Cargando…
Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1 |
_version_ | 1783272498538741760 |
---|---|
author | Jox, Ralf J. Black, Isra Borasio, Gian Domenico Anneser, Johanna |
author_facet | Jox, Ralf J. Black, Isra Borasio, Gian Domenico Anneser, Johanna |
author_sort | Jox, Ralf J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified. ARGUMENT: In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient’s choice of VSED depends on the physician’s assurance to provide medical support. CONCLUSION: Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals. Please see related article: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0951-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5649087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56490872017-10-26 Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? Jox, Ralf J. Black, Isra Borasio, Gian Domenico Anneser, Johanna BMC Med Debate BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified. ARGUMENT: In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient’s choice of VSED depends on the physician’s assurance to provide medical support. CONCLUSION: Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals. Please see related article: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0951-0. BioMed Central 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5649087/ /pubmed/29052518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate Jox, Ralf J. Black, Isra Borasio, Gian Domenico Anneser, Johanna Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title | Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title_full | Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title_fullStr | Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title_full_unstemmed | Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title_short | Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
title_sort | voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joxralfj voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified AT blackisra voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified AT borasiogiandomenico voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified AT anneserjohanna voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified |