Cargando…

Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that KRAS mutations are negative predictors of benefit from both adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR directed therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Needle core biopsy, cytology specimen and resected tissue have all been used for KRAS mutational an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swati, Ismatun, Zhang, Shengle, Tull, Jamie, Khurana, Kamal K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147262
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon416w
_version_ 1783272587610030080
author Swati, Ismatun
Zhang, Shengle
Tull, Jamie
Khurana, Kamal K
author_facet Swati, Ismatun
Zhang, Shengle
Tull, Jamie
Khurana, Kamal K
author_sort Swati, Ismatun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that KRAS mutations are negative predictors of benefit from both adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR directed therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Needle core biopsy, cytology specimen and resected tissue have all been used for KRAS mutational analysis of malignant lung tumors. However, studies validating the correlation between needle core biopsy/cytology specimen and resected tissue, histologic reference standard for KRAS mutational analysis are lacking. We retrospectively compared the KRAS mutation detection on cytology specimen or needle core biopsy with corresponding resected malignant neoplasm of lung, the histologic reference standard for mutational analysis. METHOD: Twenty-seven samples including 8 cell blocks, 9 cytology smears and 10 needle core biopsies, and corresponding 22 resected malignant tumor of lung were correlated for KRAS mutational analysis. In cases where cell block material did not correspond with results on resected specimen, cytology smears of corresponding cases were microdissected for isolation of DNA. RESULTS: The needle core biopsy specimens and the corresponding surgical resections showed 100% concordant results for KRAS mutational analysis. KRAS mutation was detected in 4 out of 8 cell blocks, compared to 7 out of 8 corresponding surgical resections. Low cellularity (2 cases) and failure to retrieve DNA (1case) resulted in lack of correlation in 3 cases with cell blocks. However, cytology smears in these 3 cases confirmed the KRAS mutation noted in corresponding surgical resections. Overall concordance between cytology smears and corresponding surgical resections was 89% (8 of 9 cases). KRAS mutation was detected in 1 of the 9 cytology smears and was lacking in corresponding surgically resection. CONCLUSION: Cytology specimen and needle core biopsies provide adequate material for KRAS mutational analysis. Excellent mutational analysis concordance between cytology specimen/needle core biopsies and resected tumor suggests that predictive marker based therapeutic decision need not shift to more invasive surgical procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56497112017-11-16 Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen Swati, Ismatun Zhang, Shengle Tull, Jamie Khurana, Kamal K World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that KRAS mutations are negative predictors of benefit from both adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR directed therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Needle core biopsy, cytology specimen and resected tissue have all been used for KRAS mutational analysis of malignant lung tumors. However, studies validating the correlation between needle core biopsy/cytology specimen and resected tissue, histologic reference standard for KRAS mutational analysis are lacking. We retrospectively compared the KRAS mutation detection on cytology specimen or needle core biopsy with corresponding resected malignant neoplasm of lung, the histologic reference standard for mutational analysis. METHOD: Twenty-seven samples including 8 cell blocks, 9 cytology smears and 10 needle core biopsies, and corresponding 22 resected malignant tumor of lung were correlated for KRAS mutational analysis. In cases where cell block material did not correspond with results on resected specimen, cytology smears of corresponding cases were microdissected for isolation of DNA. RESULTS: The needle core biopsy specimens and the corresponding surgical resections showed 100% concordant results for KRAS mutational analysis. KRAS mutation was detected in 4 out of 8 cell blocks, compared to 7 out of 8 corresponding surgical resections. Low cellularity (2 cases) and failure to retrieve DNA (1case) resulted in lack of correlation in 3 cases with cell blocks. However, cytology smears in these 3 cases confirmed the KRAS mutation noted in corresponding surgical resections. Overall concordance between cytology smears and corresponding surgical resections was 89% (8 of 9 cases). KRAS mutation was detected in 1 of the 9 cytology smears and was lacking in corresponding surgically resection. CONCLUSION: Cytology specimen and needle core biopsies provide adequate material for KRAS mutational analysis. Excellent mutational analysis concordance between cytology specimen/needle core biopsies and resected tumor suggests that predictive marker based therapeutic decision need not shift to more invasive surgical procedures. Elmer Press 2011-12 2011-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5649711/ /pubmed/29147262 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon416w Text en Copyright 2011, Swati et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Swati, Ismatun
Zhang, Shengle
Tull, Jamie
Khurana, Kamal K
Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title_full Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title_fullStr Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title_short Accuracy of Cytology Specimen and Needle Core Biopsies for Detection of KRAS Mutation in Non-Small Cell Carcinoma: Comparison With Resection Specimen
title_sort accuracy of cytology specimen and needle core biopsies for detection of kras mutation in non-small cell carcinoma: comparison with resection specimen
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147262
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon416w
work_keys_str_mv AT swatiismatun accuracyofcytologyspecimenandneedlecorebiopsiesfordetectionofkrasmutationinnonsmallcellcarcinomacomparisonwithresectionspecimen
AT zhangshengle accuracyofcytologyspecimenandneedlecorebiopsiesfordetectionofkrasmutationinnonsmallcellcarcinomacomparisonwithresectionspecimen
AT tulljamie accuracyofcytologyspecimenandneedlecorebiopsiesfordetectionofkrasmutationinnonsmallcellcarcinomacomparisonwithresectionspecimen
AT khuranakamalk accuracyofcytologyspecimenandneedlecorebiopsiesfordetectionofkrasmutationinnonsmallcellcarcinomacomparisonwithresectionspecimen