Cargando…
Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w |
_version_ | 1783272575631097856 |
---|---|
author | Chow, Edward James, Jennifer L. Hartsell, William Scarantino, Charles W. Ivker, Robert Roach, Mack III, Suh, John H. Demas, William Konski, Andre Bruner, Deborah Watkins |
author_facet | Chow, Edward James, Jennifer L. Hartsell, William Scarantino, Charles W. Ivker, Robert Roach, Mack III, Suh, John H. Demas, William Konski, Andre Bruner, Deborah Watkins |
author_sort | Chow, Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily available factors: primary cancer site, site of metastases and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). This predictive model was used in the current study, where each factor was assigned a value proportional to its prognostic weight and the sum of the weighted scores for each patient was survival prediction score (SPS). Patients were also classified according to their number of risk factors (NRF). Three risk groups were established. The Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) 9714 data was used to provide an additional external validation set comprised of patients treated among multiple institutions with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The RTOG external validation set comprised of 908 patients treated at 66 different radiation facilities from 1998 to 2002. The SPS method classified all patients into the low-risk group. Based on the NRF, two distinct risk groups with significantly different survival estimates were identified. The ability to predict survival was similar to that of the training and previous validation datasets for both the SPS and NRF methods. CONCLUSIONS: The three variable NRF model is preferred because of its relative simplicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5649656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56496562017-11-16 Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 Chow, Edward James, Jennifer L. Hartsell, William Scarantino, Charles W. Ivker, Robert Roach, Mack III, Suh, John H. Demas, William Konski, Andre Bruner, Deborah Watkins World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate a simple predictive model for survival of patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Previous studies with training and validation datasets developed a model predicting survival of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy using three readily available factors: primary cancer site, site of metastases and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). This predictive model was used in the current study, where each factor was assigned a value proportional to its prognostic weight and the sum of the weighted scores for each patient was survival prediction score (SPS). Patients were also classified according to their number of risk factors (NRF). Three risk groups were established. The Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) 9714 data was used to provide an additional external validation set comprised of patients treated among multiple institutions with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The RTOG external validation set comprised of 908 patients treated at 66 different radiation facilities from 1998 to 2002. The SPS method classified all patients into the low-risk group. Based on the NRF, two distinct risk groups with significantly different survival estimates were identified. The ability to predict survival was similar to that of the training and previous validation datasets for both the SPS and NRF methods. CONCLUSIONS: The three variable NRF model is preferred because of its relative simplicity. Elmer Press 2011-08 2011-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5649656/ /pubmed/29147245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w Text en Copyright 2011, Chow et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chow, Edward James, Jennifer L. Hartsell, William Scarantino, Charles W. Ivker, Robert Roach, Mack III, Suh, John H. Demas, William Konski, Andre Bruner, Deborah Watkins Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title | Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title_full | Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title_short | Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714 |
title_sort | validation of a predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer: secondary analysis of rtog 9714 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon325w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowedward validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT jamesjenniferl validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT hartsellwilliam validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT scarantinocharlesw validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT ivkerrobert validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT roachmack validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT iii validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT suhjohnh validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT demaswilliam validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT konskiandre validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 AT brunerdeborahwatkins validationofapredictivemodelforsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedcancersecondaryanalysisofrtog9714 |