Cargando…

Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?

BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jox, Ralf J., Black, Isra, Borasio, Gian Domenico, Anneser, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1
_version_ 1783272498538741760
author Jox, Ralf J.
Black, Isra
Borasio, Gian Domenico
Anneser, Johanna
author_facet Jox, Ralf J.
Black, Isra
Borasio, Gian Domenico
Anneser, Johanna
author_sort Jox, Ralf J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified. ARGUMENT: In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient’s choice of VSED depends on the physician’s assurance to provide medical support. CONCLUSION: Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals. Please see related article: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0951-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56490872017-10-26 Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified? Jox, Ralf J. Black, Isra Borasio, Gian Domenico Anneser, Johanna BMC Med Debate BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified. ARGUMENT: In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient’s choice of VSED depends on the physician’s assurance to provide medical support. CONCLUSION: Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals. Please see related article: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0951-0. BioMed Central 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5649087/ /pubmed/29052518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Jox, Ralf J.
Black, Isra
Borasio, Gian Domenico
Anneser, Johanna
Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title_full Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title_fullStr Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title_full_unstemmed Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title_short Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
title_sort voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1
work_keys_str_mv AT joxralfj voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified
AT blackisra voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified
AT borasiogiandomenico voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified
AT anneserjohanna voluntarystoppingofeatinganddrinkingismedicalsupportethicallyjustified