Cargando…

Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways

Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy, Tharanya, Murugesan, Kholová, Jana, Wangari Muriuki, Ruth, Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan, Vadez, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663
_version_ 1783272506746994688
author Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy
Tharanya, Murugesan
Kholová, Jana
Wangari Muriuki, Ruth
Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan
Vadez, Vincent
author_facet Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy
Tharanya, Murugesan
Kholová, Jana
Wangari Muriuki, Ruth
Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan
Vadez, Vincent
author_sort Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy
collection PubMed
description Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydraulic conductance differences. Experiments were conducted in both soil (Vertisol) and hydroponic culture. The assessment of the TR response to increasing VPD showed that high vigor genotypes had TR restriction under high VPD, and this was confirmed in the early vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 4958 and RIL 211) having lower TR than the late vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 1882 and RIL 022). Inhibition of water transport pathways [apoplast and symplast (aquaporins)] in intact plants led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. De-rooted shoot treatment with an aquaporin inhibitor led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. Early vigor genotypes had lower root hydraulic conductivity than late vigor/high TR genotypes. Under inhibited conditions (apoplast, symplast), root hydraulic conductivity was reduced more in the late vigor/high TR genotypes than in the early vigor/low TR genotypes. We interpret that early vigor/low TR genotypes have a lower involvement of aquaporins in water transport pathways and may also have a smaller apoplastic pathway than high TR genotypes, which could explain the transpiration restriction under high VPD and would be helpful to conserve soil water under high evaporative demand. These findings open an opportunity for breeding to tailor genotypes with different “dosage” of these traits toward adaptation to varying drought-prone environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56491402017-10-30 Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy Tharanya, Murugesan Kholová, Jana Wangari Muriuki, Ruth Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan Vadez, Vincent Front Plant Sci Plant Science Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydraulic conductance differences. Experiments were conducted in both soil (Vertisol) and hydroponic culture. The assessment of the TR response to increasing VPD showed that high vigor genotypes had TR restriction under high VPD, and this was confirmed in the early vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 4958 and RIL 211) having lower TR than the late vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 1882 and RIL 022). Inhibition of water transport pathways [apoplast and symplast (aquaporins)] in intact plants led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. De-rooted shoot treatment with an aquaporin inhibitor led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. Early vigor genotypes had lower root hydraulic conductivity than late vigor/high TR genotypes. Under inhibited conditions (apoplast, symplast), root hydraulic conductivity was reduced more in the late vigor/high TR genotypes than in the early vigor/low TR genotypes. We interpret that early vigor/low TR genotypes have a lower involvement of aquaporins in water transport pathways and may also have a smaller apoplastic pathway than high TR genotypes, which could explain the transpiration restriction under high VPD and would be helpful to conserve soil water under high evaporative demand. These findings open an opportunity for breeding to tailor genotypes with different “dosage” of these traits toward adaptation to varying drought-prone environments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5649140/ /pubmed/29085377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sivasakthi, Tharanya, Kholová, Wangari Muriuki, Thirunalasundari and Vadez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy
Tharanya, Murugesan
Kholová, Jana
Wangari Muriuki, Ruth
Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan
Vadez, Vincent
Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title_full Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title_fullStr Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title_full_unstemmed Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title_short Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
title_sort chickpea genotypes contrasting for vigor and canopy conductance also differ in their dependence on different water transport pathways
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663
work_keys_str_mv AT sivasakthikaliamoorthy chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways
AT tharanyamurugesan chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways
AT kholovajana chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways
AT wangarimuriukiruth chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways
AT thirunalasundarithiyagarajan chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways
AT vadezvincent chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways