Cargando…

Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: To present the early findings of a phase I clinical trial studying the use of intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) to treat at risk pelvic and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with high risk prostate cancer while escalating dose. Dose escalation was performed with a te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Christine, Ning, Holly, Lita, Elena, McNally, Deborah, Wood, Bradford J, Choyke, Peter, Guion, Peter, Smith, Sharon, Krieger, Axel, Camphausen, Kevin, Singh, Anurag K, Kaushal, Aradhana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147273
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon436w
_version_ 1783272613314822144
author Ko, Christine
Ning, Holly
Lita, Elena
McNally, Deborah
Wood, Bradford J
Choyke, Peter
Guion, Peter
Smith, Sharon
Krieger, Axel
Camphausen, Kevin
Singh, Anurag K
Kaushal, Aradhana
author_facet Ko, Christine
Ning, Holly
Lita, Elena
McNally, Deborah
Wood, Bradford J
Choyke, Peter
Guion, Peter
Smith, Sharon
Krieger, Axel
Camphausen, Kevin
Singh, Anurag K
Kaushal, Aradhana
author_sort Ko, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To present the early findings of a phase I clinical trial studying the use of intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) to treat at risk pelvic and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with high risk prostate cancer while escalating dose. Dose escalation was performed with a technique particularly aiming to limit the dose to surrounding critical structures. METHODS: A total of 12 patients were treated with an IMRT plan that delivered 45 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes, prostate and proximal seminal vesicles. This was followed by an image guided IMRT plan that delivered 9 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles and then an additional 21.6 Gy delivered to the prostate for a total dose of 75.6 Gy to the prostate. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were recorded weekly throughout treatment and in follow up (range: 20 - 49 months). RESULTS: At diagnosis, median age was 64, median PSA 15.5 (range: 5 - 103) and Gleason score ranged 7 - 9. The median dose to the bladder was 52 Gy, the median dose to the rectum was 53 Gy and the median dose to the small bowel was 26 Gy. During treatment, Grade 2 GU toxicity was noted in 3/12 (25%) patients and Grade 2 GI toxicity was noted in 2/12 patients (16%). At a median follow-up of 28 months, Grade 2 late GI toxicity was seen in 1/12 (8%) and late GU in 3/12 (25%) of patients. There were no acute or late grade 3 and 4 GU or GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the feasibility of using IMRT for pelvic and lower para-aortic nodal irradiation as the toxicities are low for the total dose that was delivered. This shows promise for reducing normal tissue doses, improving target control, and potentially allowing for additional dose escalation to the pelvic/lower para-aortic lymph nodes in our successive cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56498312017-11-16 Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer Ko, Christine Ning, Holly Lita, Elena McNally, Deborah Wood, Bradford J Choyke, Peter Guion, Peter Smith, Sharon Krieger, Axel Camphausen, Kevin Singh, Anurag K Kaushal, Aradhana World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: To present the early findings of a phase I clinical trial studying the use of intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) to treat at risk pelvic and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with high risk prostate cancer while escalating dose. Dose escalation was performed with a technique particularly aiming to limit the dose to surrounding critical structures. METHODS: A total of 12 patients were treated with an IMRT plan that delivered 45 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes, prostate and proximal seminal vesicles. This was followed by an image guided IMRT plan that delivered 9 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles and then an additional 21.6 Gy delivered to the prostate for a total dose of 75.6 Gy to the prostate. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were recorded weekly throughout treatment and in follow up (range: 20 - 49 months). RESULTS: At diagnosis, median age was 64, median PSA 15.5 (range: 5 - 103) and Gleason score ranged 7 - 9. The median dose to the bladder was 52 Gy, the median dose to the rectum was 53 Gy and the median dose to the small bowel was 26 Gy. During treatment, Grade 2 GU toxicity was noted in 3/12 (25%) patients and Grade 2 GI toxicity was noted in 2/12 patients (16%). At a median follow-up of 28 months, Grade 2 late GI toxicity was seen in 1/12 (8%) and late GU in 3/12 (25%) of patients. There were no acute or late grade 3 and 4 GU or GI toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the feasibility of using IMRT for pelvic and lower para-aortic nodal irradiation as the toxicities are low for the total dose that was delivered. This shows promise for reducing normal tissue doses, improving target control, and potentially allowing for additional dose escalation to the pelvic/lower para-aortic lymph nodes in our successive cohorts. Elmer Press 2012-02 2012-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5649831/ /pubmed/29147273 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon436w Text en Copyright 2012, Ko et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ko, Christine
Ning, Holly
Lita, Elena
McNally, Deborah
Wood, Bradford J
Choyke, Peter
Guion, Peter
Smith, Sharon
Krieger, Axel
Camphausen, Kevin
Singh, Anurag K
Kaushal, Aradhana
Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_short Early Experiences of Image Guided Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_sort early experiences of image guided prostate and pelvic nodal irradiation with intensity modulated radiation treatment in localized prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147273
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon436w
work_keys_str_mv AT kochristine earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT ningholly earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT litaelena earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mcnallydeborah earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT woodbradfordj earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT choykepeter earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT guionpeter earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT smithsharon earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT kriegeraxel earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT camphausenkevin earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT singhanuragk earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT kaushalaradhana earlyexperiencesofimageguidedprostateandpelvicnodalirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtreatmentinlocalizedprostatecancer