Cargando…
Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not
Mutualistic interactions can strongly influence species invasions, as the inability to form successful mutualisms in an exotic range could hamper a host's invasion success. This barrier to invasion may be overcome if an invader either forms novel mutualistic associations or finds and associates...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3310 |
_version_ | 1783272420793122816 |
---|---|
author | La Pierre, Kimberly J. Simms, Ellen L. Tariq, Mohsin Zafar, Marriam Porter, Stephanie S. |
author_facet | La Pierre, Kimberly J. Simms, Ellen L. Tariq, Mohsin Zafar, Marriam Porter, Stephanie S. |
author_sort | La Pierre, Kimberly J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mutualistic interactions can strongly influence species invasions, as the inability to form successful mutualisms in an exotic range could hamper a host's invasion success. This barrier to invasion may be overcome if an invader either forms novel mutualistic associations or finds and associates with familiar mutualists in the exotic range. Here, we ask (1) does the community of rhizobial mutualists associated with invasive legumes in their exotic range overlap with that of local native legumes and (2) can any differences be explained by fundamental incompatibilities with particular rhizobial genotypes? To address these questions, we first characterized the rhizobial communities naturally associating with three invasive and six native legumes growing in the San Francisco Bay Area. We then conducted a greenhouse experiment to test whether the invasive legume could nodulate with any of a broad array of rhizobia found in their exotic range. There was little overlap between the Bradyrhizobium communities associated with wild‐grown invasive and native legumes, yet the invasive legumes could nodulate with a broad range of rhizobial strains under greenhouse conditions. These observations suggest that under field conditions in their exotic range, these invasive legumes are not currently associating with the mutualists of local native legumes, despite their potential to form such associations. However, the promiscuity with which these invading legumes can form mutualistic associations could be an important factor early in the invasion process if mutualist scarcity limits range expansion. Overall, the observation that invasive legumes have a community of rhizobia distinct from that of native legumes, despite their ability to associate with many rhizobial strains, challenges existing assumptions about how invading species obtain their mutualists. These results can therefore inform current and future efforts to prevent and remove invasive species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5648655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56486552017-10-26 Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not La Pierre, Kimberly J. Simms, Ellen L. Tariq, Mohsin Zafar, Marriam Porter, Stephanie S. Ecol Evol Original Research Mutualistic interactions can strongly influence species invasions, as the inability to form successful mutualisms in an exotic range could hamper a host's invasion success. This barrier to invasion may be overcome if an invader either forms novel mutualistic associations or finds and associates with familiar mutualists in the exotic range. Here, we ask (1) does the community of rhizobial mutualists associated with invasive legumes in their exotic range overlap with that of local native legumes and (2) can any differences be explained by fundamental incompatibilities with particular rhizobial genotypes? To address these questions, we first characterized the rhizobial communities naturally associating with three invasive and six native legumes growing in the San Francisco Bay Area. We then conducted a greenhouse experiment to test whether the invasive legume could nodulate with any of a broad array of rhizobia found in their exotic range. There was little overlap between the Bradyrhizobium communities associated with wild‐grown invasive and native legumes, yet the invasive legumes could nodulate with a broad range of rhizobial strains under greenhouse conditions. These observations suggest that under field conditions in their exotic range, these invasive legumes are not currently associating with the mutualists of local native legumes, despite their potential to form such associations. However, the promiscuity with which these invading legumes can form mutualistic associations could be an important factor early in the invasion process if mutualist scarcity limits range expansion. Overall, the observation that invasive legumes have a community of rhizobia distinct from that of native legumes, despite their ability to associate with many rhizobial strains, challenges existing assumptions about how invading species obtain their mutualists. These results can therefore inform current and future efforts to prevent and remove invasive species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5648655/ /pubmed/29075475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3310 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research La Pierre, Kimberly J. Simms, Ellen L. Tariq, Mohsin Zafar, Marriam Porter, Stephanie S. Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title | Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title_full | Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title_fullStr | Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title_full_unstemmed | Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title_short | Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
title_sort | invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5648655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lapierrekimberlyj invasivelegumescanassociatewithmanymutualistsofnativelegumesbutusuallydonot AT simmsellenl invasivelegumescanassociatewithmanymutualistsofnativelegumesbutusuallydonot AT tariqmohsin invasivelegumescanassociatewithmanymutualistsofnativelegumesbutusuallydonot AT zafarmarriam invasivelegumescanassociatewithmanymutualistsofnativelegumesbutusuallydonot AT porterstephanies invasivelegumescanassociatewithmanymutualistsofnativelegumesbutusuallydonot |