Cargando…

Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Edward, James, Jennifer L., Hartsell, William, Scarantino, Charles W., Ivker, Robert, Roach, Mack, III, Suh, John H., Demas, William, Konski, Andre, Bruner, Deborah Watkins
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w
_version_ 1783272575631097856
author Chow, Edward
James, Jennifer L.
Hartsell, William
Scarantino, Charles W.
Ivker, Robert
Roach, Mack
III,
Suh, John H.
Demas, William
Konski, Andre
Bruner, Deborah Watkins
author_facet Chow, Edward
James, Jennifer L.
Hartsell, William
Scarantino, Charles W.
Ivker, Robert
Roach, Mack
III,
Suh, John H.
Demas, William
Konski, Andre
Bruner, Deborah Watkins
author_sort Chow, Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily available factors: primary cancer site, site of metastases and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). This predictive model was used in the current study, where each factor was assigned a value proportional to its prognostic weight and the sum of the weighted scores for each patient was survival prediction score (SPS). Patients were also classified according to their number of risk factors (NRF). Three risk groups were established. The Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) 9714 data was used to provide an additional external validation set comprised of patients treated among multiple institutions with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The RTOG external validation set comprised of 908 patients treated at 66 different radiation facilities from 1998 to 2002. The SPS method classified all patients into the low-risk group. Based on the NRF, two distinct risk groups with significantly different survival estimates were identified. The ability to predict survival was similar to that of the training and previous validation datasets for both the SPS and NRF methods. CONCLUSIONS: The three variable NRF model is preferred because of its relative simplicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56496562017-11-16 Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 Chow, Edward James, Jennifer L. Hartsell, William Scarantino, Charles W. Ivker, Robert Roach, Mack III, Suh, John H. Demas, William Konski, Andre Bruner, Deborah Watkins World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily available factors: primary cancer site, site of metastases and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). This predictive model was used in the current study, where each factor was assigned a value proportional to its prognostic weight and the sum of the weighted scores for each patient was survival prediction score (SPS). Patients were also classified according to their number of risk factors (NRF). Three risk groups were established. The Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) 9714 data was used to provide an additional external validation set comprised of patients treated among multiple institutions with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The RTOG external validation set comprised of 908 patients treated at 66 different radiation facilities from 1998 to 2002. The SPS method classified all patients into the low-risk group. Based on the NRF, two distinct risk groups with significantly different survival estimates were identified. The ability to predict survival was similar to that of the training and previous validation datasets for both the SPS and NRF methods. CONCLUSIONS: The three variable NRF model is preferred because of its relative simplicity. Elmer Press 2011-08 2011-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5649656/ /pubmed/29147245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w Text en Copyright 2011, Chow et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chow, Edward
James, Jennifer L.
Hartsell, William
Scarantino, Charles W.
Ivker, Robert
Roach, Mack
III,
Suh, John H.
Demas, William
Konski, Andre
Bruner, Deborah Watkins
Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title_full Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title_fullStr Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title_short Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
title_sort validation of a predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer: secondary analysis of rtog 9714
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w
work_keys_str_mv AT chowedward validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT jamesjenniferl validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT hartsellwilliam validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT scarantinocharlesw validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT ivkerrobert validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT roachmack validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT iii validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT suhjohnh validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT demaswilliam validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT konskiandre validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714
AT brunerdeborahwatkins validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714