Cargando…

XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: DNA repair mechanisms are crucial for sustaining DNA integrity and preventing carcinogenesis. The xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), X-ray repair cross complementing group 2 (XRCC2) and RAD51 are candidate genes for DNA repair pathways. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskandari, Ebrahim, Rezaifar, Alireza, Hashemi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28749109
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1805
_version_ 1783272381712695296
author Eskandari, Ebrahim
Rezaifar, Alireza
Hashemi, Mohammad
author_facet Eskandari, Ebrahim
Rezaifar, Alireza
Hashemi, Mohammad
author_sort Eskandari, Ebrahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA repair mechanisms are crucial for sustaining DNA integrity and preventing carcinogenesis. The xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), X-ray repair cross complementing group 2 (XRCC2) and RAD51 are candidate genes for DNA repair pathways. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studies that assessed the impact of XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C polymorphisms on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. This study included 10288 CRC patients and 11885 controls, and odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate the strength of association. RESULTS: The results of overall meta-analysis suggested an association between the XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and CRC susceptibility in allele (OR=1.06; 95% CI=1.01-1.12) and heterozygote model (OR=1.16; 95%CI=1.02-1.31). In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity and source of control, we found significantly increased CRC cancer risk in Asians (OR=1.12, 95%CI=1.04-1.21) and in hospital-based (OR=1.22, 95%CI=1.08-1.38) populations. Moreover, the RAD51 135 G/C polymorphism increased the risk of CRC in total using allele (OR=1.21) and recessive models (OR=1.62). However, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G was not associated with the risk of CRC in total or in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of our meta-analysis, the XPG Asp1104His and RAD51 135 G/C polymorphisms might influence colorectal cancer risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5648383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56483832017-10-31 XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Eskandari, Ebrahim Rezaifar, Alireza Hashemi, Mohammad Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: DNA repair mechanisms are crucial for sustaining DNA integrity and preventing carcinogenesis. The xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), X-ray repair cross complementing group 2 (XRCC2) and RAD51 are candidate genes for DNA repair pathways. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studies that assessed the impact of XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C polymorphisms on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. This study included 10288 CRC patients and 11885 controls, and odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate the strength of association. RESULTS: The results of overall meta-analysis suggested an association between the XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and CRC susceptibility in allele (OR=1.06; 95% CI=1.01-1.12) and heterozygote model (OR=1.16; 95%CI=1.02-1.31). In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity and source of control, we found significantly increased CRC cancer risk in Asians (OR=1.12, 95%CI=1.04-1.21) and in hospital-based (OR=1.22, 95%CI=1.08-1.38) populations. Moreover, the RAD51 135 G/C polymorphism increased the risk of CRC in total using allele (OR=1.21) and recessive models (OR=1.62). However, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G was not associated with the risk of CRC in total or in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of our meta-analysis, the XPG Asp1104His and RAD51 135 G/C polymorphisms might influence colorectal cancer risk. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5648383/ /pubmed/28749109 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1805 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Eskandari, Ebrahim
Rezaifar, Alireza
Hashemi, Mohammad
XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title_full XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title_short XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 Rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort xpg asp1104his, xrcc2 rs3218536 a/g and rad51 135g/c gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28749109
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1805
work_keys_str_mv AT eskandariebrahim xpgasp1104hisxrcc2rs3218536agandrad51135gcgenepolymorphismsandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysis
AT rezaifaralireza xpgasp1104hisxrcc2rs3218536agandrad51135gcgenepolymorphismsandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysis
AT hashemimohammad xpgasp1104hisxrcc2rs3218536agandrad51135gcgenepolymorphismsandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysis