted the first study to explore how motivations expressed through speech are processed in real-time. Participants listened to sentences spoken in two types of well-studied motivational tones (autonomy-supportive and controlling), or a neutral tone of voice. To examine this, listeners were presented with sentences that either signaled motivations through prosody (tone of voice) and words simultaneously (e.g. ‘You absolutely have to do it my way’ spoken in a controlling tone of voice), or lacked motivationally biasing words (e.g. ‘Why don’t we meet again tomorrow’ spoken in a motivational tone of voice). Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in response to motivations conveyed through words and prosody showed that listeners rapidly distinguished between motivations and neutral forms of communication as shown in enhanced P2 amplitudes in response to motivational when compared with neutral speech. This early detection mechanism is argued to help determine the importance of incoming information. Once assessed, motivational language is continuously monitored and thoroughly evaluated. When compared with neutral speech, listening to controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) speech led to enhanced late potential ERP mean amplitudes, suggesting that listeners are particularly attuned to controlling messages. The importance of controlling motivation for listeners is mirrored in effects observed for motivations expressed through prosody only. Here, an early rapid appraisal, as reflected in enhanced P2 amplitudes, is only found for sentences spoken in controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) prosody. Once identified as sounding pressuring, the message seems to be preferentially processed, as shown by enhanced late potential amplitudes in response to controlling prosody. Taken together, results suggest that motivational and neutral language are differentially processed; further, the data suggest that listening to cues signaling pressure and control cannot be ignored and lead to preferential, and more in-depth processing mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5647802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56478022017-10-25 ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters Zougkou, Konstantina Weinstein, Netta Paulmann, Silke Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Here, we conducted the first study to explore how motivations expressed through speech are processed in real-time. Participants listened to sentences spoken in two types of well-studied motivational tones (autonomy-supportive and controlling), or a neutral tone of voice. To examine this, listeners were presented with sentences that either signaled motivations through prosody (tone of voice) and words simultaneously (e.g. ‘You absolutely have to do it my way’ spoken in a controlling tone of voice), or lacked motivationally biasing words (e.g. ‘Why don’t we meet again tomorrow’ spoken in a motivational tone of voice). Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in response to motivations conveyed through words and prosody showed that listeners rapidly distinguished between motivations and neutral forms of communication as shown in enhanced P2 amplitudes in response to motivational when compared with neutral speech. This early detection mechanism is argued to help determine the importance of incoming information. Once assessed, motivational language is continuously monitored and thoroughly evaluated. When compared with neutral speech, listening to controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) speech led to enhanced late potential ERP mean amplitudes, suggesting that listeners are particularly attuned to controlling messages. The importance of controlling motivation for listeners is mirrored in effects observed for motivations expressed through prosody only. Here, an early rapid appraisal, as reflected in enhanced P2 amplitudes, is only found for sentences spoken in controlling (but not autonomy-supportive) prosody. Once identified as sounding pressuring, the message seems to be preferentially processed, as shown by enhanced late potential amplitudes in response to controlling prosody. Taken together, results suggest that motivational and neutral language are differentially processed; further, the data suggest that listening to cues signaling pressure and control cannot be ignored and lead to preferential, and more in-depth processing mechanisms. Oxford University Press 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5647802/ /pubmed/28525641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx064 Text en © The Author(s) (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zougkou, Konstantina Weinstein, Netta Paulmann, Silke ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title | ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title_full | ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title_fullStr | ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title_full_unstemmed | ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title_short | ERP correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
title_sort | erp correlates of motivating voices: quality of motivation and time-course matters |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5647802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zougkoukonstantina erpcorrelatesofmotivatingvoicesqualityofmotivationandtimecoursematters AT weinsteinnetta erpcorrelatesofmotivatingvoicesqualityofmotivationandtimecoursematters AT paulmannsilke erpcorrelatesofmotivatingvoicesqualityofmotivationandtimecoursematters |