Cargando…

Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption

BACKGROUND: Whilst several studies have examined inequity of tobacco use and inequity of alcohol drinking individually, comparatively little is known about concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption. The present study therefore investigated inequity of concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption in T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Intarut, Nirun, Pukdeesamai, Piyalak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28749620
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1913
_version_ 1783272385278902272
author Intarut, Nirun
Pukdeesamai, Piyalak
author_facet Intarut, Nirun
Pukdeesamai, Piyalak
author_sort Intarut, Nirun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whilst several studies have examined inequity of tobacco use and inequity of alcohol drinking individually, comparatively little is known about concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption. The present study therefore investigated inequity of concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption in Thailand. METHODS: The 2015 Health and Welfare Survey was obtained from Thailand’s National Statistical Office and used as a source of national representative data. Concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption was defined as current and concurrent use of both tobacco and alcohol. The wealth assets index was used as an indicator of socioeconomic inequity. Socioeconomic status included 5 groups ranging from poorest (Q1) to richest (Q5). A total of 55,920 households and 113,705 participants aged 15 years or over were included and analyzed. A weighted multiple logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption, tobacco consumption only, and alcohol consumption only were 15.2% (95% CI: 14.9, 15.4), 4.7% (95% CI: 4.5, 4.8), and 18.9% (95% CI: 18.7, 19.1), respectively. Weighted multiple logistic regression showed that concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption was high in the poorest socioeconomic group (P for trend <0.001), and tobacco consumption only was also high in the poorest group (P for trend <0.001). A high prevalence of alcohol consumption was observed in the richest group (P for trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that tobacco and alcohol consumption prevention programs would be more effective if they considered socioeconomic inequities in concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption rather than focusing on single drug use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5648398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56483982017-10-31 Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption Intarut, Nirun Pukdeesamai, Piyalak Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Whilst several studies have examined inequity of tobacco use and inequity of alcohol drinking individually, comparatively little is known about concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption. The present study therefore investigated inequity of concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption in Thailand. METHODS: The 2015 Health and Welfare Survey was obtained from Thailand’s National Statistical Office and used as a source of national representative data. Concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption was defined as current and concurrent use of both tobacco and alcohol. The wealth assets index was used as an indicator of socioeconomic inequity. Socioeconomic status included 5 groups ranging from poorest (Q1) to richest (Q5). A total of 55,920 households and 113,705 participants aged 15 years or over were included and analyzed. A weighted multiple logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption, tobacco consumption only, and alcohol consumption only were 15.2% (95% CI: 14.9, 15.4), 4.7% (95% CI: 4.5, 4.8), and 18.9% (95% CI: 18.7, 19.1), respectively. Weighted multiple logistic regression showed that concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption was high in the poorest socioeconomic group (P for trend <0.001), and tobacco consumption only was also high in the poorest group (P for trend <0.001). A high prevalence of alcohol consumption was observed in the richest group (P for trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that tobacco and alcohol consumption prevention programs would be more effective if they considered socioeconomic inequities in concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption rather than focusing on single drug use. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5648398/ /pubmed/28749620 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1913 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Intarut, Nirun
Pukdeesamai, Piyalak
Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title_full Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title_short Socioeconomic Inequality in Concurrent Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption
title_sort socioeconomic inequality in concurrent tobacco and alcohol consumption
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28749620
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1913
work_keys_str_mv AT intarutnirun socioeconomicinequalityinconcurrenttobaccoandalcoholconsumption
AT pukdeesamaipiyalak socioeconomicinequalityinconcurrenttobaccoandalcoholconsumption