Cargando…
Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways
Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663 |
_version_ | 1783272506746994688 |
---|---|
author | Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy Tharanya, Murugesan Kholová, Jana Wangari Muriuki, Ruth Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan Vadez, Vincent |
author_facet | Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy Tharanya, Murugesan Kholová, Jana Wangari Muriuki, Ruth Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan Vadez, Vincent |
author_sort | Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydraulic conductance differences. Experiments were conducted in both soil (Vertisol) and hydroponic culture. The assessment of the TR response to increasing VPD showed that high vigor genotypes had TR restriction under high VPD, and this was confirmed in the early vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 4958 and RIL 211) having lower TR than the late vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 1882 and RIL 022). Inhibition of water transport pathways [apoplast and symplast (aquaporins)] in intact plants led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. De-rooted shoot treatment with an aquaporin inhibitor led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. Early vigor genotypes had lower root hydraulic conductivity than late vigor/high TR genotypes. Under inhibited conditions (apoplast, symplast), root hydraulic conductivity was reduced more in the late vigor/high TR genotypes than in the early vigor/low TR genotypes. We interpret that early vigor/low TR genotypes have a lower involvement of aquaporins in water transport pathways and may also have a smaller apoplastic pathway than high TR genotypes, which could explain the transpiration restriction under high VPD and would be helpful to conserve soil water under high evaporative demand. These findings open an opportunity for breeding to tailor genotypes with different “dosage” of these traits toward adaptation to varying drought-prone environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5649140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56491402017-10-30 Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy Tharanya, Murugesan Kholová, Jana Wangari Muriuki, Ruth Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan Vadez, Vincent Front Plant Sci Plant Science Lower plant transpiration rate (TR) under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) conditions and early plant vigor are proposed as major traits influencing the rate of crop water use and possibly the fitness of chickpea lines to specific terminal drought conditions—this being the major constraint limiting chickpea productivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying difference in TR under high VPD and vigor are still unresolved, and so is the link between vigor and TR. Lower TR is hypothesized to relate to hydraulic conductance differences. Experiments were conducted in both soil (Vertisol) and hydroponic culture. The assessment of the TR response to increasing VPD showed that high vigor genotypes had TR restriction under high VPD, and this was confirmed in the early vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 4958 and RIL 211) having lower TR than the late vigor parent and progeny genotype (ICC 1882 and RIL 022). Inhibition of water transport pathways [apoplast and symplast (aquaporins)] in intact plants led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. De-rooted shoot treatment with an aquaporin inhibitor led to a lower transpiration inhibition in the early vigor/low TR genotypes than in the late vigor/high TR genotypes. Early vigor genotypes had lower root hydraulic conductivity than late vigor/high TR genotypes. Under inhibited conditions (apoplast, symplast), root hydraulic conductivity was reduced more in the late vigor/high TR genotypes than in the early vigor/low TR genotypes. We interpret that early vigor/low TR genotypes have a lower involvement of aquaporins in water transport pathways and may also have a smaller apoplastic pathway than high TR genotypes, which could explain the transpiration restriction under high VPD and would be helpful to conserve soil water under high evaporative demand. These findings open an opportunity for breeding to tailor genotypes with different “dosage” of these traits toward adaptation to varying drought-prone environments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5649140/ /pubmed/29085377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sivasakthi, Tharanya, Kholová, Wangari Muriuki, Thirunalasundari and Vadez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Sivasakthi, Kaliamoorthy Tharanya, Murugesan Kholová, Jana Wangari Muriuki, Ruth Thirunalasundari, Thiyagarajan Vadez, Vincent Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title | Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title_full | Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title_fullStr | Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title_full_unstemmed | Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title_short | Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways |
title_sort | chickpea genotypes contrasting for vigor and canopy conductance also differ in their dependence on different water transport pathways |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivasakthikaliamoorthy chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways AT tharanyamurugesan chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways AT kholovajana chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways AT wangarimuriukiruth chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways AT thirunalasundarithiyagarajan chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways AT vadezvincent chickpeagenotypescontrastingforvigorandcanopyconductancealsodifferintheirdependenceondifferentwatertransportpathways |